looks like -lbz2 is looking in -L/usr/local/lib to resolve
find libbz2.[soa], use nm to validate undefined symbols are defined there, add
that to the compile line and see if everything is good.
i would guess your ./configure step could not find this lib
do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH unset or set
looks like -lbz2 is looking in -L/usr/local/lib to resolve
find libbz2.[soa], use nm to validate undefined symbols are defined there, add
that to the compile line and see if everything is good.
i would guess your ./configure step could not find this lib
do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH unset or set
Folks,
After freshclam downloads and notifies clamd to reload, clamd crashs refusing
restart. I see in the logs as follow. Note this is a custom build ClamAV 0.93
for Trustix.
Thanks,
OSC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/lib/clamav]$ /etc/init.d/clamd start
Starting clamd: LibClamAV Error: cli_tgzload:
in" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ClamAV users ML"
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam (0.93) corrupting daily.cld
> Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 10:18:21 +0300
>
>
> Oscar Usifer wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > After freshclam downloads and notifi
same issue.
Clearly I can escalate my attempts by recompiling a with debugger symbols and
using gdb or stracing to find the particular line of code that is problematic,
but I suspect there is a better option. Any ideas??
Thanks,
OSC
> - Original Message -
> From: "Oscar
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 19:07:38 -0500
> "Oscar Usifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Clearly I can escalate my attempts by recompiling a with debugger symbols
> > and using gdb or stracing to find the particular line of code that is
> > problematic, but
Folks,
On Monday, 12:49 Pacific Time, June 23, 2008 freshclam on my production system
updated the virus signatures and notified clamd. During that time, clam did not
properly reload the previously cited 231780 plus signatures and as a result
began marking all checked files as 'safe', including
hanks
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dennis Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ClamAV users ML"
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Database correctly reloaded (0 signatures)
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:21:45 -0700
>
>
> Oscar Usifer wrote:
&g
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Database correctly reloaded (0 signatures)
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:28:33 +0200
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:09:05 -0500
> "Oscar Usifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Database correctly reloaded (0 signatures)
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:28:33 +0200
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:09:05 -0500
> "Oscar Usifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Database correctly reloaded (0 signatures)
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:28:33 +0200
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:09:05 -0500
> "Oscar Usifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jun 23 14:40:44 2008 -> main.cld is up to date (version: 47, sigs: 312304,
f-level: 31, builder: sven)
Mon Jun 23 14:40:44 2008 -> daily.cld is up to date (version: 7542, sigs:
94559, f-level: 31, builder: sven)
Mon Jun 23 14:40:44 2008 -> --
> - O
;Tomasz Kojm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Database correctly reloaded (0 signatures)
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:21:36 +0200
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:59:13 -0500
> "Oscar Usifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
n: 47, Build time: Mon Jun 23 11:20:53 2008
daily db: Not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tomasz Kojm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Database correctly reloaded (0 signatures)
> Date
Folks,
I am seeing freshclam report more signatures than clamav is reloading in the
logs files. For example freshclam says, 'Database updated (413786
signatures)...' and 'Clamd successfully notified about the update.', but clamd
says, 'Database correctly reloaded (312304 signatures)'. Why does
> - Original Message -
> From: "Noel Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ClamAV users ML"
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam to ClamAV sig parity count mismatch
> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:45:41 -0500
>
>
> Oscar Usifer wrote:
&g
> - Original Message -
> From: "Noel Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ClamAV users ML"
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam to ClamAV sig parity count mismatch
> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:10:33 -0500
>
>
> Oscar Usifer wrote:
my freshclam update daemons are complaining they connet get updates. been like
this about an hour
Thu Sep 4 14:14:29 2008 -> Ignoring mirror 64.246.134.219 (due to previous
errors)
Thu Sep 4 14:14:29 2008 -> Trying host database.clamav.net (168.143.19.95)...
Thu Sep 4 14:14:59 2008 -> nonblo
clamd & freshclam signature counts now *match* after changing
/etc/freshclam.conf setting to "CompressDatabase off" . Thank you! :D
> - Original Message -
> From: "Noel Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ClamAV users ML"
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam to ClamAV sig parity count m
Filed as Bugzilla Bug 1170
> - Original Message -
> From: "Noel Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ClamAV users ML"
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] RESOLVED (was Re: Freshclam to ClamAV sig parity
> count mismatch
> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 20
20 matches
Mail list logo
