I am trying clojurescript right now and when I compiling the node example
on the quick page, an error happens.
* temp : cat nodehello.cljs
(ns nodehello)
(defn -main [& args]
(println (apply str (map [\ "world" "hello"] [2 0 1]
(set! *main-cli-fn* -main)
* temp : cljsc nodehello.cljs '
2012/10/20 Sean Corfield
> Just bringing this up as a general issue for discussion around breaking
> API changes in low-level libraries that many things may depend on.
I'd like to point out that there was 0 upfront communication about the
changes and it was not made clear in the
announcement th
When I eval in the cljs-repl:
(set! *print-fn* clojure.browser.repl/repl-print)
all works again.
Seems that the "(defmethod handle-post :ready [_ conn _] …)" in
cljs.repl.browser doesn't assign the *print-fn* in the cljs-repl (?).
Not sure if anything changed there (?).
-FS.
On Oct 19,
Not sure if its my cljs-config somehow (working off head r1514), but println
doesn't seem to be working anymore:
ClojureScript:cljs.user> (println "JAJA")
"Error evaluating:" (println "JAJA") :as
"cljs.core.println.call(null,\"JAJA\");\n"
#
_STAR_print_fn_STAR_@http://10.0.1.18:9000/js/main-debu
I've filed a CLJS issue for this, and attached a patch:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-400
Thanks for keeping on this, Dave. :-)
- Chas
On Oct 19, 6:18 pm, Dave Sann wrote:
> Chas, If your patch works without issue - this is probably better because
> it will then work with existing ve
Removing the old API causes problems for projects that have transitive
dependencies on multiple versions of c.d.json.
For example, congomongo depends on c.d.json 0.1.3, specifically on
json-str. At World Singles we depend on c.d.json directly and we depend on
congomongo. We can't move to c.d.json
Chas, If your patch works without issue - this is probably better because
it will then work with existing versions of Clojure - clojurescript is
changing faster and people a probably upgrading faster.
I don't think it does any harm for Clojure to be able to read these chars
but fixing the inte
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Kevin Downey wrote:
> conj can surely produce maps, and does so happily in the following cases:
>
Doh! Of course. Thank you for the correction. I assumed that was his
problem without actually trying it - my bad :(
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Archite
The typehint of output should be ^java.io.OutputStream, sorry.
Also to your use case:
If you don't actually want to stream simultanously, you need to write the
data into a buffer and later stream from that.
Sorry again for the whopping triple post.
--
You received this message because you are
Sorry, I mistakenly pressed the send shortcut in gmail. The
modified-version of io/copy is:
(defn copy-multi
([input outputs] (copy-multi input outputs (make-array Byte/TYPE 1024)))
([^java.io.InputStream input outputs buffer]
(let [size (.read input buffer)]
(when (pos? size)
Hi,
I'm building an app (MIT license) which let's you share files easily
without depending on a third party service like CloudApp or Droplr. I'm
having the following problem; while uploading the file to your server I
want to stream the file directly to S3 and disk. Why both? Because when
the reque
ClojureScript release 0.0-1513 is on its way to the Maven Central
Repository.
Changes: http://build.clojure.org/job/clojurescript-release/18/
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegrou
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Tamreen Khan wrote:
> While Clojurescript aims to be close to Clojure, they're still
> different languages, with entirely different compilers. Much of the
> Clojure toolchain uses the extension to figure out how to compile a
> given file. Otherwise, as far as I kn
While Clojurescript aims to be close to Clojure, they're still
different languages, with entirely different compilers. Much of the
Clojure toolchain uses the extension to figure out how to compile a
given file. Otherwise, as far as I know there's no reasonable way to
tell apart Clojure code from Cl
https://github.com/clojure/data.json
Highlights:
- New API
- Customizable type conversion functions
- big int and big decimal support
- Performance improvements
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to cloj
Does the println show you what you expect?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:35 PM, larry google groups <
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I suggesting adding printlns or logging or a debugger
> > and checking the
> > value of this-users-params, it is almost certainly not
> > what you expect
> > i
maybe make the string "username" be a symbol ie. 'username
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:39 PM, larry google groups <
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >you have `username` a symbol as the key in your map, but you are
> >looking for `:username` they keyword as a key
>
> Ah, interesting, perhaps I t
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:39 PM, larry google groups <
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >you have `username` a symbol as the key in your map, but you are
> >looking for `:username` they keyword as a key
>
> Ah, interesting, perhaps I tested this somewhere else. To be sure, I tried
> this again:
Hi All,
I've just started to learn Clojure and interested to see more
ClojureScript. It is really nice stuff- data structure, function and code
sharing. But Is there any reason to make different file extension (*.clj
and *.cljs) for Clojure and ClojureScript?
Regards,
Mamun
--
You received t
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:47 PM, larry google groups <
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Also:
>
>
>
> > I suggesting adding printlns or logging or a debugger and checking the
> > value of this-users-params, it is almost certainly not what you expect
> > it to be.
>
> I showed the output pre
(get {:username "a"} "username")
nil
(get {:username "a"} :username)
"a"
*(get {'username "a"} :username)*
nil
(get {'username "a"} 'username)
"a"
(get {:username "a"} 'username)
nil
*(get {'username "a"} "username")*
nil
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM, larry google groups <
lawrencecloj...@gmail
Okay, thanks for that last tip. I removed the use of :username everywhere
and instead replaced it with:
(get new-user-entry "username")
everywhere in the code. Now everything works fine. I realize now that was
the big difference between the REPL and the live server -- I used :username
at the R
On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:25 AM, David Nolen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Henrik Mohr wrote:
> Still I hope someone can answer the question on why ClojureScript behaves
> differently from Clojure.
>
> Output from Clojure:
> user=> (str "ø")
> "ø"
>
> Output from ClojureScript:
> #_
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Coen De Roover wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> What are your plans about the tables?
> I would side with the title of the issue rather than its description :)
>
I don't have any current plans to further improve the performance of
tabling. The only thing I am looking to f
>you have `username` a symbol as the key in your map, but you are
>looking for `:username` they keyword as a key
Ah, interesting, perhaps I tested this somewhere else. To be sure, I tried
this again:
(defn add-to-logged-in-registry [this-users-params]
(let [right-now (. (Date.) getTime)
>> (zf/xml-> zipper :ListRecords :record :metadata :oai_dc:dc :dc:language
>> zf/text)
This would require a namespace aware thing, but a possible syntax for
this (called Clark notation) is to use the URI of the namespace
instead of the prefix:
(zf/xml-> zipper :ListRecords :record :metadata :dc
:
>you have `username` a symbol as the key in your map, but you are
>looking for `:username` they keyword as a key
At some point I tried:
(get new-user-entry "username")
but that had the same result.
Username is clearly a key, yes?
What would you suggest?
On Friday, October 19, 2012 12:0
you have `username` a symbol as the key in your map, but you are
looking for `:username` they keyword as a key
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:47 AM, larry google groups
wrote:
>
>
> Also:
>
>
>
>> I suggesting adding printlns or logging or a debugger and checking the
>> value of this-users-params, it
On 17 Oct 2012, at 19:31, David Nolen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Reinout Stevens wrote:
> Another question: is it possible to manually reset the contents of the tables?
>
>
> Thanks a lot
>
>
> Reinout
>
> After some more thinking, I agree that the current behavior is not on
Also:
> I suggesting adding printlns or logging or a debugger and checking the
> value of this-users-params, it is almost certainly not what you expect
> it to be.
I showed the output previously, but I will do it again.
If I add a println like this:
(defn add-to-logged-in-registry [this-
On Friday, October 19, 2012 3:10:19 AM UTC-4, larry google groups wrote:
>
> Assume data that looks like this:
>
> {ziri {:last_name ziri, :image ziggy_stardust.jpg, :username larry,
> :first_name larry, updated 1350626694791}, erich {:last_name 7ich,
> :image 7ot_mein.jpg, :usernam
> I suggesting adding printlns or logging or a debugger
> and checking the
> value of this-users-params, it is almost certainly not
> what you expect
> it to be.
I already showed the output of the println statements I'd done, but I'll go
through this again.
I eventually try to output my i
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Henrik Mohr wrote:
> Still I hope someone can answer the question on why ClojureScript behaves
> differently from Clojure.
>
> Output from Clojure:
> user=> (str "ø")
> *"ø"*
>
> Output from ClojureScript:
> #_=> (str "ø")
> *"\xF8"*
>
> Output from node.js:
> >
> - Herwig Holchleitner: how would that solution with protocols be? I write
> a protocol that defines methods like `get` and `duplicate` and extend it
> for each buffer, delegating the methods to their specific implementations?
> ie, (defprotocol UnifiedBuffers (get [buff] "get data from buf") (du
On 2012-10-18, at 2:11 PM, Evan Gamble wrote:
> For the situation where the lets are nested because you're checking the
> values in some way after each binding, I wrote a macro called let?. I find it
> very useful and use it in nearly all my code.
> https://github.com/egamble/let-else
Hmmm,
Hi again,
On Friday, October 12, 2012 10:40:28 PM UTC+11, Arlen Christian Mart Cuss
wrote:
>
> https://github.com/unnali/rouge#readme
>
As an aside, I've set up a Google Group mailing list for discussion and
announcements:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rouge-talk
Cheers,
Arlen
--
Hi Armando,
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:48:44 AM UTC+11, Armando Blancas wrote:
>
> Finally came around to install a recent Ruby build and ran a little test
> script just to get a feel for the startup time. Looks good, though the
> faster the merrier.
That's a neat little check! It's enc
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, larry google groups <
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Assume data that looks like this:
>
> {ziri {:last_name ziri, :image ziggy_stardust.jpg, :username larry,
> :first_name larry, updated 1350626694791}, erich {:last_name 7ich,
> :image 7ot_mein.jp
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:20:09 PM UTC+11, Brian Marick wrote:
> hash.become(TimesliceShaped)
>
For the longest time I thought you were talking about the core Hash#become
(Hash#replace since 2002!). I've since become acquainted with Stunted. :)
That said, I'm a sucker for "non-OO"
Still I hope someone can answer the question on why ClojureScript behaves
differently from Clojure.
Output from Clojure:
user=> (str "ø")
*"ø"*
Output from ClojureScript:
#_=> (str "ø")
*"\xF8"*
Output from node.js:
> console.log ("ø");
*ø*
Output from Chrome Console:
console.log ("ø")
*ø*
conj can surely produce maps, and does so happily in the following cases:
(conj {} [:foo :bar])
(conj {} {:foo :bar})
I suggesting adding printlns or logging or a debugger and checking the
value of this-users-params, it is almost certainly not what you expect
it to be.
as a side note creating a
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:10 AM, larry google groups <
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (defn add-to-logged-in-registry [this-users-params]
> (let [right-now (. (Date.) getTime)
> new-user-entry (conj this-users-params { "updated" right-now })]
> (if (:username new-user-entry)
>
Frank demo'd a lot of this to the Bay Area Clojure Meetup tonight and it is
very cool stuff that makes development with ClojureScript a lot more
interactive and "natural". Great work!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Frank Siebenlist <
frank.siebenl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "cljs-info" is a collec
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Brian Craft wrote:
> C is a "C-language", and it seems a lot simpler than clojure to me. K&R is
> about 200 pages. I expect you mean C++, Java, etc.
No, I think Clojure is a lot simpler than C. As for C++, I was on the
standards committee for eight years so I kn
Assume data that looks like this:
{ziri {:last_name ziri, :image ziggy_stardust.jpg, :username larry,
:first_name larry, updated 1350626694791}, erich {:last_name 7ich,
:image 7ot_mein.jpg, :username erich, :first_name 754545_halle,
updated 1350626679436}}
When fed into th
45 matches
Mail list logo
