On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 08.08.2009 um 02:52 schrieb samppi:
> >
> >> Great, thanks. Is clojure.lang.Var/pushThreadBindings a public,
> >> supported part of the API? Can I use it without fear
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Mark Engelberg wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:14 PM, John Harrop wrote:
> > (if (and (not (= 0 i)) (< (+ zr2 zi2 limit-square)))
>
> I believe that (zero? i) is faster than (= 0 i).
On primitive ints? Have you tested it?
--~--~-~--~~-
Andy,
I just thought I'd mention that for 80 cents you can rent an hour on an
8-core EC2 machine with 7GB of RAM. We use EC2 a lot for such things at
work. It may be an easy way for you to accomplish your goals.
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/
Chad Harrington
chad.harring...@gmail.com
On Aug 7, 1:43 am, Daniel wrote:
> IIRC you can use plain HTML on the github pages. They are only
> processed by Jekyll, if you have the YAML front-matter in the file
> (http://wiki.github.com/mojombo/jekyll/usagesee index.html section).
Yup, I'm skipping the Jekyll and doing vanilla HTML + CSS
On Aug 8, 2009, at 3:37 AM, Albert Cardona wrote:
> I am amused that the two answers I got (yours and Vagif's) tried to
> teach me about contrib duck-streams, a lib which I know and use.
>
> To restate my point: file I/O is incomplete in clojure core, lacking
> the
> consistency of other core
> Great! - I need to think about this, and will follow up after I get
> back from vacation.
>
Cool. No hurry, I have plenty of other stuff to clean up in autodoc
and work to do to make it non-contrib specific.
Have a great vacation!
Tom
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Hi,
Am 08.08.2009 um 15:52 schrieb Rich Hickey:
get-/push-/pop-thread-bindings wrapping Var.get/push/popThreadBindings
would be a welcome issue/patch.
Note the addition of getThreadBindings(), which returns a map of all
the current bindings. This could be used to define a
function-returning ma
Hi Brad,
I think that there is no global lock for heap allocation, at least for
small objects.
As a support for this claim:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp09275.html
(see more specifically: "Thread-local allocation", but the article is
really interesting as a whole.)
I am
> I'm not sure how to determine why calling 'new Double' each time
> through NewDoubleTest's inner loop causes 2 threads to perform not
> much better than 1. The best possible explanation I've heard is from
> Nicolas Oury -- perhaps we are measuring the bandwidth from cache to
> main memory, not
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:50 AM, cody koeninger wrote:
>
> Assuming people aren't patching clojure ala dave griffith's external
> transactions patch in the group files, what are people doing in
> practice to durably store the state of refs?
>
> Storing within a transaction and somehow ensuring you
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Andy Fingerhut <
andy_finger...@alum.wustl.edu> wrote:
> > What I suggest is
> >
> > (loop [zr (double 0.0)
> >zi (double 0.0)
> >i (int (inc iterations-remaining))]
> > (let [zr2 (* zr zr)
> > zi2 (* zi zi)]
> > (if (and (not (= 0 i))
My thought we to use the test cases as a specification for the desired
behavior.
1. Assume that the following case is desired behavior
[:a 1 2 :b 3] [[:a [1 2]] [:b 3]]
My thought was that "If it's a seq, flatten it". That lead me to
develop the test case above. Here's how it works explicit
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
>
>> Tom, are you amenable?
>
> Yup, happy to. Where should it go?
>
> I'm generating real html now, not wiki-text (for a bunch of reasons,
> among them the ability to download a tree and use your browser
> offline, old version support, etc.), s
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 08.08.2009 um 02:52 schrieb samppi:
>
>> Great, thanks. Is clojure.lang.Var/pushThreadBindings a public,
>> supported part of the API? Can I use it without fear of suddenly
>> dropped support?
>
> It is was `binding` uses intern
Johann, if you are still following this thread, could you try running
this Clojure program on your 8 core machine?
http://github.com/jafingerhut/clojure-benchmarks/blob/3e45bd8f6c3eba47f982a0f6083493a9f076d0e9/misc/pmap-testing.clj
These first set of parameters below will do 8 jobs sequentially,
Hi,
Am 08.08.2009 um 07:36 schrieb Sean Devlin:
In my opinion, flatten to behave more like this:
http://gist.github.com/164291
May I ask a stupid question?
What is the use of this case:
[:a 1 2 :b 3] {:a [1 2] :b 3}
Wouldn't it be more useful to flatten
only depending on the outer
Hi,
Am 07.08.2009 um 20:55 schrieb Andy Chambers:
Does clojure have an equivalent of either CLOS's `call-next-method' or
java's super?
You can use get-method.
(derive ::Foo ::Bar)
(derive ::Foo ::Frob)
(defmulti do-something
type)
(defmethod do-so
Hi,
Am 08.08.2009 um 02:52 schrieb samppi:
Great, thanks. Is clojure.lang.Var/pushThreadBindings a public,
supported part of the API? Can I use it without fear of suddenly
dropped support?
It is was `binding` uses internally. Unfortunately
this is not exported by Clojure's public API. I -
unf
Daniel Lyons wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Albert Cardona wrote:
>
>> Currently, one must resort to incantations like:
>>
>> (with-open [stream (java.io.BufferedReader.
>> (java.io.FileReader.
>> "/home/albert/test.xml"))]
>> (doseq [line (line
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:14 PM, John Harrop wrote:
> (if (and (not (= 0 i)) (< (+ zr2 zi2 limit-square)))
I believe that (zero? i) is faster than (= 0 i).
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure"
20 matches
Mail list logo
