Hello,
You'll need to include the source of the spel-print function, i.e. the
(defn spel-print ...) part of the code.
The error means that you're calling spel-print with either too many or too
few arguments. But we can't tell unless you provide the code for that
function :)
Regards,
Stuart
On 1
I am trying castin spels in clojure and I get this error. What does it
mean??
user=> (spel-print describe-paths 'living-room game-map)
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args (3) passed
to: user$spel-print (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)
==
code is
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 23:13 -0800, Simone Mosciatti wrote:
> Anyway, i'm looking for read a file byte by byte, perfect would be get
> a lazy-seq of every byte in the file, it's looks, for me, very weird
> that there isn't a built-in or some easy way to do that
The tradeoffs aren't universal enough
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Richard "Tiger" Melville
wrote:
> 4. Use bleeding edge lein to create the project
That's actually not the bleeding-edge version. But anyway, if you are
using your own custom shell script to launch swank it should be
irrelevant what leiningen version you use.
I'm
Thank you Anthony!
I'm happy that fs found a good home and I'm sure it'll be much more awesome
now.
Let the revolution begin! ;)
--
Miki
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
No
Spent a day with the getting started instructions - everything failed:
clojure-jack-in, cdt, package.el,
you name it.
This brute force method using M-x slime-connect is working for me:
1. eswank script
#!/bin/sh
LISPDIR=/usr/local/lisp
CLASSPATH="$LISPDIR/swank-clojure-1.4.0.jar:$LISPDIR/cloj
Yes - please disregard everyone. Local Artifactory repository was
getting in the way
On Dec 9, 2:55 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Richard "Tiger" Melville
>
> wrote:
> > bash-4.1$ lein plugin install swank-clojure 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT
> > [INFO] Unable to find resource
Hi,
total newbie here but what about conj?
(conj (conj (conj [ 1 2 3] 4) 6) 7)
would return
[1 2 3 4 6 7]
--
Marco Abis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that p
Hi Guys,
I'm pretty new of clojure so sorry for the maybe stupid question...
Anyway, i'm looking for read a file byte by byte, perfect would be get
a lazy-seq of every byte in the file, it's looks, for me, very weird
that there isn't a built-in or some easy way to do that, but I haven't
find noth
fs is a file system utilities library for Clojure. This library was
originally created by Miki Tebeka and resided at
https://bitbucket.org/tebeka/fs. Unfortunately, Miki recently found himself
having less time for Clojure and wasn't able to fix bugs and add new
features in a timely manner. Beca
This already works:
(extend-type js/Object ...)
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> Is there a technical reason that there is no (extend-type object ...)
> in ClojureScript?
>
> I just found myself implementing several protocols on the native
> object to get better host inter
All:
We are pleased to announce the Call for Participation
in the FOSDEM 2012 Free Java DevRoom!
This marks the 9th year that the Free Java DevRoom
has been a part of FOSDEM. http://fosdem.org/2012/
Saturday 4th and Sunday 5th of February 2012
Brussels, Belgium
The Free Java DevRoom has become u
On Dec 11, 8:15 am, blais wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why is it that defprotocol ignores type hints, while definterface
> deals with them? Both macros expand to a call to
> gen-interface--defprotocol just adds a bit more to that. I don't see
> why it wouldn't be possible.
>
> Is it just a historical artifact
Is there a technical reason that there is no (extend-type object ...)
in ClojureScript?
I just found myself implementing several protocols on the native
object to get better host interop, but it occurred to me that if it
was this easy, surely it would have already been done.
If there is no techni
Hi,
Why is it that defprotocol ignores type hints, while definterface
deals with them? Both macros expand to a call to
gen-interface--defprotocol just adds a bit more to that. I don't see
why it wouldn't be possible.
Is it just a historical artifact?
--
You received this message because you are
15 matches
Mail list logo
