Paul deGrandis writes:
> (defn create-session!
> "Create shared sessions and their associated channel.
> Arguments:
I've found the two-space indentation to be a brittle convention that's not
going to port well to other presentations of the text, or adapt well to
a change in the `doc' functio
I am trying to compile a project with lein uberjar.
My main function looks like:
(defn -main [& args]
(do
(require 'swank.swank)
(swank.swank/start-repl 4006))
(run-jetty main-routes {:port 8080 :join? false})
)
The compiler complains about swank.swank/start-repl because the swank
sym
Hello,
I'm not seeing clearly what you're after.
Given your example, it seems that it can be solved just by the following code:
=> (def e1 [{:a 1 :b "b" :c 300 }{:a 2 :b "a" :c 500 }])
(def e2 [{:a 1 :d "blah"}{:a 2 :d "blah2"}])
#'user/e1
#'user/e2
=> (map merge e1 e2)
({:d "blah", :a 1, :b
Sounds like a lot of detail oriented improvements. Regardless, you can
be sure I'll be using it when its done (or even if its not done yet,
I'd be happy to help with real world testing :) )
-Brent
On May 13, 3:57 pm, David Nolen wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Brent Millare wrote:
>
>
I've adopted:
(defn create-session!
"Create shared sessions and their associated channel.
Arguments:
some-req-arg - a vector, something descriptive.
[session-id] - a String, the session's identifier. [auto-generated
UUID]
Returns:
m - a MapEntry, the stored session
Notes:
I
Hi Ralph,
There's no established idiom beyond the guidelines at
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Library+Coding+Standards
I am not aware of any tool that parses Clojure docstrings for Javadoc-style
"@param" and "@return", although I would like to see that happen.
For now, Clojure docstrin
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Brent Millare wrote:
> However, you state here that you will build something more powerful
> than predicate dispatch. From the references you cited, I don't
> understand how you propose to accomplish this. The first paper says
> predicate dispatch is more generaliz
"After a bit of reading and prototyping, I'm quite
confident that it's possible to build something considerably more
powerful
than generic methods or predicate dispatch"
David,
I'm trying to understand some of the details of the big picture and
motivation. I was skimming through the first paper y
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Christopher Redinger wrote:
> You are correct, it was added in Alpha 7.
Thanx Christopher.
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getr
On Friday, May 13, 2011 3:03:11 PM UTC-4, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
> To save me digging into git commits, do you (or anyone else) happen to
>
> know for sure when "realized?" was added? It's not in the release
> notes below... I *think* it's new in Alpha 7...?
>
You are correct, it was added in Alph
Thank you!
To save me digging into git commits, do you (or anyone else) happen to
know for sure when "realized?" was added? It's not in the release
notes below... I *think* it's new in Alpha 7...?
Sean
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Christopher Redinger wrote:
> Clojure 1.3 Alpha 7 is now ava
Clojure 1.3 Alpha 7 is now available at
http://clojure.org/downloads
0 Changes from 1.3 Alpha 6 to 1.3 Alpha 7
1 Changes from 1.3 Alpha 5 to 1.3 Alpha 6
2 Changes from 1.3 Alpha 4 to 1.3 Alpha 5
3 Changes from 1.3 Alpha 3 to 1.3 Alpha 4
4 Changes from 1.3 Alpha 2 to 1.3 Alpha 3
5 Changes fr
Using the array-map sounds like a good work-around when you know there are
potential key collisions. It would also allow you to swap keys reliably using
a temporary key.
(rename-keys {:a 1 :b 2 :c 3} (array-map :a :tmp :b :a :tmp :b))
;; {:b 1, :a 2, :c 3}
The larger question is: Should ren
SWEET! Thank you David!
Fantastic job on the the logic programming by the way! I was so
excited to see this implemented in Clojure and cannot wait to dig into
this more.
I am eagerly awaiting the predicate dispatch and matching!
On May 13, 11:06 am, David Nolen wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 a
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Base wrote:
> It is possible to extend types at runtime to add new behavior
> dynamically?
>
Yes, an example here, http://dosync.posterous.com/51626638
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post
It is possible to extend types at runtime to add new behavior
dynamically?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
What is the idiomatic way to document defn's? In particular, should we use
"@param", "@returns", etc. to document parameters, return values, etc.
It might be good to have some standard way to specify expected parameter
types (other that type hints), especially for a dynamically typed language.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Heinz N. Gies wrote:
> Hearing Pattern Matching,
> do you mean Erlang like Pattern matching?
>
> Regards,
> Heinz
Erlang, OCaml, SML, Haskell, Scala all have the kind of pattern matching I'm
talking about. One important point is that they all support guards on
p
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Antony Blakey wrote:
>
> On 13/05/2011, at 2:21 PM, David Nolen wrote:
>
> > - instance? or custom predicate matches done w/ if
>
> I did quite a bit of this in the context of a Smalltalk implementation. One
> of the key features is fast type testing. I note in you
I am a Dolphin Smalltalk programmer.
I am making a multi dialect combination of Lisp and Smalltalk.
I would like to add something called ClojureLisp to it.
I think that I could learn a lot from your project.
But I don't know that I know enough of the right things to be able to
help you.
I spend all
With the structure:
test
- test1.clj
- test2.clj
then test1.clj should start with (ns test.test1) and test2.clj should start
with (ns test.test2)
Jonathan
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:15 AM, MohanR wrote:
> It is solved but the rules are not clear.
>
> If I have (ns test) in both .clj files and t
On 13/05/2011, at 2:21 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> - instance? or custom predicate matches done w/ if
I did quite a bit of this in the context of a Smalltalk implementation. One of
the key features is fast type testing. I note in your example case you are
relying on an id generic to provide the t
It is solved but the rules are not clear.
If I have (ns test) in both .clj files and the files are in /test then
I am able to call one from the other. I am not specifically pointing
my classpath to /test at all.
What is the link between classpath, ns and the folder structure ?
Thanks,
Mohan
--
23 matches
Mail list logo
