Hi I'm interested in Clojure DataFrame implementation. How is this going
now? Are you coding for core.matrix or are you writing a new library from
scratch? How can I join in this project?
在 2016年3月10日星期四 UTC+8上午4:57:31，arthur.ma...@gmail.com写道：
>
> Is there any desire or need for a Clojure DataF
Is there a reason why some clojure.test.check generators are excluded from
clojure.spec.gen lazy primitives?
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/1f25347a7b219488d5d9f8d17b04f2cc7828b30e/src/clj/clojure/spec/gen.clj#L114
The nat generator as one example is missing.
Best regards,
Joe N
--
This was fixed in http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1233 way back in
Clojure 1.6.
On Saturday, June 4, 2016 at 5:25:34 PM UTC-5, Fluid Dynamics wrote:
>
> "Warning: ** not declared dynamic and thus is not dynamically rebindable,
> but its name suggests otherwise. Please either indicate ^:dy
"Warning: ** not declared dynamic and thus is not dynamically rebindable,
but its name suggests otherwise. Please either indicate ^:dynamic ** or
change the name."
*foo* is earmuffed, but ** has nothing between the astersisks to be
earmuffed. Far more likely is that someone has defined a specia
I support this change. Not only is it closer to the GIGO philosophy, but
"let x in S" is actually a very reasonable use-case. Sometimes I just want
an element from a set and I don't care about which particular one.
Your code may break if you're using try/catch to handle sets in a special
way, b
Hi Alex,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Alex Miller wrote:
> Why?
>
Because unordered collections shouldn't have heads defined.
Is (first #{3 1 2}) => 3? or 2? or 1?
(I just tried it in a REPL and it is apparently 1.)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
How is this a regression?
It doesn't cause any code that used to work to stop working.
The fact that tail destructuring now causes non-sequential collections to be
destructured by sequential destructuring should be just considered an instance
of GIGO and an implementation detail.
> On 4 Jun 20
What are you asking “Why?” about? You haven’t quoted anything so it’s not clear
what you’re asking about.
Alan
On 4 Jun 2016, at 13:22, Alex Miller wrote:
> Why?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, sen
Why?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
