On Oct 26, 2008, at 9:36 PM, Matthew D. Swank wrote:
> Not if you are using OS-X on a PPC mac.
Or a 32-bit Intel Mac like the original Macbook Pros...
--Steve
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cloj
On Oct 26, 7:47 pm, verec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Even us in OS X
> land have had access to 1.6 for nearly as long as clojure has been
> made public :-)
> --
> JFB
Not if you are using OS-X on a PPC mac.
Matt
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message be
Given the total lack of generics use in the code (did someone notice a
that I missed :-) and the fact that java.util.concurrent.*
originated as a separate, non core java library, you might as well
want to specifiy 1.4 ...
Just kidding, of course ... What's wrong with 1.6? Even us in OS X
land ha
On Oct 26, 3:49 pm, Phil Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having some trouble with existing code after a recent svn update. I
> think it must have happened sometime in the last 2 or so weeks, but it
> might be slightly longer.
>
> The problematic code can be reduced to this:
>
> u
I'm new at Clojure, but from trying it out it seems really cool.
I have a minor request—when a list is evaluated and its first argument
is nil, a NullPointerException occurs. This took me a while to debug
when I had put (some-fn 3), and some-fn happened to be nil in some
cases.
Could a clearer,
> I was wondering if there is an argument against using initialize ==
> true in all cases?
Here are a couple of examples, in the strictly java world (java
programming language and vm) when you want initialize to be false.
The idiomatic use case being byte code analysis
* FindBugs
* Code obfuscat
Hi,
I'm having some trouble with existing code after a recent svn update. I
think it must have happened sometime in the last 2 or so weeks, but it
might be slightly longer.
The problematic code can be reduced to this:
user=> (def mylocals ['A (fn [] "foo")])
#=(var user/mylocals)
user=> (defma
On Oct 26, 2:48 pm, ".Bill Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I applaud everyone who has volunteered to help write tests for
> Clojure. A good test suite not only catches problems but also helps
> beginners learn the language.
>
> Regarding the proposal in the previous post, I think we should
I applaud everyone who has volunteered to help write tests for
Clojure. A good test suite not only catches problems but also helps
beginners learn the language.
Regarding the proposal in the previous post, I think we should be
careful about drawing inferences between the use of random values and
Dear Clojurians,
Stuart brought up the idea of implementing a QuickCheck clone
for Clojure. I think that this is a good idea, since it provides
a much better coverage of possible inputs. I gave it some thought
this weekend and the following is, what I came up with. There
are some specifics of the
On Oct 26, 11:18 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RT/classForName currently hardwires the "initialize" option of
> Class.forName to false. In working with jdbc drivers, the need to
> initialize classes in some circumstances came up--in some JRE
> configurations, the driver c
RT/classForName currently hardwires the "initialize" option of
Class.forName to false. In working with jdbc drivers, the need to
initialize classes in some circumstances came up--in some JRE
configurations, the driver class needs to be initialized explicitly to
work.
I don't understand al
When you build Clojure from SVN using the ant file, it defaults to
compiling the class files for the highest version of Java available on
your system. So if you have Java 1.6, the clojure.jar file you make
will be inaccessible to people with only Java 1.5. Since Clojure is
for Java 1.5 and 1.6, it
On Oct 26, 1:48 pm, "Matti Jagula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Krukow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am kind of embarrassed to ask this, but is there a "correct way" to
> > do this . Do you simply re-def a function, e.g., to time execution:
>
> def-s are not t
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Krukow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am kind of embarrassed to ask this, but is there a "correct way" to
> do this . Do you simply re-def a function, e.g., to time execution:
def-s are not transactional, so you have to be careful yourself. Also,
from what I under
source: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/web/2dplot.clj
screenshot: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/web/2dplot.png
;; Ever wanted to visualise some simple shapes but don't have matlab
handy?
;; Here is one way to do it!
;; Comes with some default shapes to demonstrate,
;; but I recom
16 matches
Mail list logo
