[ANN] "Clojure for Finance" Published

2016-01-20 Thread Timothy Washington
Hello, I’ve been somewhat of a hermit over the last year or so. A large part of that was the time it took to author my first book. I’m very happy to announce the release of *Clojure for Finance *. I've had some good feedback from non-programmers. So I think a review from pro

Re: ANN replikativ 0.1.0 - strong eventual consistent P2P replication for clj and cljs

2016-01-20 Thread Zubair Quraishi
This is great work! Can it be compared to something like Datomic and Datascript? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be p

Re: Clojure beyond Java 6 ?

2016-01-20 Thread Colin Fleming
> > Such project obviously don't care about bug fixes and new features, since > they are stuck with dangerously old legacy JVM versions anyways, which is > both a security risk, a risk of added defects, and prevents usage of newer > Java features. > Sigh. I feel like a broken record here, but I'd

Re: Emulating the Syntax quote

2016-01-20 Thread Krisztián Szabó
FYI: You can drop the parentheses inside the -> macro. On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 3:18:34 PM UTC-8, JvJ wrote: > > Here's the solution I came up with: > > (s/defn qualify :- s/Symbol > "Convert a symbol to a qualified symbol. If the > symbol does not already refer to an existing var, > d

Re: Emulating the Syntax quote

2016-01-20 Thread JvJ
Here's the solution I came up with: (s/defn qualify :- s/Symbol "Convert a symbol to a qualified symbol. If the symbol does not already refer to an existing var, default to the current namespace." [sym :- s/Symbol] (let [res (resolve sym) ns (or (and res (-> res (meta) (:ns) (.name)

Re: Clojure beyond Java 6 ?

2016-01-20 Thread Didier
The only reason to maintain compatibility with old JVM is to allow getting new features and bug fixes in an environment that for businesses or technical constraint can not upgrade to the latest JVM. Such project obviously don't care about bug fixes and new features, since they are stuck with da

Re: Heard about clojure today. is it one of the big tecnologies for the future? or is it becoming deprecated?

2016-01-20 Thread Alex Miller
Each of the Clojure confs is in the 400-600 range and there are over 10k people on this list and about 4500 on Clojurians slack last time I looked. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegro

Re: Heard about clojure today. is it one of the big tecnologies for the future? or is it becoming deprecated?

2016-01-20 Thread Andy Fingerhut
That repository you did the Pulse graph on contains basically what you would think of in the core implementation of Python/Ruby/etc. with only the most minimal of libraries included. No extra modules/gems/etc. The libraries of Clojure are all spread across many other repositories, and Clojure was

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: ANN replikativ 0.1.0 - strong eventual consistent P2P replication for clj and cljs

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel Kersten
I've actually been looking at Replikativ (and CRDT's in general) over the past ~3 weeks, so I'm very happy to hear that Replikativ is moving forwards. It looks incredibly interesting. On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 16:30 Thomas wrote: > Looks very interesting and I suspect there were some pretty hard pr

Re: Heard about clojure today. is it one of the big tecnologies for the future? or is it becoming deprecated?

2016-01-20 Thread kovas boguta
Most of Clojure development activity happens in JIRA http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ If you want a sense of overall community activity, check https://github.com/search?l=Clojure&o=desc&q=clojure&s=updated&type=Repositories&utf8=%E2%9C%93 On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Andy Fingerhut wr

Re: ANN replikativ 0.1.0 - strong eventual consistent P2P replication for clj and cljs

2016-01-20 Thread Thomas
Looks very interesting and I suspect there were some pretty hard problems to solve!!! Thank you for open sourcing this. Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that p

Re: Emulating the Syntax quote

2016-01-20 Thread kovas boguta
Are you looking for https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/resolve ? On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:11 AM, JvJ wrote: > With the syntax quote, all symbols become namespace-qualified. (I.e `a => > user/a, `def=> clojure.core/def) > > Is there a way to determine how a given symbol would be qualified in

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0 is now available

2016-01-20 Thread kovas boguta
Another solid release. Thank you!! On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Thomas wrote: > An extra big thank you for all involved!!! > > Thomas > > > On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 13:22:28 UTC, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> The docs just haven't been regenerated yet - that's coming. >> >> -- > You receiv

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0 is now available

2016-01-20 Thread Thomas
An extra big thank you for all involved!!! Thomas On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 13:22:28 UTC, Alex Miller wrote: > > The docs just haven't been regenerated yet - that's coming. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this grou

Re: Heard about clojure today. is it one of the big tecnologies for the future? or is it becoming deprecated?

2016-01-20 Thread Max Countryman
Clojure is not becoming deprecated. A major release happened just yesterday in fact. > On Jan 20, 2016, at 08:04, Miguel Domingos > wrote: > > Hi, > > Just checked GIT Hub Pulse and it is very low. I just heard about this > technology today, so I don't know. > https://github.com/clojure/clo

Heard about clojure today. is it one of the big tecnologies for the future? or is it becoming deprecated?

2016-01-20 Thread Miguel Domingos
Hi, Just checked GIT Hub Pulse and it is very low. I just heard about this technology today, so I don't know. https://github.com/clojure/clojure/pulse Thanks, Miguel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0 is now available

2016-01-20 Thread Alex Miller
The docs just haven't been regenerated yet - that's coming. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your fir

Re: Clojure beyond Java 6 ?

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel Compton
Just a reminder that Cursive needs to support Java 6, as there are still issues with OpenJDK8 on Mac OS X 10.11. So not all people using Java 6 can be written off as enterprise laggards. On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 8:52 PM, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: > Even Java 1.7 already reached its end of life. I get

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0 is now available

2016-01-20 Thread Rick Moynihan
Sorry, had meant to paste the URL for you: http://clojure.org/api/api I suspect other links might also point to the older docs too. R. On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 10:01 Rick Moynihan wrote: > Congratulations to everyone involved on the new release! > > One very small issue I've just noticed with

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0 is now available

2016-01-20 Thread Rick Moynihan
Congratulations to everyone involved on the new release! One very small issue I've just noticed with the website though is that the links to the API documentation still point to 1.7.0. Thanks again to everyone for their hardwork! R. On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 03:31 Alex Miller wrote: > Dang it!

Emulating the Syntax quote

2016-01-20 Thread JvJ
With the syntax quote, all symbols become namespace-qualified. (I.e `a => user/a, `def=> clojure.core/def) Is there a way to determine how a given symbol would be qualified in the current environment, and to find out what it's implicit namespace would be? -- You received this message because