On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:29:44 +0100
Jon Harrop wrote:
>
> On Saturday 20 June 2009 08:34:39 Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> > What't TPL?
>
> The Task Parallel Library. It uses concurrent wait-free work-stealing
> queues to provide an efficient implementation of "work items" than
> can spawn other work i
Was it a deliberate decision to make io! optional or is this by
accident? I know it came in later
I guess it's hard to do considering all access to Java would have to
be categorized, which is impossible, I guess.
It just seems like Clojure loses a lot by not guaranteeing side-effect-
freeness, l
groovy has made much progress in this front, due to Andres Almiray's mad
skill and dedication. He almost has the FXBuilder generating
JavaFX 1.2 code from groovy.
So I'm sure there is much that can be learned here.
http://www.jroller.com/aalmiray/entry/another_look_at_fxbuilder_griffon
On Sat,
Thanks! I was bitten by the underscore and dashes thing in the package
name/filesystem.
This example fortunately had that to show me the way to do it.
Thanks for your help.
On Jun 19, 10:42 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 1:02 PM, timshawn wrote:
>
> > Hello clojure develop
> I recall an interview I heard on the Java Posse podcast with some
> members of the JavaFX team. They were talking about inquiries they'd
> received from the various JVM Language communities (e.g., Scala and
> Groovy) regarding interop. The interviewer asked about Clojure and
> they said
Kedu CuppoJava,
Join this class ♫
javafxprogramm...@googlegroups.com
And learn Fx. I was there for a few days before I drifted.
Regards,
Emeka
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:51 PM, CuppoJava wrote:
>
> I'm still not very clear about what JavaFX actually is and what's its
> relation to Java. Do you k
On Jun 20, 2009, at 12:51 PM, CuppoJava wrote:
I'm still not very clear about what JavaFX actually is and what's its
relation to Java. Do you know of any links that explain it clearly?
The homepage (http://javafx.com) has information along those lines.
See also http://www.google.com/search?q
I'm still not very clear about what JavaFX actually is and what's its
relation to Java. Do you know of any links that explain it clearly?
-Patrick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To p
On Jun 20, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Rob wrote:
I've been running some experiments to see if I can get a JavaFX GUI by
calling the JavaFX classes from Clojure. Basically, it's a pain in
the ass, because I haven't found a documented Java API. I'm hoping
that they publish something at some point, so t
Hi all,
I've been running some experiments to see if I can get a JavaFX GUI by
calling the JavaFX classes from Clojure. Basically, it's a pain in
the ass, because I haven't found a documented Java API. I'm hoping
that they publish something at some point, so that you don't have to
learn yet ano
On Saturday 20 June 2009 08:34:39 Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On 19.06.2009, at 10:35, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > If you really do mean scientific applications in general (e.g.
> > Mathematica,
> > MATLAB) then I would say that they are definitely almost all
> > running on
> > multicore desktops and not dis
On Jun 20, 3:34 am, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On 19.06.2009, at 10:35, Jon Harrop wrote:
>
> > If you really do mean scientific applications in general (e.g.
> > Mathematica,
> > MATLAB) then I would say that they are definitely almost all
> > running on
> > multicore desktops and not distribu
On 19.06.2009, at 10:35, Jon Harrop wrote:
> If you really do mean scientific applications in general (e.g.
> Mathematica,
> MATLAB) then I would say that they are definitely almost all
> running on
> multicore desktops and not distributed clusters.
What I really meant is "scientific applica
On Jun 19, 4:18 pm, Berlin Brown wrote:
> On Jun 19, 1:50 pm, Berlin Brown wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 19, 1:04 pm, Four of Seventeen wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 19, 10:12 am, BerlinBrown wrote:
>
> > > > 574 instances of class clojure.lang.DynamicClassLoader
>
> > > That is curious. Ordinarily one on
14 matches
Mail list logo