It appears that in 0.91.1 and 0.91.2 PhishingScanURLs is on by
default even in non-experimental builds. If the line
H:nationwide.co.uk
is present in daily.pdb (indeed, if it is the _only_ line in
daily.pdb, and that is the only pattern file in use) then the
attached piece of mail hangs 0.9
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Ian G Batten wrote:
> So my money says that the problem is a difference between Sun's
> regexec and whatever platform clamav is developed on (presumably
The problem also arises (ie clamscan or clamd hangs) on Solaris 10 x86
under the same circumstances. So th
On 30 Aug 2007, at 21:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm noticing hang issues again with 0.91.2 on Solaris 10 x86. It
>> doesn't
>> appear to be associated with a particularly malformed message because
>> when it starts hanging, if I restart it
On 3 Sep 2007, at 17:02, Henrik Krohns wrote:
>>
>> Same problem I saw. The regexp built by the PhishingScanURLs option
>> appears to upset the Solaris regexp library, but not the Linux or OSX
>> versions. I've got a more serious look at the problem on my list of
>> jobs to do, but for now I ju
On 20 Sep 07, at 2203, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -- Trog said the following on 9/19/07 2:55 PM:
>> Forth alternative: use current SVN code, which has it's own regex
>> code to
>> overcome platform issues.
>
> Compiled smoothly for me on Solaris 10 x86. It's now running on test
> box. Thanks fo
On 18 Nov 07, at 0614, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> Have you considered scannning only files that have changed (md5sum
> difference, for
> example) since the last time they were scanned? There's no need to
> scan a file
> endlessly - only if it has changed since the previous scan.
Hmm. Firstly
On 19 Nov 07, at 1228, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 Ian G Batten wrote:
>
>> On 18 Nov 07, at 0614, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you considered scannning only files that have changed (md5sum
>>> difference, for e
On 19 Nov 07, at 1524, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> Can we have a reality check, please. When is the last time you
> found a virus in /sbin
> after a new pattern file has been made available?
True enough. But if we're on reality checks, doing it twice on the
grounds that the first time /sbin'
