repos $ du -hc $(ls */lib/*.jar) | fgrep total
291Mtotal
Cost (on standard disks): < 5 cents.
Sorry, that's tiny. It's even less than 0.5% of the small SSD I have
in
my laptop.
Seriously, this is just premature optimization.
You're seriously fine with every single Leiningen-based proj
Hello Laurent,
On Mar 10, 11:45 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> * usage of refs : I had a bad feeling, and cgrand confirmed this to
> me by pointing an even more interesting counter-argument. Me: using
> refs is not mandatory since you do not need to synchronize this change
> with anything else.
I
Hi Mike,
On 10 March 2010 21:03, Mike Erickson wrote:
> I am writing a simple blackjack game in Clojure
I've written up a little commentary as to how I'd approach this
problem differently:
http://gist.github.com/328929
which hopefully will give you some ideas. The general thrust being to
keep yo
Richard Newman writes:
>> What benefit does this have aside from a tiny saving in disk space?
>
> Not that tiny when you multiply it across the dozens of projects on
> your hard drive.
>
> repos $ du -hc $(ls */lib/*.jar) | fgrep total
> 291M total
Cost (on standard disks): < 5 cents.
Sorry, t
What benefit does this have aside from a tiny saving in disk space?
Not that tiny when you multiply it across the dozens of projects on
your hard drive.
repos $ du -hc $(ls */lib/*.jar) | fgrep total
291Mtotal
Add to that the size of the Maven repo itself.
Symlinks are nice.
* you c
Brent Millare writes:
> Since leiningen downloads everything to a local repo, can't we do away
> with copies and use symlinks if they are supported by the filesystem?
> I feel there should be an option for this.
What benefit does this have aside from a tiny saving in disk space?
The way it curr
On 11 March 2010 17:15, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> You probably want to use conj instead of concat!
Actually ignore that! I was being confused by the deck-building.
Can you try running this code:
http://gist.github.com/328912
It is exactly the same as yours but uses known starting conditions...
and
Hi,
On Mar 11, 5:07 am, Brent Millare wrote:
> Since leiningen downloads everything to a local repo, can't we do away
> with copies and use symlinks if they are supported by the filesystem?
> I feel there should be an option for this.
Why not adding the files from the repo directly to the classp
On 11 March 2010 17:10, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> I tried running your code and it worked fine for me...
Ah excuse me it only 'worked' because I used vectors instead of lists:
> [5 \S]]] [:player []]), :house ([:house []]), :deck nil}
<--- should give you the clue you need,
You probably want to
On 10 March 2010 21:03, Mike Erickson wrote:
> but calling (deal 2 :house) bombs out with the following stacktrace:
Hi Mike,
I tried running your code and it worked fine for me... so I think
something else is playing tricks on you here like maybe you changed
the function in your text buffer but
Since leiningen downloads everything to a local repo, can't we do away
with copies and use symlinks if they are supported by the filesystem?
I feel there should be an option for this.
-Brent
On Mar 4, 1:59 pm, David Nolen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Stuart Sierra
> wrote:
>
> > As
I haven't tried removing the entire 6.8 directory (except in
conjunction with a complete reinstall of NetBeans), so I can't say
whether that should or should not work, but I have manually removed
the enclojure plugin via deleting the clojure-specific files and that
has gotten me out of a few jams.
You mean Clojurescript?
http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-contrib/tree/master/clojurescript/
It would be great to have more people working on it...
On Mar 9, 12:12 pm, Jozef Wagner wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> They seem to use java to generate (with GWT) both client-side html and
> javascript, an
On Mar 8, 5:50 pm, Jonathan Shore wrote:
> Now OO may be antithetical to the traditional way of using lisp, however, I
> see myself needing something close to an OO-style mapping for part of what I
> do. Currently my trading strategies have large and disparate state
> contained in each strate
Sorry I forgot to mention, please go to the site if you want to
support, by thumbs up or comment. There is a 100,000 euro prize and
500,000 euro investment for the top two ideas, I think this money
would go a long way to further fund the development of clojure and
Lisp aboption.
On Mar 10, 10:37
I like Clojure, but as a point of comparison, here's a Haskell
solution, as typed in the REPL:
Prelude> let bOf a = 1000*(500 - a)/(1000 - a)
Prelude> let nearInt x = x - fromInteger(truncate x) < 0.01
Prelude> head [ ( a, b, sqrt(a^2 + b^2) ) | a <- [1..], b <- [bOf a],
nearInt b ]
(200.0
No, I moved the entire 6.8 directory out of .netbeans and it still
didn't run. You still think I should focus on getting rid of just the
clojure files? Netbeans can't just rebuild that directory seeing as
it's not there anymore?
Josh
On Mar 9, 2:01 pm, Mark Nutter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010
Hi,
For Assembla, I first had to "watch" the Clojure space in order to
post a ticket. (It's a confusing interface.) Though it explicitly told
me I should, so perhaps that's not the problem you face.
For posting on clojure-dev, I asked about it on IRC and Rich added
me... I'm sure you can just ema
In a recent clojure:
user=> (class 2147483647)
java.lang.Integer
user=> (class (inc 2147483647))
java.math.BigInteger
user=> (class (inc (inc 2147483647)))
java.lang.Long
user=>
This isn't *technically* a bug, but it is an odd behavior.
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subsc
great! That's one thing I miss from time to time from Haskell.
Haskell has a physical unit library.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Konrad Hinsen
wrote:
> I have started working on a Clojure library for working with physical
> quantities that have units and dimensions. While there are still som
I have started working on a Clojure library for working with physical
quantities that have units and dimensions. While there are still some
important features missing, I consider the existing features
sufficiently stable. The library requires the current master branch of
the Clojure github
On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Glen Rubin wrote:
> However, the output of my trips function yields multiple collections
> of vectors inside of a larger vector. I am completely befuddled as to
> how to process this behemoth.
You can merge the structure into a single list of triples by applying con
Hi Glen,
When your are working with infinite sets in Clojure, is it better to
take advantage of laziness as far as possible, instead of passing
limits such as the coll argument to trips. Here's how I would think
about this problem:
(defn pairs-adding-to-n
"Pairs of distinct positive int
you can define a function to filter the result
like
(defn answer? [x] (filter #(every? integer? %) x))
and then just call it by doing
user=> (map #(answer? %) (trips (range 1 7)))
(() () ([3 4 5]) () ())
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Glen Rubin wrote:
> I am working on the following proble
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:31 PM, John R. Williams wrote:
> I have some patches I'd like to submit, but I'm having trouble with
> the submission process. I've sent in a CA, and my name is on the
> contributor list (at http://clojure.org/contributing), but I still
> can't submit tickets on Assembla
I have some patches I'd like to submit, but I'm having trouble with
the submission process. I've sent in a CA, and my name is on the
contributor list (at http://clojure.org/contributing), but I still
can't submit tickets on Assembla, and my membership to clojure-dev is
still pending. Do I need to n
I am working on the following problem:
Find the only Pythagorean triplet, {a, b, c}, for which a + b + c =
1000
My strategy is to produce a series of triplets of a^2 + b^2 and then
filter out the ones where the c^2 is a perfect square, in order to
determine Pythagorean triplets.
I wrote a fun
On Mar 4, 7:33 am, Jan Rychter wrote:
> I haven't hacked on new Clojure stuff for the past two months or
> so. Now, having updated my repositories, I find that everybody just
> dropped ant and moved to leiningen.
>
> I tried to make sense of things, but can't. I must be missing something
> big h
It does it matter to me how it gets written (C# or ClojureCLR)
The desire is to have a plugin that supports syntax highlighting,
completion, debugging, etc. but what I really am looking for is
something that can manage repl(s) that can load the libraries for a
given solution or set of projects (sim
I am seeing a difference in running the contents of a function vs.
running the function by name in a REPL. I am writing a simple
blackjack game in Clojure, and have a ref called 'cards' for
representing the state of the game. I initialize it this way:
user> (dosync (alter cards assoc
:deck (bu
CL's defparameter corresponds to plain def.
There is a level of structure you are not representing: alternatives.
Here is what I'd use:
:sentence [[:noun-phrase :verb-phrase]]
...
:article ["the" "a"]
...
The string literals are the implicit terminals and are thus easy to
distinguish. An articl
Oops, sorry, I thought my post was stuck in the moderation queue and
have only just noticed the replies while browsing through the list
history! Thanks to everyone who replied.
Your version looks to be about six times faster than mine was. Thanks
ever so much!
In fact I wouldn't have noticed the d
On 10 March 2010 02:19, K. wrote:
> How should I compare two persistent lists ?
Is it acceptable for you to use '='
user=> (= '(1 2) '(3 4))
false
user=> (= '(1 2) '(1 2))
true
or do you really really need the +1 0 -1 behavior?
Is there any problem with ISeq requiring compareTo? In principal I
2010/3/10 Steve Purcell :
> On 9 Mar 2010, at 23:22, Michał Marczyk wrote:
>
>> In the way of early feedback -- that's looks super neat! I've got this
>> instant feeling that this would be a great clojure.contrib.memoize.
>
>
> +1
>
> That would be wonderful.
Well, in the way of early feedback too
On 9 Mar 2010, at 23:22, Michał Marczyk wrote:
> In the way of early feedback -- that's looks super neat! I've got this
> instant feeling that this would be a great clojure.contrib.memoize.
+1
That would be wonderful.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group
35 matches
Mail list logo
