[Clamav-users] 0.95.3 clamav-milter

2009-11-21 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Greetings all, I've finally upgraded to 0.95.3 from 0.94 and I have a question regarding the new clamav-milter due to the lack of information regarding it. Is the old milter string for sendmail still to be used? INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R

[Clamav-users] clamav 90.1 isn't detecting attachments

2007-03-31 Thread Bit Fuzzy
I'm hoping somebody can shed some light on what we're seeing. We've been using ClamAV since version: 85.1 and have had nothing but good things to say about it. That is until we updated to version 90.1 Since the update any and all messages containing infected attachments including the provided

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 90.1 isn't detecting attachments

2007-03-31 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Matthias Häker wrote: Bit Fuzzy schrieb: I'm hoping somebody can shed some light on what we're seeing. We've been using ClamAV since version: 85.1 and have had nothing but good things to say about it. That is until we updated to version 90.1 Since the update any a

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 90.1 isn't detecting attachments -- partially fixed

2007-03-31 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Matthias Häker wrote: Bit Fuzzy schrieb: I'm hoping somebody can shed some light on what we're seeing. We've been using ClamAV since version: 85.1 and have had nothing but good things to say about it. That is until we updated to version 90.1 Since the update any a

Re: [Clamav-users] Memory usage for clamd is huge

2008-03-30 Thread Bit Fuzzy
>>> It's not unthinkable, there actually are places where microsoft software >>> is not used. >>> >> Doesn't matter - there's no reason to suspect that all viruses originate >> from Windows. Could I have your outgoing smtp IP please? >> > > Wow - as a long term IT professional I thou

Re: [Clamav-users] Memory usage for clamd is huge

2008-03-31 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Dennis Peterson wrote: > And to follow up on the earlier > point about Windows systems not being the sole source of spam/virus > distribution, > > Two minutes to hack a Mac and it's now available to generate spam and > become a drone to spread malware for other Macs or Windows systems. > >

Re: [Clamav-users] Memory usage for clamd is huge

2008-03-31 Thread Bit Fuzzy
It may be just me, but I think this topic has been beaten to death :-\ ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] WARNING: Suspicious recipient address blocked

2008-04-14 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Alan Stern wrote: > There's certainly something wrong here. The open and close bracket > characters ('[' and ']', items 19 and 21) can indeed be part of a valid > email address. For example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > There's a difference between "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" which would be invalid and [E

[Clamav-users] Trashscan Question

2004-03-07 Thread Bit Fuzzy
I have a question regarding Trashscan, and I'm hoping someone has tried this.   Is it possible for trashscan to provide the name of the virus found in the notification email?     I've tried contacting [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding this issue, but the address is invalid.    

Re: [Clamav-users] Trashscan Question

2004-03-07 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Never mind,   I got it - Original Message - From: Bit Fuzzy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 10:56 PM Subject: [Clamav-users] Trashscan Question I have a question regarding Trashscan, and I'm hoping someone has tried

Re: [Clamav-users] Great surprise!!! CLAMAV is showing virus into Notepad.exe on Windows 98 CD provided by Microsoft.

2004-03-15 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Which versions are you seeing this under? I've tested notepad.exe from 98, ME, and XP Pro and show no virus result for it. It is possible that the files are indeed infected. My suggestion before writing it off as an error on ClamAV's part, is to take the win machine in question and perform a web

[Clamav-users] Updating ClamAv

2004-03-17 Thread Bit Fuzzy
First I'd like so say "GREAT PROGRAM!!!" I notice in my logs that main.cvd isn't (or hasn't) been updating is this normal? Also, I'm currently using ClamAV 0.67 should I upgrade to 0.70 etc as they become available? or will the updated functionality be included in my update process? Thanks in ad

Re: [Clamav-users] Postmaster bounces and such.

2004-03-21 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Dropping isn't good or bad, however if you're not careful it could come around and bite you on the back side. I notify the 'recipient' in the event the email in question was expected (part of a project, family / business correspondence etc). Otherwise they could be wondering where their email is,

Re: [Clamav-users] Postmaster bounces and such.

2004-03-21 Thread Bit Fuzzy
This is true - Original Message - From: "jef moskot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Postmaster bounces and such. > On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Bit Fuzzy wrote: > > I notify the '

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus Names

2004-04-06 Thread Bit Fuzzy
While I can and do understand what Eric was saying, I have to agree with Erick. http://www.bitdefender.com/index.php - Bitdefender http://www.grisoft.com/us/us_index.php - AVG http://www.pandasoftware.com/home/ - Panda http://www.symantec.com/ - Norton http://us.mcafee.com/default.asp - Mcafee htt

[Clamav-users] WORM_SWEN.A undetected

2004-04-20 Thread Bit Fuzzy
It appears ClamAV doesn't detect WORM_SWEN.A I'll try to track down a signature for it, but since my PC Scanner removed it, it may be a while --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Ro

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: WORM_SWEN.A undetected

2004-04-21 Thread Bit Fuzzy
A undetected > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 12:00:54 -0400, Bit Fuzzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It appears ClamAV doesn't detect WORM_SWEN.A > > > > Yes it does. ClamAV actually detects 9 variants of Gibe virus. > And for me Soemfool is usually blocked by ext

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: WORM_SWEN.A undetected

2004-04-21 Thread Bit Fuzzy
- Original Message - From: "Virgo Pärna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 11:00 AM Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: WORM_SWEN.A undetected > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:54:35 -0400, Bit Fuzzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Virus Alias Database

2004-05-11 Thread Bit Fuzzy
- Original Message - From: "Kevin Spicer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:01 AM Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Virus Alias Database > On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 00:58, Mitch (WebCob) wrote: > > I'm sure there are many (including myself) that could b

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with False Positives for Oversized Zip.

2004-05-11 Thread Bit Fuzzy
- Original Message - From: "Dave Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 12:30 PM Subject: [Clamav-users] Problems with False Positives for Oversized Zip. > Hi All, > > We have seen instances where we are sending out zip files which are > pick

Re: [Clamav-users] Ethics Question

2004-06-10 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Damian Menscher wrote: On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Tris Forster wrote: With a ridiculous number of Somefools arriving at our server daily I was trying to think of a proactive way do deal with them. One possible solution I came up with was sending winpopups to the offending IP informing them that they ar

Re: [Clamav-users] [clamav-users]stats about clamav

2004-07-20 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Nigel Horne wrote: > I want to generate statistics about clamav : how many > requests or mails infected ? As at http://cgi.bandsman.co.uk/cgi-bin/virus/display.pl? You'll see a link there to the script that generated the stats. -Nigel The download link seems to have been removed --

Re: [Clamav-users] [clamav-users]stats about clamav

2004-07-20 Thread Bit Fuzzy
Nigel Horne wrote: On Tuesday 20 Jul 2004 17:23, Bit Fuzzy wrote: The download link seems to have been removed What download link? There never has been a download link, so I don't know why you say it's been removed. If you're after the software use the

Re: [Clamav-users] New virus/worm ???

2004-08-09 Thread Bit Fuzzy
- Original Message - From: "Michael Brennen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 1:58 PM Subject: [Clamav-users] New virus/worm ??? > > Just in the last few minutes I've started getting hit with several > copies of a a zip packaged exe file from wi

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV should not try to detectphishingandothersocial engineering attacks

2004-11-15 Thread Bit Fuzzy
I can't believe this one subject can create such a mess. > ClamAv is marketed as an antivirus tool. I think, as you say, there is a need for a generic anti-malware tool. But don't call it clamav. Not detecting phishing attempts, would be like allowing Trojans through as acceptable attachments.

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav as HTTP scanner?

2004-12-16 Thread Bit Fuzzy
> Linux vendors make from their product is in the sale of packaged > products or the sale of updates. Hmm, good point I didn't think of that ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] M$ preparing AV software ?

2005-02-09 Thread Bit Fuzzy
- Original Message - From: "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ClamAV users ML" Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 4:13 PM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] M$ preparing AV software ? > I'm actually viewing it more as a tactic of MS buying and then closing up > shops that sell Linux pro

Re: [Clamav-users] Maybe a virus Sober.P

2005-05-05 Thread Bit Fuzzy
> > "Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he > would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I > am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of > you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have > c

Re: [Clamav-users] Squirriel Mail clamav scanner

2006-01-09 Thread Bit Fuzzy
> i was wondering if anyone knows of a squirriel mail plugin using ClamAV > to scan e-mails? IMHO that would be over kill. Incomming messages will be scaned via ClamAV as should messages being sent. (depending on configuration) Squirrelmail does not change how mail is sent or received. It only p

Re: [Clamav-users] Squirriel Mail clamav scanner

2006-01-09 Thread Bit Fuzzy
> There are modules to do imap from other servers, as well as pop...at > the user, not server level. I can very easily see a use for clam > scanning at the squirrelmail user level, just as you have the ability > to do spamassassin scanning at the user level. This is true. _

Re: [ [Clamav-users] custom signatures not working]

2006-02-28 Thread Bit Fuzzy
- Original Message - From: "Steve Basford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ClamAV users ML" Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:07 PM Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Clamav-users] custom signatures not working] > Some example sigs... Note the case of the text > > Sig eg 1: > > Html.Phishing.Pay.Gen017.

Re: [Clamav-users] bash script to split mbox file and scan individual messages

2006-08-27 Thread Bit Fuzzy
the circumstances arose where mail folders are kept from a pre-clamav time, or there was an issue with the clamav setup at the time, or clamav was not scanning incoming mail but was scanning files, etc. can happen. happened to me. from looking at the mailing list and the faq, it does happen.

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: To ClamAV Developers: donation question

2006-11-08 Thread Bit Fuzzy
In other words, you are looking for a tax write off. If so, is that a crime? Or for that matter wrong? I think not The truth of the matter is in a business setting (especially in a Corporate setting) you "need" to be able to show where funds are going. If we don't get a receipt (or a

Re: [Clamav-users] Cherishing my ignorance - An appeal to package rs

2006-11-09 Thread Bit Fuzzy
My god! This topic hasn't been killed yet?!? ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html