[clamav-users] What is the actual danger of this?

A clamdscan flagged quite a few files on my system as Heueristics.Broken.Media.JPEG.JFIFmarkerBadPosition. What kind of exploit is that? And what kind of danger does it pose? (What does it do?) Is it for all systems? Or just for Windows? A whole lot of web searching turned up nothing. Does anyo

Re: [clamav-users] What is the actual danger of this?

for me look it like that the jpeg files cannot be read from heuristics scan as reason that something is wrong with it i would not think frist, that is be an exploit Von / From: Clamav User Mailinglist An / To: Newcomer01 CC /

Re: [clamav-users] Future support of clamav in EPEL7 and EPEL8

Hi Scott, Michael, Orion, You make some good points. In particular as Linux/Unix distributions are still learning how to package Rust software. We're starting the discussion within Cisco to consider this ask. We do not expect to extend ClamAV's LTS policy, but we will discuss the specific case

Re: [clamav-users] What is the actual danger of this?

This alert means that the JPEG is slightly malformed. Many applications will probably be fine with it. ClamAV thinks it is a little odd. The risk is probably pretty low, but perhaps looking at a little to see if any other antivirus products think it is suspicious. Regards, Micah Micah Snyd

Re: [clamav-users] Future support of clamav in EPEL7 and EPEL8

On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 01:27 +, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav- users wrote: > Hi Scott, Michael, Orion, > > You make some good points. In particular as Linux/Unix distributions > are still learning how to package Rust software. > It's not a matter of knowing how to package rust. It's jus