[Clamav-users] Older database version wanted

2004-02-09 Thread Bruce Richardson
I have an interesting situation where my Debian/Sarge workstation is happily running clamav and freshclam (version 0.60.x) but the Debian/Woody boxes onto which I have just installed clamav (version 0.65-1, backported) complain of an MD5 error and refuse to do anything. Now, I understand this is d

Re: [Clamav-users] Older database version wanted

2004-02-09 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:59:42PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Now, I understand this is due to a problem with the latest version of > the database files, not with the Debian clamav backport. But it leaves > me stuck, since I have no older version of the files. Is there somwher

Re: [Clamav-users] Older database version wanted

2004-02-09 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:48:07PM +0100, Thomas Lamy wrote: > Where did you get that backport from? www.backports.org I'll wait for the "official" backport to catch up with the bugfix. -- Bruce --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCo

[Clamav-users] Stats on MyDoom bounces

2004-02-13 Thread Bruce Richardson
I've been analysing the MyDoom bounces that slip though ClamAV on my set-up (Exim 4.3, exiscan patch, clamav 0.65-2). I noticed that 56% of the bounces were generated by Exim and 44% generated by Qmail. No other mtas showed up in the statistics at all. -- Bruce ---

Re: [Clamav-users] email structure logging

2004-03-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:05:42PM -0500, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Howdy list, > > Is there any way to make clamd log the structure of > a message and it's attachments? BinHex, MIME, plain-text, > ZIP, RAR, BZIP, GZIP, OLE2, etc...? > > This information would be great for statistics, but I > coul