Hi,
No doubt many individuals interested in Clojure are aware of its
Wikipedia entry, though I just now found it.
It's a pretty terse page, including only a single paragraph of actual
content (its history page is longer...) and could probably stand some
elaboration. E.g., Clojure's STM and ot
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/2865#comment-42428
maybe an approach which would be a not-very-big-diff-to-Clojure to get
distributed computing.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
T
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Allen Rohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is one weakness with the comment macro; the Reader has to be
> happy with the body of the comment. Including things like # in the
> comment body can upset the reader and cause your file to not compile.
Yeah, that
> > 2) Balanced-boundary (non-EOL-terminated) comments. Whether the syntax
> > is #| ... |# (á là Common Lisp) or /* ... */ (C- and Java-like) or
> > something else, I don't much care, but I think both line-terminated and
> > balanced comments are called for. Likewise, whether balanced-boundary
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to add:
>
> 2) Balanced-boundary (non-EOL-terminated) comments. Whether the syntax
> is #| ... |# (á là Common Lisp) or /* ... */ (C- and Java-like) or
> something else, I don't much care, but I think both line
On Sep 16, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 16, 11:12 am, Matt Revelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rich,
>>
>> Should I send in a CA and add ancestry verification and error
>> handling
>> or is this an unacceptable change?
>>
>
> I'm amenable to the idea, but I haven't look
Hi all,
I am porting [1] the Practical Common Lisp examples [2] to Clojure,
and blogging notes [3] as I go. Feedback of all kinds is most welcome,
and I hope that some folks here will find this useful.
Cheers,
Stuart
[1] http://github.com/stuarthalloway/practical-cl-clojure
[2] http://gigam
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 13:39, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 September 2008 11:40, Rich Hickey wrote:
> > As we rapidly approach 500 members on the group (!) I thought it
> > would be a good time to conduct another poll:
> >
> >
> > What are you doing with Clojure?
>
> Tinkering
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Alexander Kjeldaas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2. Clojure states that it has good support for list comprehensions.
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding list comprehensions, but I'm not completely
> happy. I want a way to have destructuring work on the sequence, not
> o
On Sep 16, 7:41 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 12:26 am, Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > It appears that ns-resolve only resolves alias qualified symbol in
> > current clojure/*ns*, but not in the namespace passed as argument.
>
> Fixed - thanks for the r
On Sep 16, 11:12 am, Matt Revelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rich,
>
> Should I send in a CA and add ancestry verification and error handling
> or is this an unacceptable change?
>
I'm amenable to the idea, but I haven't looked at the specifics,
holding off on changes pre-release. Please do s
Rich,
Should I send in a CA and add ancestry verification and error handling
or is this an unacceptable change?
-Matt
On Sep 15, 12:22 am, Matt Revelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I modifed clojure/genclass to support adding exposer methods for
> protected fields in classes higher up the hie
On Sep 16, 10:15 am, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 07:00, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> >http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=137961
>
> > Added: validators for vars/refs/agents, delay/force, isa-based
> > multimethods and a la carte hierarc
d many more functions and fixes.
>
> Special thanks to Chas Emerick, Graham Fawcett, Stephen C. Gilardi,
> Chris Houser and Stuart Sierra for their contributions, and to
> everyone here for your suggestions and bug reports.
>
> More details at:
>
> http://clojure.blogspot.com
On Sep 16, 9:48 am, markm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 7:51 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > The workaround I came up with fails to filter the bridge method in
> > org.jscience.physics.amount.Amount. I'm still looking into this issue.
>
> >http://groups.google.
ich.
> More details at:
>
> http://clojure.blogspot.com/2008/09/20080916-release.html
>
> Rich
Randall Schulz
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this
On Sep 16, 7:51 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> The workaround I came up with fails to filter the bridge method in
> org.jscience.physics.amount.Amount. I'm still looking into this issue.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages/browse_frm/thread/a64c75...
>
> Rich
Be
. Gilardi,
Chris Houser and Stuart Sierra for their contributions, and to
everyone here for your suggestions and bug reports.
More details at:
http://clojure.blogspot.com/2008/09/20080916-release.html
Rich
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
On Sep 10, 8:40 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As we rapidly approach 500 members on the group (!) I thought it would
> be a good time to conduct another poll:
>
> What are you doing with Clojure?
>
I'm doing useless stuff with Clojure.
> What 3 features would you most like to se
19 matches
Mail list logo
