On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know if theres a 1.3 compatible version of the
> clojure.contrib.gen-html-docs library at all? There's nothing listed under
> http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Contrib+Projects and with the version
> I was using
Hi all,
Does anyone know if theres a 1.3 compatible version of the
clojure.contrib.gen-html-docs library at all? There's nothing listed
under http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Contrib+Projects and with
the version I was using before ( from
org.clojure.contrib/gen-html-docs/1.3.0-alpha4 )
Hi Martin,
Thanks! Under the hood gantry uses rsync for the upload. See
https://github.com/drsnyder/gantry/blob/master/src/gantry/core.clj#L148.
Damon
On Jul 8, 1:30 am, martin_clausen wrote:
> Looks very nice. You should consider supporting rsync for the upload
> command.
>
> On Jul 6, 10:36 pm
On Jul 9, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Brian Hurt wrote:
> If there is an obvious way to rewrite the code using doseq or fold (or reduce
> or map or etc), then yes- you should do it. However, if this way to rewrite
> the code isn't obvious in 10 seconds of thought, don't worry about it. Use
> loop/recur.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
>
> There is currently no plan for a Clojure 1.3-compatible release of "old"
> clojure-contrib. However, if people with commit access to "old"
> clojure-contrib have time to fix all the little things that prevent it from
> building under 1.3, I
On Jul 9, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> If I need a function to have something like the following signatures,
> what's the most idiomatic way to do it:
>
> ([fn-arg str-arg vec-arg & others] ...)
> ([str-arg vec-arg & others] ...)
>
> Background: several functions in clojure.java.jdbc
Never mind. I figured out the problem. Somehow, one of the runs of
lein must have gotten interrupted in a way that left the compiled
duck-stream files corrupted in my classes directory. By manually
deleting the contents of the classes directory and starting fresh,
everything worked.
--Mark
--
Hey, if it does not take a year and an army of nuclear scientists to implement,
it would already
be better :
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:22:18 +0530
Vivek Khurana wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Luc Prefontaine
> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we should create something better than SAP :)
>
>
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Luc Prefontaine
wrote:
>
> Maybe we should create something better than SAP :)
Not exactly better than SAP, but I am working on a business
management framework based on clojure.
regards
Vivek
--
The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!!
--
You received
Maybe we should create something better than SAP :)
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 12:18:37 +1000
LordGeoffrey wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_software
> tl;dr
> model the entire enterprise.
>
> On 10/07/11 09:11, Andreas Kostler wrote:
> > What is generally considered "enterprise" then?
More specifically, it seems to be that clojure.contrib.duck-streams is
no longer being found even though the project.clj file is unchanged.
Was duck-streams removed from the monolithic 1.2.0 contrib build?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" grou
As of today, my lein uberjar command is no longer working on an
unchanged project that compiled perfectly three days ago. The errors
I'm getting seem to be suggesting that lein is no longer able to get
the contrib library for 1.2. Can anyone think of any reason why this
line:
:dependencies [[o
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_software
tl;dr
model the entire enterprise.
On 10/07/11 09:11, Andreas Kostler wrote:
What is generally considered "enterprise" then?
On 10/07/2011, at 9:07 AM, Sean Corfield wrote:
In which case, apologies to Shree... but those lists don't really
offer
i though all we needed was a sleek logo??? look forward to the clojure port
to LCARS. Please keep us updated (whoever has info)
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Andreas Kostler <
andreas.koestler.le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is generally considered "enterprise" then?
>
> On 10/07/2011, a
If I need a function to have something like the following signatures,
what's the most idiomatic way to do it:
([fn-arg str-arg vec-arg & others] ...)
([str-arg vec-arg & others] ...)
Background: several functions in clojure.java.jdbc are already
variadic but as part of JDBC-6 I want to enable use
What is generally considered "enterprise" then?
On 10/07/2011, at 9:07 AM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> In which case, apologies to Shree... but those lists don't really
> offer many companies that would generally be considered "enterprise"
> so I'm not sure how persuasive they would be (in either dire
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Colin Yates wrote:
> I think he was being sarcy :)
In which case, apologies to Shree... but those lists don't really
offer many companies that would generally be considered "enterprise"
so I'm not sure how persuasive they would be (in either direction :)
--
Sean A
To my knowledge Clojure has not yet been ported to LCARS[1]. This clearly
disqualifies it from being used in the Enterprise.
Phil
[1] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LCARS
On Jul 9, 2011 1:29 AM, "MarkH" wrote:
> As a tech lead or architect you should be fired for even suggesting to
> use Clojure
I think he was being sarcy :)
On 9 July 2011 22:03, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Shree Mulay wrote:
> > Clojure REALLY isn't ready for Enterprise level development.
>
> That's your opinion but I expect there are "enterprise" companies
> using Clojure already who just h
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Shree Mulay wrote:
> Clojure REALLY isn't ready for Enterprise level development.
That's your opinion but I expect there are "enterprise" companies
using Clojure already who just have a policy of not talking publicly
about their technology choices...
Again, your a
Clojure REALLY isn't ready for Enterprise level development.
see:
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Clojure+Success+Stories
http://www.quora.com/Whos-using-Clojure-in-production
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this g
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Benny Tsai wrote:
> Sorry, a bit late to the party here, but it might be worth taking a look
> at Jeffrey Straszheim's c.c.graph library to see one way of modeling DAG's
> and implementing various graph operations (such as topological sort and
> computing strongly c
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:29 AM, MarkH wrote:
> As a tech lead or architect you should be fired for even suggesting to
> use Clojure as an enterprise greenfield. Industry and academia is
> moving towards advanced type systems. Nobody in industry seriously
> considers Clojure for enterprise syste
On Friday, July 8, 2011 2:56:42 PM UTC+2, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
>
> I don't know of any way to have different SLIMEs in one Emacs. In the past
> I used to call Emacs with different init-files for that, but it's not nice.
>
That works, but requires one to restart Emacs every so often. Not so
Wow, Heroku really made a splash on Tuesday!
Phil
On Jul 9, 2011 9:57 AM, "James Estes" wrote:
> I thought some folks on this list might be interested in a mention
> graph I put up. It shows the # mentions of "clojure" across several
> sources (twitter, blogs, etc).
>
> http://twitpic.com/5nm8ve
Running the script will probably need Audi fwiw.
-Phil
On Jul 9, 2011 10:17 AM, "Stan Dyck" wrote:
> Another thing to try is this:
>
> 1. Bring up the vm with a vagrant up
> 2. Log in with vagrant ssh
> 3. Run the /vagrant/clojure_emacs.sh script directly on the vm
>
> That might not work either,
Another thing to try is this:
1. Bring up the vm with a vagrant up
2. Log in with vagrant ssh
3. Run the /vagrant/clojure_emacs.sh script directly on the vm
That might not work either, but at least you'll get some feedback about what fails from the script output. I'm curious
about why it's fail
On 9 Jul 2011, at 09:29, MarkH wrote:
> Industry and academia is moving towards advanced type systems.
I'm not even sure what this means - especially in the context of programming
languages. Industry and academia are orthogonal and have extremely different
goals. Perhaps one might perceive them
I thought some folks on this list might be interested in a mention
graph I put up. It shows the # mentions of "clojure" across several
sources (twitter, blogs, etc).
http://twitpic.com/5nm8ve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post t
Oops, correction: since the library already defines a struct called
directed-graph, it appears that you can't define a record of the same name.
So it'll have to be called something else:
(defrecord graph [nodes neighbors])
(def my-graph (graph. [:a :b] {:a [:b], :b [:a]}))
--
You received
Nice link - many thanks
On 9 July 2011 17:27, Benny Tsai wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> Sorry, a bit late to the party here, but it might be worth taking a look
> at Jeffrey Straszheim's c.c.graph library to see one way of modeling DAG's
> and implementing various graph operations (such as topological s
Hi Colin,
Sorry, a bit late to the party here, but it might be worth taking a look at
Jeffrey
Straszheim's c.c.graph library to see one way of modeling DAG's and
implementing various graph operations (such as topological sort and
computing strongly connected components) in Clojure:
API: http:
Well, I guess.
But I get the feeling that the iterator are probably coming from some java
object somewhere, and might get passed around in that environment, that's
why I'm worried.
In the examples you mentioned, line-seq for example. The reader has already
'escaped' since it is passed as an argume
he he :)
Well, conservative might be a run-of-the-mill Java/Spring/Hibernate
application with all of that fun as those are the tools which I am most
familiar with.
I am not going to type another long email, but it is interesting how people
define "risk" and "conservative". I *do not* think "doin
Well if it's a project you own then you're free to do whatever you
want, but if you're only an employee then I urge you to consider
carefully what you're about to do, and be as conservative as you could
be about it. :-)
On Jul 9, 2:15 pm, Colin Yates wrote:
> I did think about moving this logi
We have a complex messaging app in prod since Jan. 2009.
It's 24x7 and fully redundant. The high level functions are all in Clojure
and we are moving away from Java low level code written in the early days.
I have been writing complex software for 30 years now.
I found a way to decide what tools
> I don't think I like the notion of a lazy-seq and an iterator, since reading
> the iterator also changes it. Consider the case where you create a lazy-seq
> from an iterator, and the iterator somehow escapes. Somewhere else the
> iterator is read from, and now the data that where supposed to b
I don't think I like the notion of a lazy-seq and an iterator, since reading
the iterator also changes it. Consider the case where you create a lazy-seq
from an iterator, and the iterator somehow escapes. Somewhere else the
iterator is read from, and now the data that where supposed to be in the
la
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Christian Marks <9fv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm using recur, however some clojure programmers inform me that recur
> "should" be eliminated in favor of doseq or fold. I see nothing wrong
> with recur myself--am I missing
> something?
>
>
If there is an obvious way
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, stu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to make use of Java classes implementing the Java2D
> PathIterator interface:
>
>
> http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/awt/geom/PathIterator.html
>
> Which leads to a serious impedance mismatch between immutable Clojure
I did think about moving this logic to the database, but I am toying around
with a different model - having the entire data set in memory (possibly
across multiple nodes using messaging infrastructure to communicate). The
reason for this is:
- writes are very small but reads are very high
- eac
The clojure code below applies the constant space algorithm to apply a
permutation to an array of C. J. Gower to the computation of the order
of a permutation [Knuth, D. E., “Selected Papers on Analysis of
Algorithms,” CSLI Lecture Notes Number 102, CSLI Publications, (2000),
p 4]. The order of a p
On Jul 7, 4:58 pm, James Keats wrote:
> For people's sense of sanity, it's not wise to try to run before you
> walk. ... But fine, people are free to be impatient and get
> frustrated and depressed if they so insist.
I must respectfully disagree. I was interested in learning Clojure,
and decid
On Jul 9, 2011, at 3:29 AM, MarkH wrote:
> As a tech lead or architect you should be fired for even suggesting to
> use Clojure as an enterprise greenfield. Industry and academia is
> moving towards advanced type systems. Nobody in industry seriously
> considers Clojure for enterprise systems.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, MarkH wrote:
> As a tech lead or architect you should be fired for even suggesting to
> use Clojure as an enterprise greenfield. Industry and academia is
> moving towards advanced type systems. Nobody in industry seriously
> considers Clojure for enterprise syste
Hi Jonathon,
I did see that thread, but most of the (excellent and useful) advice was
around programming practices/idiomatic Clojure if I remember correctly. I
am for tool recommendations as well I guess.
I will re-read that thread though - thanks for the link.
Col
P.S. Is there a place (wiki
"Nobody in industry seriously considers Clojure for enterprise systems."
Your argument is internally inconsistent as I am in industry and seriously
considering Clojure for enterprise systems.
On 9 July 2011 09:29, MarkH wrote:
> As a tech lead or architect you should be fired for even suggesting
I agree not very constructive.
Re your comment, Backtype was just acquired by Twitter and they have built a
pretty decent system using clojure.
I saw another job ad not long ago for a clojure position at a wall street
bank. I think can't get more enterprise grade than that.
So maybe you want to
Maybe this would do:
https://gist.github.com/1073506
I should add that I have never used iterators, and that the code is untested
;)
Jonathan
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:10 AM, stu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to make use of Java classes implementing the Java2D
> PathIterator interface:
>
>
> http:
That's not very constructive at all.
I think clojure would work fine (or better) for enterprise applications. The
one thing that could pull it down is maintainability, as the maintainers
must know clojure.
There was recently a thread about working on large programs in clojure. It
might contain so
Hi,
I'd like to make use of Java classes implementing the Java2D
PathIterator interface:
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/awt/geom/PathIterator.html
Which leads to a serious impedance mismatch between immutable Clojure
data structures and the iterator's approach of calling next(
As a tech lead or architect you should be fired for even suggesting to
use Clojure as an enterprise greenfield. Industry and academia is
moving towards advanced type systems. Nobody in industry seriously
considers Clojure for enterprise systems.
On Jul 8, 12:43 pm, Colin Yates wrote:
> *This i
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Lee Spector wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Vivek Khurana wrote:
>
>> That is still not as easy as python. Running VM is a bigger overhead...
>
> There are different kinds of overhead. If the installation and setup of the
> VM is simple and bullet proof th
53 matches
Mail list logo
