[Clamav-users] Some more evidence for my last mail ...

2004-03-02 Thread Thomas Seifert
Hey there, in my last mail I told that clamscan founds the virus while clamd doesn't. Here's some more evidence for this: sh-2.04$ /usr/local/clamav-0.67/bin/clamscan ./your_archive.pif ./your_archive.pif: Worm.SomeFool.B-petite FOUND --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Known viruses: 20355 Scann

[Clamav-users] netsky-d found by clamscan but not by clamd?

2004-03-02 Thread Thomas Seifert
hey folks, I'm running clam-av 0.67 in combination with amavisd-new. With nearly never a virus slipping through, thanks to the devs. But recently a lot of viruses started to slip through. Checking it on the same machine, extracting the attachment by hand it is detected by clamscan, so it must be c

Re: [Clamav-users] Some more evidence for my last mail ... - SOLVED

2004-03-02 Thread Thomas Seifert
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:15:19 -0500 Mike Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas, > > On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 14:09, Thomas Seifert wrote: > > in my last mail I told that clamscan founds the virus while clamd doesn't. > > Here's some more evidence for th

[Clamav-users] Re: Some more evidence for my last mail ... - SOLVED

2004-03-03 Thread Thomas Seifert
Tomasz Kojm wrote: I believe clamscan don't read clamav.conf at all; It uses hard-coded compiled settings. I might be wrong :) You're right - it doesn't depend on clamav.conf at all. May I suggest a change then please? Either name it clamd.conf to describe for what its used or please use the c