Re: [ANN] lein-plz 0.1.1 - Add dependencies quickly

You're welcome Uday! Sean, you're right. I'll add it and the remove task to the next feature release. Ivan, have you tried out a recent version? I haven't heard from other Windows users ;/. Would you comment on issue #3 ? Dylan, I've added gro

Re: [ANN] lein-plz 0.1.1 - Add dependencies quickly

On Aug 18, 2014, at 10:01 PM, john walker wrote: > Thanks Sean! > > I've thought about this issue for a while. arrdem suggested a clojars search > fallback. Maybe someone has pageranked clojure libraries? crossclj? Well, what caused me to suggest it was that lein-try already does something sim

Re: GSoC: Congratulations Aleksandr and Prasant!

Awesome! Very much appreciated! Michael On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:15:51 AM UTC-6, Mikera wrote: > > Hi All, > > Prasant and Aleksandr have been working all summer making Clojure even > better for data science / numerical computing. On behalf of myself and my > co-mentor Alex Ott I want to o

Re: Is there any Clojure magic for "registering" new implementations of something?

PD: Let's continue this thread on the github ticket. Saludos, Nahuel Greco. On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Nahuel Greco wrote: > Instead of defining Step superschema can you simply do: > > (s/validate something (get-schema step)) > > ?? > > If you need more than that, for example, if you nee

Re: GSoC: Congratulations Aleksandr and Prasant!

Thanks so much for your work! I'd be very interested to read more in detail about some of the work you did this summer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from

Re: Is there any Clojure magic for "registering" new implementations of something?

Instead of defining Step superschema can you simply do: (s/validate something (get-schema step)) ?? If you need more than that, for example, if you need a named schema to use it in function signatures, then I think you have two options: 1- Define a superschema just like in your example, but usi

Re: Resolve function or object by name in ClojureScript

To be fair, calling from outside of Clojurescript is probably the only use-case for this behavior that I can imagine, which is exactly what ^:export was designed (and named) for. -- Ashton Kemerling On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Thomas Heller wrote: > It is possible, the question is WHEN?

Re: GSoC: Congratulations Aleksandr and Prasant!

Very Nice! I'd be particularly interested to see some benchmarks to show off the improvements. -- Ashton Kemerling On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Mars0i wrote: > Thank you! to Prasant and Aleksandr. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojur

Re: GSoC: Congratulations Aleksandr and Prasant!

Thank you! to Prasant and Aleksandr. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe

Re: Resolve function or object by name in ClojureScript

It is possible, the question is WHEN? You can make a function callable by name if you export it. (ns myns) (def ^:export testfn [] :foo) can be called like so, must be careful with name munging though: (let [the-fn (aget js/window "myns" "testfn")] (the-fn)) which also works with advanced

Re: Presentation about Clojure

i like this one : http://bridgethillyer.github.io/simplicity-ws/#/ On Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:36:29 PM UTC+5:30, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > > I am far from an expert on Clojure, but I am thinking about giving a talk > about it on an Open Source event. > > Any tips about what to treat and

Re: Resolve function or object by name in ClojureScript

Any such facility is at odds with Google Closure Compiler's advanced compilation. David On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Timur wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Is there a way to resolve a function or object using its string name in > ClojureScript? I found this however it is old: > > http://stackover

New Functional Programming Job Opportunities

Here are some functional programming job opportunities that were posted recently: Frontend (Clojurescript) developer to take on the PR industry with us! at Spokepoint http://functionaljobs.com/jobs/8735-frontend-clojurescript-developer-to-take-on-the-pr-industry-with-us-at-spokepoint Cheer

Resolve function or object by name in ClojureScript

Hi everybody, Is there a way to resolve a function or object using its string name in ClojureScript? I found this however it is old: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12020576/resolve-function-throws-an-error-in-clojurescript-but-not-clojure/12020663#12020663 Thanks in advance. -- You rec

Re: GSoC: Congratulations Aleksandr and Prasant!

There is no specific date yet, but I plan to cut intermediate release(s) as Incanter 1.9.x so you can try new functionality & report bugs if you find some. After this stabilization phase (together with accepting pending pull requests & fixing the issues) the version 2.0 will be released - I hope th

Re: GSoC: Congratulations Aleksandr and Prasant!

I join to congratulations - this is fantastic work! On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Mikera wrote: > Hi All, > > Prasant and Aleksandr have been working all summer making Clojure even > better for data science / numerical computing. On behalf of myself and my > co-mentor Alex Ott I want to offe

Re: Is there any Clojure magic for "registering" new implementations of something?

Hi Nahuel, On Saturday, August 23, 2014 7:23:42 PM UTC+2, nahuel wrote: > > what about: > > (defmulti step-handler :type) > (defmulti get-schema :type) ;; returns the schema > > And make your users implement both? Remember schemas are first-class > values. > The difficulty I'm having is figu

Re: GSoC: Congratulations Aleksandr and Prasant!

So, can you tell us, when Incanter 2.0 will be released?) On 25 August 2014 11:08, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant < abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fantastic! > > Thanks, > Ambrose > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Mikera > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Prasant and Aleksandr have been working

Re: [ANN] shadow-pgsql: PostgreSQL without JDBC

http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-pool/ 2.2 The clojure end should manage connection handling for you, if you need to keep a connection open (or transactions) there are (shadow.pgsql/with-connection db ...) and (shadow.pgsql/with-transaction db ...) macros, you should never actuall

Re: Sente - is it possible to close a connection?

Hi Peter, Thanks for chiming in. Actually I missread the code since chsk/close is handled on the client, but if course it is sent from the server, which is what I want. Thanks for clarifying. I don't mind it reconnecting (in fact, it's desirable for what I want). Basically what I want to achieve

Re: GSoC: Congratulations Aleksandr and Prasant!

Fantastic! Thanks, Ambrose On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Mikera wrote: > Hi All, > > Prasant and Aleksandr have been working all summer making Clojure even > better for data science / numerical computing. On behalf of myself and my > co-mentor Alex Ott I want to offer congratulations to the