[Clamav-users] Question on change in freshclam return codes

2010-03-31 Thread Clayton Keller
I have recently upgraded an install from 0.95.3 to 0.96 and have noticed a change in the return codes of freshclam. Taken from the man page of each. 0.95.3: 0 : Database successfully updated. 1 : Database is up-to-date. 0.96: 0 : Database is up-to-date or successfully updated. I didn't see an

Re: [Clamav-users] Question on change in freshclam return codes

2010-04-02 Thread Clayton Keller
On 4/2/2010 7:19 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:00:03 -0500 Clayton Keller wrote: I didn't see anything in the ChangeLog pertaining to this change. I wanted to see if I could gather additional info as to why. The reason for the question is I had some code which would lo

[Clamav-users] Compiler Version Configure Error

2010-04-07 Thread Clayton Keller
I am testing out the ./configure and make on an older RedHat 7.3 Server. I am seeing the following in the ./configure output: ... checking for supported C++ compiler version... configure: error: C++ compiler too old (2.96) ... While I know this is a much out dated OS, and with that an old com

Re: [Clamav-users] Compiler Version Configure Error

2010-04-07 Thread Clayton Keller
On 4/7/2010 11:12 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 07:08 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: I am testing out the ./configure and make on an older RedHat 7.3 Server. I am seeing the following in the ./configure output: ... checking for supported C++ compiler version... configure: error: C

Re: [Clamav-users] Compiler Version Configure Error

2010-04-07 Thread Clayton Keller
On 4/7/2010 11:26 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 07:24 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 4/7/2010 11:12 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 07:08 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: I am testing out the ./configure and make on an older RedHat 7.3 Server. I am seeing the following in the ./configure

Re: [Clamav-users] Compiler Version Configure Error

2010-04-07 Thread Clayton Keller
On 4/7/2010 12:30 PM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 08:17 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 4/7/2010 11:26 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 07:24 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 4/7/2010 11:12 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 07:08 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: I am testing out the

Re: [Clamav-users] Compiler Version Configure Error

2010-04-07 Thread Clayton Keller
On 4/7/2010 2:33 PM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 09:34 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 4/7/2010 12:30 PM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 08:17 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 4/7/2010 11:26 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 07:24 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 4/7/2010 11:12 AM, Török

Re: [Clamav-users] Compiler Version Configure Error

2010-04-07 Thread Clayton Keller
On 4/7/2010 2:35 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 4/7/2010 2:33 PM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 09:34 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 4/7/2010 12:30 PM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 08:17 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 4/7/2010 11:26 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 07:24 PM, Clayton

Re: [Clamav-users] Compiler Version Configure Error

2010-04-08 Thread Clayton Keller
On 4/7/2010 3:55 PM, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/07/2010 11:26 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: What could possibly occur if I installed with the current zlib version as-is? Some bytecodes will fail to extract compressed data, such as javascripts in PDFs. Best regards, --Edwin Well, I've upgrad

[Clamav-users] STATS command timeout

2010-05-11 Thread Clayton Keller
I am trying to execute the STATS command with clamd. I have created the socket and am trying to send 'zSTATS' to the daemon, and am returned a "COMMAND READ TIMEOUT". I am able to issue other commands without issue (i.e. 'VERSION', 'PING', 'SCAN'). After reading through the documentation I

Re: [Clamav-users] STATS command timeout

2010-05-11 Thread Clayton Keller
On 5/11/2010 1:52 PM, Török Edwin wrote: On 05/11/2010 09:51 PM, Clayton Keller wrote: I am trying to execute the STATS command with clamd. I have created the socket and am trying to send 'zSTATS' to the daemon, and am returned a "COMMAND READ TIMEOUT". Did you termin

Re: [Clamav-users] RLIMIT_DATA

2010-09-21 Thread Clayton Keller
On 9/21/2010 3:39 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:29:01 +0200 Cristina Tanzi Tolenti wrote: Hi! today I update clamav to 0.96.3 from source and when I restart the service I have this warning: Running on 32-bit system, and RLIMIT_DATA> 2GB, lowering to 2GB! That warning was add

Re: [Clamav-users] RLIMIT_DATA

2010-09-21 Thread Clayton Keller
On 9/21/2010 11:22 AM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 9/21/2010 3:39 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:29:01 +0200 Cristina Tanzi Tolenti wrote: Hi! today I update clamav to 0.96.3 from source and when I restart the service I have this warning: Running on 32-bit system, and RLIMIT_DATA

Re: [Clamav-users] RLIMIT_DATA

2010-09-21 Thread Clayton Keller
On 9/21/2010 1:37 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi-- On Sep 21, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Török Edwin wrote: [ ... ] If it shows ~120M your OS is buggy. Then run again with ulimit -d 2097151, and see if it reports any higher value. Interesting; even on FreeBSD I get: % ./a.out failed after 15529 mmap() c

Re: [Clamav-users] Upcoming release of ClamAV

2010-10-19 Thread Clayton Keller
On 10/19/2010 9:24 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote: You can help by testing (or just running ./configure&& make check) the latest code available in our Git repository - the latest snapshot tarball can be grabbed here: We were able to configure and make check without issue in our environment. CentOS r

[Clamav-users] SCAN Command Results

2010-12-01 Thread Clayton Keller
Since upgrading to 0.96.5 I've seen different results with the SCAN command.. In my initial testing I did not see this behavior, however it has been occurring off and on this morning. Not in every instance of the results returned by the SCAN command, but some will include the md5sum and size

Re: [Clamav-users] SCAN Command Results

2010-12-01 Thread Clayton Keller
On 12/1/2010 11:16 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:46:41 -0600 Clayton Keller wrote: Since upgrading to 0.96.5 I've seen different results with the SCAN command.. See the discussion on clamav-devel, there are 2 bugs: the hash reply that shouldn't be there (only if y

Re: [Clamav-users] SCAN Command Results

2010-12-01 Thread Clayton Keller
On 12/1/2010 11:18 AM, Clayton Keller wrote: On 12/1/2010 11:16 AM, Török Edwin wrote: On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:46:41 -0600 Clayton Keller wrote: Since upgrading to 0.96.5 I've seen different results with the SCAN command.. See the discussion on clamav-devel, there are 2 bugs: the hash

Re: [clamav-users] WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!

2012-06-15 Thread Clayton Keller
On 06/15/2012 08:23 AM, Matt Olney wrote: Bill, Can you submit a sample or two here: http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi So we can look at it? Thanks, Matt On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Bill Maidment wrote: I've updated to clamav-0.97.5 and now I'm

[clamav-users] Database Mirror Issues

2013-02-14 Thread Clayton Keller
Within the past hour we have started seeing the following errors reported when running freshclam: ERROR: getpatch: Can't download daily-16682.cdiff from db.us.clamav.net ERROR: Can't download daily.cvd from db.us.clamav.net ERROR: getpatch: Can't download daily-16682.cdiff from database.clamav.n

Re: [clamav-users] Database Mirror Issues

2013-02-14 Thread Clayton Keller
On 02/14/2013 10:31 AM, Shawn Webb wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Clayton Keller wrote: Within the past hour we have started seeing the following errors reported when running freshclam: ERROR: getpatch: Can't download daily-16682.cdiff from db.us.clamav.net ERROR: Can'

Re: [Clamav-users] bzip2 1.0.5 for CentOS

2008-09-17 Thread Clayton Keller
Roberto Ullfig wrote: > Paul Bijnens wrote: >> On 2008-09-05 17:11, SM wrote: >> >>> At 01:11 05-09-2008, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >>> But even a manual "yum update" finds nothing to update. I cannot imagine Redhat/CentOS neglecting to provide a patch for that >>> Why not

Re: [Clamav-users] bzip2 1.0.5 for CentOS

2008-09-17 Thread Clayton Keller
Jason Bertoch wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clayton Keller >> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:34 AM >> To: ClamAV users ML >> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] bzip2 1.

[Clamav-users] ClamAV JPEG Exploit - False Positives

2004-11-17 Thread Clayton Keller
I have been doing some digging and have noticed from posts and changelogs issues pertaining to false positives of this exploit may have been taken care of during the RC phase of 0.80. I have had some messages brought to my attention that have been rejected due to the exploit that do not appear

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV JPEG Exploit - False Positives

2004-11-17 Thread Clayton Keller
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:12:26 -0600 Clayton Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have been doing some digging and have noticed from posts and changelogs issues pertaining to false positives of this exploit may have been taken care of during the RC phase of 0.80. The problem has been fi

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV JPEG Exploit - False Positives

2004-11-19 Thread Clayton Keller
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 20:20, Rich Graves wrote: On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Clayton Keller wrote: It appears the issue is currently with Macintosh users trying to send .jpegs. Any known issues with the manner in which Photoshop maybe creating images. There does not appear to be any type of patch

[Clamav-users] Excel Exploit

2006-06-23 Thread Clayton Keller
), MemScan:Trojan.Jmokimo.A (Bitdefender) Are these added due in part to these types of attachments that are discussed in the exploits? Clayton Keller ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html