Hi,
Currently, counterclockwise is using classlojure to maintain separate
Leiningen environments for separate open projects.
HTH,
Laurent
Sent from a smartphone, please excuse the brevity/typos.
Le 31 août 2012 à 03:38, Dave Ray a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for the best way to execute som
https://github.com/hiredman/polycosm
On Aug 30, 2012 6:38 PM, "Dave Ray" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for the best way to execute some Clojure code in a more or
> less completely isolated environment. That is, say we load one piece
> of code:
>
> A:
> ---
> (ns my-ns)
>
> (def foo [] (println "hi
Does clojail [https://github.com/flatland/clojail] help in any way?
Regards,
BG
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Dave Ray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for the best way to execute some Clojure code in a more or
> less completely isolated environment. That is, say we load one piece
> of code:
>
>
Awesome!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send ema
Hi,
I'm looking for the best way to execute some Clojure code in a more or
less completely isolated environment. That is, say we load one piece
of code:
A:
---
(ns my-ns)
(def foo [] (println "hi"))
(foo)
---
if a second piece of code was loaded:
B:
---
(ns my-ns)
(foo) ; <-- This should fai
That statement of mine was confusing because if you type each you'll get
different things.
The equivalence of (define (foo) bar) === (define foo (lambda() bar)) won't
hold there: you'd be defining procedure A in the second case.
If the first argument is in parens, (define) will be a function def
Would an idiomatic definition of ((A)) be (defn fnA [] #(A))?
(defn a [] [:a :b])
(a)
; (a => fn) => [:a :b]
(defn funcA [] #(a))
(funcA)
; (funcA => fn)
((funcA))
; ((funcA)) => [:a :b]
Where you define a function which, when invoked, returns a function which,
when invoked, invokes A? This is a
Let's focus on that for a sec:
(define ((A)) 1) is the same as (define (A) (lambda () 1));;
defines procedure "(A)"
I wonder if you meant >>defines procedure "((A))"<< instead.
Assuming that, if "((A))" is just a name of the procedure, then
"A" and "(A)". Should not evaluate at all. Appa
Let's take it case by case.
(define A 1) is like (def A 1) in Clojure.
(define (A) 1) is like (defn A [] 1)
(define (A x y) (* x y)) as you'll expect, (defn A [x y] (* x y))
(define (A) 1) is the same as (define A (lambda () 1)) ;; defines
procedure "A"
(define ((A)) 1) is the same as (def
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Andy Coolware wrote:
> I use Rocket Scheme. The question was inspired by "Structure and
> Interpretation" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Op3QLzMgSY at almost
> end of the video @ 1:11:11
>
> I actually think that "((A))" is more just a symbol name since
> appar
I use Rocket Scheme. The question was inspired by "Structure and
Interpretation" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Op3QLzMgSY at almost
end of the video @ 1:11:11
I actually think that "((A))" is more just a symbol name since
apparently you define "A" not a "((A))"/ It is more like a
recursive/ne
I think reifying character output streams via an IWriter protocol sounds
like a good idea. Are you concerned about anything in particular wrt. to
introducing the IWriter protocol? If the protocol is Clojure destined we
may want to consider a more specific name to distinguish it from byte
oriented o
lein-pedantic is a lein plugin to eliminate common surprising
dependency resolution issues.
The rules lein-pedantic uses to fail a dependency resolution are approximately:
1. A top level dependency is overruled by another version.
2. A transitive dependency is overruled by an older version.
Usag
That's the definition of a procedure named "(A)". Scheme48, for one, won't
take that name, but Chicken will, even with parameters:
#;1> (define ((A) n) n)
#;2> ((A) 5)
5
And neither will, btw, bind a value to such a symbol in a (let). Clojure
symbols can't start with an open paren, so that's just
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
> Something like this?
>
> (defn A []
> 1)
>
> (defn A []
> (fn [] 1))
That would work but I wonder about how "(define ((A)) 1)" is evaluated
in Scheme and why similar and easier approach is not possible in
Clojure?
--
You received
Alan Busby writes:
>> Doesn't setting TERM=xterm restrict you to 8 colors? I have to use
>> TERM=xterm-256color.
>
> Evidently it does.
> I guess that's a trade off then, but I'm curious what you're doing
> that requires all those colors in a terminal?
"It's for the same reason we don't wear an
The promise of ClojureScript data structures depends heavily on the
performance of serialization: pr-str and the reader. I've done some
work on the reader and Evan has kindly created some patches for
pr-str. His work speeds up pr-str by quite a bit especially on slower
JS engines like <= IE8. Howev
> I sort of remember Rich Hickey say this, but I am not sure :).
I was a bit mistaken.
In this video (
http://blip.tv/clojure/clojure-data-structures-part-2-714064 ) , around
42nd minute, he says that assoc is "the normal way" and is "more
convenient" because you can assoc multiple keys and val
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Russell Whitaker <
russell.whita...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clojure is inherently shiny, no need to gild the lily.
yes but it has parenthesis
>
> What's the purpose and duration of your "code retreat"?
>
1 day
subjects are free
the public is 1/3 convinced by cloj
Clojure is inherently shiny, no need to gild the lily.
What's the purpose and duration of your "code retreat"?
Russell
On Monday, August 27, 2012 2:41:20 AM UTC-7, Denis Labaye wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am organizing a code retreat in September.
>
> All languages are accepted, I want to use Clojure f
Hi,
Re: ContentEditableField
ContentEditableFIeld has only recently been added to the Google Closure
Library
(http://code.google.com/p/closure-library/source/list?path=/trunk/closure/goog/editor/contenteditablefield.js&start=2035).
Are you sure that the version of the Google Closure Library t
I finally started trying some ClojureScript, hoping things would be working
and documented, but I'm still having a lot of trouble even getting a simple
app together.
cljs-build does a fair job at getting a working setup in a few minutes, but
there is still a lot of things that are "just because
Neocons is a feature rich idiomatic Clojure client for the Neo4J REST API.
Neocons 1.0.1 is a bug fix release that corrects an issue with node index
configuration not being
posted to the server correctly.
Full change log:
https://github.com/michaelklishin/neocons/blob/1.0.x-stable/ChangeLog.md
D
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Herwig Hochleitner wrote:
> 2012/8/27 Denis Labaye
>
>> Fetch JSON with clj-http AND extract informations from it with enlive.
>>
>> Does anyone know what's the most straightforward way to do that?
>>
>
> Enlive currently is tied to selecting and transforming XM
24 matches
Mail list logo
