On 8 May 2014 at 18:48, Steve Basford wrote:
>
>
> > Hey Steve,
> > Could you send me over a copy of your clamd.conf, please?
> Hi Shawn,
>
> I can reproduce...
>
> Installed a clamav without 3rd party stuff, fresh onto a test XP box I
> had not doing anything
>
> run freshclam
> run clamd
>
On 13 Apr 2016 at 11:20, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand why themastersbaker.com would be tagged?
>
> # sigtool --find-sigs winnow.spam.ts.untyped.966134 | sigtool --decode-sigs
> VIRUS NAME: winnow.spam.ts.untyped.966134
Winnow signatures are distributed by Sanesecurity.com. They hav
I'm getting occasional OOM faults apparently originating from clamd on debian.
Is there a simple way to track down why these are happening and preventing them?
Top never shows any problems, and the machine is very lightly loaded.
Message log begins:
> Mar 3 21:18:27 rose kernel: clamd invoked
On 11 Mar 2010 at 14:32, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 11.03.10 11:24, Paul Whelan wrote:
> > I'm getting occasional OOM faults apparently originating from clamd on
> > debian.
>
> OOM means out of memory. Either you are low on real/virtual memory, or you
&g
On 11 Mar 2010 at 11:09, Jim Preston wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Paul Whelan wrote:
>
> >
> > On 11 Mar 2010 at 14:32, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 11.03.10 11:24, Paul Whelan wrote:
> >>> I'm getting occasional OOM f
On 12 Mar 2010 at 8:23, jeff donovan wrote:
> I ran into a similar problem. It turned out to be AutoWhitelist
> growing eating up Hardrive space, eventually the OS had no room for
> virtual memory.
>
> see;
> /var/clamav/.spamassassin/autowhitelist
Thanks for the reply, but no spamassassin
On 19 Apr 2010 at 16:17, Tommaso Basilici wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm probably not fitting in the right place of the thread but I just
> signed in and could not know where to start.
> Our only big problem with this upgrade is that the actual debian stable
> (
On 20 Apr 2010 at 9:50, tim.had...@bl.uk wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is still a Windows compilation which will
> run on Windows Server 2003 SP2? ClamAV (clam-latest-32.exe) refuses to
> install on this operating system and ClamWin seems to have mutated
> into a desktop product which lacks
On 22 Apr 2010 at 12:06, Török Edwin wrote:
> You need to tell amavis to pass the entire message to ClamAV, try:
> $bypass_decode_parts = 1;
>
> I think your amavis tried to decode the message, and pass only parts of
> it to ClamAV.
In general then, clamav may only recognise some malware when
On 5 May 2010 at 9:02, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 2010/05/04 12:56 PM, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > On 2010/05/04 12:00 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> >> I've been getting messages like this:
> >>
> >> main.cld is up to date (version: 52, sigs: 704727, f-level: 44,
> >> builder: sven)
> >> Trying host db.loc
Is this 12 week delay down to a scanning problem?
>From list message received today:
> Received: from tad.clamav.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> by tad.clamav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAD416C1A6;
> Fri, 25 May 2012 14:37:23 +0200 (CEST)
> X-Original-To: clamav-us...@tad.clamav.net
On 25 May 2012 at 14:33, Joel Esler wrote:
> I just went through and cleaned up the mail queues. There were a few stuck.
Thank you Joel, perhaps this needs to be done regularly - another one was stuck
for over 2
years.
paul
___
Help us build a comp
What's the reason for the change in the packaging of the windows binaries?
The differences include:
Creation of a msi install in place of the previously zipped executables and
libraries
Exclusion of the necessary msvc* runtime libraries
Inclusion of the previously separate libclamunrar libs
On 25 Jun 2012 at 8:13, Steve Basford wrote:
> > Your best bet is to ask on the ClamWin forum. Here is the forum site
> > http://forums.clamwin.com/
>
> I'm not sure if he's talking about the binaries here, auto-built by
> ClamAV Team (not the version by the ClamWin team)
>
> http://sourceforge.
On 25 Jun 2012 at 9:55, Tom Judge wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 24/06/2012 18:15, Paul Whelan wrote:
> > What's the reason for the change in the packaging of the windows
> > binaries?
> >
>
> The windows binaries where packaged with custom shell scr
On 18 Sep 2012 at 16:55, Joel Esler wrote:
> All:
>
> if you are a Windows user of ClamAV, you'll be happy to know that we have
> released the Windows builds for ClamAV 0.97.6 to our Sourceforge site here:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/clamav/files/clamav/win32/0.97.6/
>
> Please feel f
On 19 Sep 2012 at 15:19, Shawn Webb wrote:
> Paul,
>
> As of 0.97.5, we do not generate CAB or ZIP files for binary builds. The
> last published ZIP file was for 0.97.4 and is located on Sourcefore. Since
> MSI files can be extracted, we haven't provided CAB/ZIP files.
OK, understood - it just m
On 29 Jan 2013 at 12:26, naresh n wrote:
> Please can any body tell me is it possible to run calmav through command
> prompt in windows OS? If yes how to run?
1. Download & install the windows binaries from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/clamav/files/clamav/win32/
2. Read the documentation and
What PUA category does "PUA.OLE.EmbeddedPDF" come under? (Triggered by a Word
document).
paul
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On 22 Mar 2013 at 11:12, Alain Zidouemba wrote:
> Paul,
>
> That alert is to indicate that the file it alerted on is a likely an
> MS Office document that has a PDF embedded within it. You may want to
> take a closer look to it as we have observed malicious payloads being
> distributed this way i
On 9 Apr 2013 at 11:12, Steve Basford wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Couple of updates..
>
> I've just check end the Sanesecurity.TestSig.GTUBE signature name had
> accidentally been renamed to Sanesecurity.TestSig.10616
>
> I have, however, removed the checks for GTUBE, so at least ClamAV and
> Third-P
On 24 Jul 2013 at 10:07, Joel Esler wrote:
> http://blog.clamav.net/2013/07/a-continued-commitment-to-open-source.h
> tml
>
> Hopefully this will help out :)
Time will tell.
paul
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clam
On 30 Sep 2013 at 11:03, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Thanks
> was looking at the PUA page on the main www site and it's still got
> the 2007 advice of "here be monsters tread carefully" ;-)
I use them but Alain Zidouemba from Sourcefire replied to a question in March
2013 about a
PUA type that did
On 22 Feb 2008 at 7:16, Gerard wrote:
> clamd reports: 249417
> freshclam reports: 169676
That's main only. daily is 48000 now, giving freshclam total about 218000.
With just Sanesesecurity the total is 232000 and not caused me any issues on 4
servers.
The difference with your total m
On 12 Aug 2008 at 7:57, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > . A problem I've seen with greylisting is the round-robin MTA pool.
> > Each is told in turn to come back later and if the pool is large it can
> > take a long time to cycle through all of them.
>
On 17 Mar 2009 at 13:28, Julio Canto wrote:
> Steve Basford escribió:
> >> Any particular reason why they are using 0.94.1 (and it appears with
> >> the most non aggressive settings)? You are not showing off your best
> >> side...
> >
> > Having said that... 0.94.2 is available for windows:
>
On 17 Mar 2009 at 21:22, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> out of the box windows support is planned for ClamAV 0.96; in general
> we don't distribute any binaries but we may consider doing this for
> windows when the support is mature enough
Thanks for the update.
paul
On 18 Mar 2009 at 6:55, Julio Canto wrote:
> Hi again,
> You're wrong assuming that, therefore you should not accuse us of using
> 'strange official channels'. All engines and parameters used - including
> the ones from ClamAV - at VirusTotal are decided and provided with the
> vendors involved.
28 matches
Mail list logo
