Re: [Clamav-users] SCO virus - Clam 0.65

> As the reply to is spoofed, this makes no sense at all (and i am getting > lots of bounces). How do we stop this happening? if it's clamav-milter: - do away with the smfi_setreply statement (at or near line 1524) - set 'rc = SMFIS_DISCARD;' (instead of SMFID_REJECT) (at or near line 1522)

Re: [Clamav-users] all this "complaining" about 0.65 vs CVS ...

On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:53:48AM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote: [...] > just one man's opinion. you are not alone - heartily seconded! -- --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Inte

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating.

> SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES from the *fine* manual (docs/node10.html): __cut__ The following packages are optional but highly recommended: [...] GNU MP 3 It's very important to install the GMP package because it allows freshclam to verify the digital

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating.

> ClamAV update process started at Mon Apr 19 10:16:50 2004 > SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES > > That's all it does. btw: nothing in the log(s)? -- Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating.

> Strange that it used to update perfectly. I haven't changed a thing. Is > this package really neccesary for freshclam? for the warning to go away: yes. as far as i can see in the code (freshclam/manager.c-downloadmanager()) the warning is not meant to hinder downloads though. if you have dow

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating.

> -- > ClamAV update process started at Tue Apr 20 06:30:00 2004 > SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES > main.cvd is up to date (version: 22, sigs: 20229, f-level: 1, builder: > tkojm) > daily.cvd is up to date (version: 269, sigs: 927, f-level: 1

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating.

> Because when I entered "freshclam" before, it used to update in 10 > seconds. Now I can wait for hours when I enter "freshclam" manually and > still nothing. oh. :-( here it takes 2 to 5 seconds, just tried; i would expect your problem to be related to a dns/proxy/firewall issue, not to fresh

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav error

> In which way 0.68 (our running version) is "OUTDATED" ? CL_FLEVEL is still1 (2 in 0.70) in libclamav/others.c that's why the developers told us to upgrade on or before 04-24, iirc... -- Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachme

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamav-milter, kill pid not working

> in linux: killall -qw /path/to/clamav-milter here (slack 9.1,, 2.4.24, sendmail 8.12.10) clamav-milter never honours a TERM signal (which is sent by killall by default). it always has to be SIGKILL'ed. i get bad feelings when testing... ;-) -- -

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd crash triggered by THIS list

On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 01:41:08AM -0500, Damian Menscher wrote: > May 31 11:36:23 astro clamd[1002]: Segmentation fault :-( Bye.. > So... the message that broke it was sent to this list, specifically the > message from Samuel Benzaquen with timestamp: > Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 11:16:12 -0400

[Clamav-users] double quarantine?

since rc3, maybe caused by my adapting all new config files, mails containing virus' are kept twice in quarantine; once as 'msg.xx' and once as 'msg.xx.virusname'. most likely i did something stupid and/or misread some new documentation. (slackware 9.1, sendmail 8.12.10, 0.80rc3 with

[Clamav-users] milter version

when i enter 'clamd -V' i get a version line reflecting the i get a version line indicating the current database version, eg .../535/..., currently. the clamav-milter X-Virus-Scanned lines, however, seem to reflect the version feedback of clamd when the milter was started, not the current one

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter kill

not a bug, but maybe a samll wish for a small feature: being a devout user of clamav-milter, and changing my clamav package ever so often upon the current recommendations of the development team, i always try to shutdown sendmail, calamav-milter, freshclam, and clamd prior to replacing the cla

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd performance on Solaris vs Linux

On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:11:26AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote: > clamAV does a LOT of malloc/frees especially when decoding emails. maybe dlmalloc could help? -- Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/

[Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

i am running freshclam as a daemon with 25 updates a day. was always running smooth and reliably. :-) since .81rc1, however, freshclam kind of 'freezes' after an update; though it seemingly updates the database, it doesn't notify clamd, as per freshclam.log and clamd.log, and it no longer get

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote: [...] > /* #define SESSION */ /* [...] > recompile, install, restart, and let us know if it fixes the problem. thank you - done. i'll wait for the next few updates and let you know. -- ___ h

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:47:41PM +, Nigel Horne wrote: > Are you running BSD? sorry for having left out information i thought not relevant: slack 9.1, sendmail 8.12.10, gcc 3.2.3, libc 2.3.2. board is 440bx-ish, pentium-ii (deschutes) stepping 2. -- __

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 02:12:49PM +, Nigel Horne wrote: > > slack 9.1, > Is that Linux? Interesting, I've never heard of this problem > on Linux, only BSD. it's a vanilla 2.4.26 linux kernel. and: i *never* had freshclam hangs before .81rc1, and on two out of three db updates since. -- __

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote: [...] > /* #define SESSION */ /* > * Keep one command connection open to clamd, otherwise > a new * command connection is created for each new email > */ > > recompile, install, restart,

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter .83

using clamav-milter .83 i get: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on ... while using .82 i got: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.82/databaselevel/databasedate on ... i thought the .82 contents quite interesting - maybe the two info types could be merged, somehow, i

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter .83

[...] > > X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on ... [...] > > That is because SESSION is no longer used by default. oh - i misread the man page then: "The default build is for SESSION to be enabled." ;-) anyway - thanks! --

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter .83

> > using clamav-milter .83 i get: > > X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on ... > > while using .82 i got: > > X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.82/databaselevel/databasedate on ... > > > > i thought the .82 contents quite interesting - maybe the two info types > >

Re: [Clamav-users] No announcement of 0.83 on clamav-announce ML

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:40:42PM -0700, Hal Goldfarb wrote: > [...] I also think RPM binaries > should be made available before an official release. [...] please not! -- ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam and milter --internal notification

On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:47:53AM -0600, Damian Menscher wrote: [...] > freshclam[26975]: ERROR: Clamd was NOT notified: No socket specified in > /usr/local/encap/clamav-0.83/etc/clamd.conf may freshclam.conf still contains a 'NotifyClamd directive? or rather, the invocation of freshclam specifi

[Clamav-users] clamav milter: loading new database

i am running .83, clamav-milter w/o clamd, freshclam on slack 9.1. low load, but persistent flow of incoming messages ( a few hundred mails a day, no bad peaks). normally, shortly after a successful freshclam update, clamav milter logs a 'loading new database' message and the x-virus-scanned li

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav milter: loading new database

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:02:14AM +, Nigel Horne wrote: > Update to at least 0.83b. would this be in the nightly snapshots (ie clamav-devel)? -- ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

[Clamav-users] 84rc1 freshclam onupdateexecute

84rc1 (same in cvs) freshclam, manager.c: __cut__ if(optl(opt, "on-update-execute")) arg = getargl(opt, "on-update-execute"); else if((cpt = cfgopt(copt, "OnUpdateExecute"))) arg = cpt->strarg; if(arg) { if(optc(opt, 'd')) exec

Re: [Clamav-users] OnOutdatedExecute

On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:15:33AM +, Mark wrote: > Anyone? :) I'd really like to know, before I implement this new option. a look into freshclam/manager.c could help you here, i think. -- ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by clamav

> What version are you using? I am using and updated 87.1, and I think > that this version is not working. my clamscan (87.1/1213) definitely finds it here (Worm.Sober.U). -- ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html