On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 17:42, Paul Carpenter wrote:
> I use logrotate on my RedHat system with:
>
> /var/log/clamd.log {
> missingok
> create 0640 clamav root
> prerotate
> /sbin/service clamd stop 2> /dev/null || true
> endscript
> postrotate
>
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 20:49, Andrew Mills wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> [snip]
>
> > I would like to second that request. Does anyone on the list have a .spec
> > file that they would like to contribute?
>
> One can be found on the Fedora.us web site under
> http://www.fedora.us/tempspecs/ as wel
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 11:00, LOYET Jerome wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are 0.67 and 0.67-1 stable?
> If yes, Why are they not in stable download section?
>
Uhm, they _are_ in the stable download section... (as of 15th and 16th
of February respectively)
--
Tarjei
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 15:41, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> But I couldn't find an answer in my quick glances through the archives.
>
> Is there any way to tell clamav-milter to simply REJECT messages which
> are found to be infected?
>
No, because that's the default behaviour :) clamav-milter will
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 08:21, Jaap Scholten wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running clamav 0.67-1 (up from 0.65) on RedHat 8.0. I still get
> "segmentation error :-( Bye", seemingly randomly, and clamd stops dead.
> Sometimes up for days before this happens, sometimes after an hour. Never
> on-the-hour when
The freshclam daemon process died the other day, and the last entry in
my log looks like:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Feb 18 06:51:56 2004
ERROR: Can't connect to port 80 of host database.clamav.net
(193.1.219.100)
ERROR: Connection with database.clamav.net (IP: 193.1.219.100) failed.
Try
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 19:30, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On 25 Feb 2004 11:32:20 +0100
> Tarjei Knapstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm running 0.67-1. Is there any way I can make freshclam recover a
> > bit more gracefully than just dying? (or is it a bug?)
&g
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 16:20, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:13 PM, Steven P. Donegan wrote:
>
>
> This is assuming everyone's clocks are set in sync? :-)
>
You don't use ntpd? :)
--
Tarjei
---
This SF.Net email is sp
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 21:03, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:28:53 -0500
> "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --
> > ClamAV update process started at Sun Mar 7 17:31:59 2004
> > ERROR: Maximal time (1200 seconds) reached.
>
> We are awar
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 08:26, B. van Ouwerkerk wrote:
> >Hello
> >
> >Just a question about lastest clamav version.
> >
> >I just downloaded clamav 0.73 and I found CVS directory in each directory.
> >It is normal ?
>
> If a .tgz is created from CVS without any modifications then it's normal.
> No
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 08:28, Erik Slooff wrote:
> I'm still seeing the following compile errors with 0.80rc2:
>
> mbox.c: In function `getURL':
> mbox.c:2735: `CURLOPT_DNS_USE_GLOBAL_CACHE' undeclared (first use in this
> functi
> on)
> I've also tried the --disable-dns switch for configure, wit
Hi there. I just started receiving these messages from freshclam.
freshclam daemon 0.80 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i386)
ClamAV update process started at Mon Oct 25 13:39:46 2004
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
main.cvd is up to date (version: 27, sigs:
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 13:49, Matt wrote:
> Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
>
> Search the archive.
>
Argh, I did... :-S
Can't believe I missed it - sorry.
--
T
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
I've got a mail server here running RH8 (yes, yes I know... :)), and
when trying to build clamav 0.83 RPMs it required zlib 1.2.1.2.
OK, downloaded the FC3 zlib SRPM, built and installed just fine.
However, during configure I get this:
WARNING: ** This ClamAV installation may be linked again
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:49, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Dörfler Andreas said:
> > the versioncheck for zlib isnt the best.
> > suse for example fixes the security hole
> > in 1.2.1 with patches and not with a installation
> > from a new version.
> > forget the warning.
> >
>
> Sounds like suse has i
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:15, Trog wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:07 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
> > I've got a mail server here running RH8 (yes, yes I know... :)), and
> > when trying to build clamav 0.83 RPMs it required zlib 1.2.1.2.
> >
>
> No, it require
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 15:11, Trog wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 14:57 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:49, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> A simple search in the archive for "zlib 1.2.2" turns this up:
>
> http://lurker.clamav.net/message/2
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 17:34, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:57:16 +0100
> Tarjei Knapstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nobody is whining here Dennis.
> >
> > I was asking a question about what the zlib warning was all about. The
>
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
