>thanks. i suspect my invocation needs to be different - when i switch from
>clamscan to clamdscan, messages are processed - for example - rather than
>taking 10 seconds, 20 seconds, etc with clamscan, they claim 'ok' in .1
>seconds, .7 seconds, etc - which doesn't seem possible.
Actually, tha
Hrm. My 0.65 install is picking up Worm.SomeFool.Gen-1, Worm.SomeFool.P,
Worm.SomeFool, and Worm.SomeFool.Gen-2 (7%, 2%, 2% and 2% of viruses going
through that server, respectively) with qmail-scanner.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tomas
http://housecall.trendmicro.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shaun T.
Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Clamav-users] OT: Question Re: possibly infected W2K Server
Is there anything free that I
> > Suggestions, critique, etc are welcomed.
> >
>
> It looks great! About the only thing I'd add is a list of offending IPs
> with # of hits.
>
Drillable stats would be nice, too; maybe import the log into a dbm or
something every night
> > Drillable stats would be nice, too; maybe import the log into a dbm or
> > something every night
>
> That is already available, all the information is stored in MySQL.
>
Hrm. I'll slink back into my hole, now.
---
This SF.Net email i
> I like virii - it sounds important and like something
> that can be on the ER equivalent for geeks...
Perhaps, but if you were to actually pluralize it using Latin rules, the
result would be 'viri.'
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA
> Quoting Shayne Lebrun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> I like virii - it sounds important and like something
> >> that can be on the ER equivalent for geeks...
> >
> > Perhaps, but if you were to actually pluralize it using Latin rules, the
> > res
> Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100?
>
Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the
purchase/access system?
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD
> > > Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100?
> > >
> > Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the
> > purchase/access system?
>
> Welcome to the area of open source...
>
Open source is all well and good, but bandwidth still costs.
-
> > Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the
> > purchase/access system?
> >
>
> And liability insurance.
>
Aye, good point. Especially if you're going to be hoping to sell to
corporate clients.
---
SF.Net email is
> Uhhh... but then what do you think someone providing such service
> would be
> liable for then? Unable to download an update? Or not being
> updated as soon
> as an update arrives?
> Pretty hard one because you connection might be temporarily down, a
> temporarily routing problem might exist some
> I am only trying to understand if it is possible to do with a single
> program (clamav-milter) the job of two programs (clamav-milter
> and noattach).
Ideally, you wouldn't be using clamav-milter; you'd be using a milter that
does content filtering (amavis?), and as part of that content filterin
> It caught the other 24. Is there something special about the TNEF
> file that needs to be configured in clamd.conf or clamsmtpd.conf to
> scan that or is it something else.
Microsoft TNEF is neither a transport, nor neutral, nor encoding, nor a
format. Discuss.
You need to decode TNEFs with so
Checking for a new database - started at Thu Apr 24 14:33:15 2003
Database updated (containing in total 7770 signatures).
(Just installed ClamAV last Thursday)
Note, also, that the simple expedient of adding .vbs and .js to your
'automatically deny' list will stop the vast majority of what passes
Did both report having scanned the same files/number of files?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] clamscan & clamd
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ok, so that brings me
13:54:28 -0400 "Shayne Lebrun" wrote:>
Did both report having scanned the same files/number
of files?> > > -Original Message->
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:42 PM>
> To: [
With my database updated Wedensday, Jun 4th at 1800 hours, this
fortnight.eml doesn't get tripped by clamdscan.
clamdscan fortnight.eml
/home/admin/fortnight.eml: OK
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 0
Time: 0.024 sec (0 m 0 s)
> -Original Message-
> From: Fajar Arief
Just specify them when you compile.
qmail-scanner
./configure --admin virusadmin \
--domain mydomain.net \
--scanners clamscan,verbose_spamassassin \
--debug no \
--install \
--notify recips \
--log-details syslog
Then, modify qmail-scanner-queue.pl or whatever it's called to use clamdscan
instea
>Ok, so you already have apache bound to port 80. How do you bind the
>rsync server to port 80 as well?
As a client, you're not running an rsync server, you're running an rsync
client.
Muskoka.com
115 Manitoba Street
Bracebridge, Ontario
P1L 2B6
(705)645-6097
Muskoka.com is pleased to announce
I think he might mean 'clean up a machine which is wormed/rooted.'
The answer, of course, is 'reformat, reinstall from original media, and
restore known good backups.'
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Antony
Stone
Sent: Monday, November 03, 20
> You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
> to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
"Hi, you got a mail from so and so, but it had a virus, so I deleted it. If
you're act
> > (I still don't understand why the Americans put the month in front of
> > the day -- it makes no logical sense other than to be different
> > from/than everyone else).
> > Have a nice day .. uuuggghhh
It's written as it's spoken, I think. Today's date is 'January 19th, 2006,'
not '19 January
22 matches
Mail list logo
