re on my system.
Has anyone got a 'How to' or some other notes on getting this to work on
Debain Woody?
Many thanks
Gareth
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integ
Hi Guys
What is the best way to upgrade from ClamAV 0.65 to 0.66, should I just
install on top of the current installation, or remove first?
What is good practice?
Gareth
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build
Sorry... I need spoon feeding...
...just remove the files? I didn't do an RPM or Deb package install... and
I've not stumbled across a 'Add/Remove Programs' in the Control Panel yet
;-)
Gareth
Matthew wrote:
> Best bet to remove .65 first
>
> Caused me no end
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni <
giampa...@tomassoni.biz> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just for interest.. feedback on EOL...
> >
> > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=clamav
>
> Indeed, an EOL on the previous minor version is quite an hazard and may be
> regarded as a self-destru
Good Morning
I am running clamav with qmail on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 and i
have recently upgraded to clamav-0.90.2. Clamd's cpu usage shotup to an
average between 400% and 500%(8 cpu's), even though the amount of virusses
did'nt increase that much.
Any ideas?
__
The solution worked thank you very much. We also found that there are two
copies of the virus database being loaded
Gareth
On Monday, 7 May 2007, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> Hello, Gareth.
>
> You wrote on Monday, May 7, 2007, 11:26:16 AM:
> > I am running clamav with qmail on Red
2007-12-10 10:59:01.222556500 ERROR: pthread_create failed
2007-12-10 10:59:05.708102500 /var/spool/eric/mail6203:
Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain FOUND
Gareth
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http
Hope this helps...
[ophelia:~]# cat /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory
0
On Monday 10 December 2007 12:21:13 pm Trog wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 11:29 +0200, Gareth Koopman wrote:
> > Good Morning
> >
> > I am currently running clamav 0.91.2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS
>
Today we seen it happen thrice randomly within three hours and once 3 weeks
ago
On Monday 10 December 2007 01:26:22 pm Trog wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 13:06 +0200, Gareth Koopman wrote:
> > Hope this helps...
> >
> > [ophelia:~]# cat /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory
>
I am running Suse Openexchange 4.1. I have installed
amavisd-postfix-20020531-31 and by default it is configured to use
'H+BEDV AntiVir' for virus checking.
I have installed clamav-0.73 from source and compiled and installed it
and it is working. I have started clamd and edited /etc/amavisd.conf a
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:54, Graham Dodd wrote:
> Hello Gareth,
>
> Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 1:52:57 PM, you wrote:
>
> GB> I am running Suse Openexchange 4.1. I have installed
> GB> amavisd-postfix-20020531-31 and by default it is configured to use
> GB> '
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:47, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> Gareth Blades wrote the following on 06/29/2004 01:52 PM :
>
> >I am running Suse Openexchange 4.1. I have installed
> >amavisd-postfix-20020531-31 and by default it is configured to use
> >'H+BEDV AntiVir'
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 14:32, Gareth Blades wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:47, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> > Gareth Blades wrote the following on 06/29/2004 01:52 PM :
> >
> > >I am running Suse Openexchange 4.1. I have installed
> > >amavisd-postfix-20020531-31 a
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 12:35, Meni Shapiro wrote:
>
>
> Philip Ershler wrote:
> > I am running the .80 release. Tonight I ran the current set of tests
> > from www.testvirus.org.
> > Tests 4,5,7,8,17, and 19 got through. Any idea what's going on. The last
>
> I'm running v 0.80 and made the te
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 13:00, Gareth Blades wrote:
> I am running Suse Openexchange -> Amavis (clamd) -> Postfix.
>
> Mine lets through 24, 25, 27.
> Number 8 was blocked by file type but not detected by a virus.
> For 24 & 25 as they are not a virus I need to look at the
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
> > You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
> > to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
>
> Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
>
> "Hi, you got a mail from
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 20:28, IT Purchases wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm constructing a SPAM / AV mechanism to reduce the incoming debris.
>
> I'm using Postfix with amavisd-new, Clam-AV and SpamAssassin.
>
> What is the easiest way to setup a whitelist for Clam-AV?
Why would you ever want to whitelis
his expected behaviour for clamscan?
- Is there another, lower, limit on file sizes which can actually be scanned in
practice?
- Is there a way to force clamscan to error if a file has not actually been
scanned?
Regards,
Gareth
___
clamav-us
18 matches
Mail list logo
