Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV MD5 sum based whitelists (*.fp) don’t work in Ubuntu MATE 20.04.2

2021-04-20 Thread Pavel Řezníček
Humm, I’ve restarted my laptop and now the .fp file gets read and the detection gets ignored. How come I need to restart the machine? Is there any service I could restart instead? Pavel Dne 17. 04. 21 v 20:55 Richard Graham via clamav-users napsal(a): Very curious!  It seems to work as expec

[clamav-users] False positive on Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SSL-Spoof, no attachment

2021-04-20 Thread Robert Kudyba
An important email from our university president was quarantined with Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SSL-Spoof. I submitted the email as an attachment to ClamAV. I'm also disabling it based on past reports such as https://qmailtoaster-list.qmailtoaster.narkive.com/NYaYAjLl/disabling-clamav-heuristic-phi

[clamav-users] Fwd: [OT] Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain...

2021-04-20 Thread Robert Kudyba
> Is there an updated convention for this? I believe it's more or less unchanged since version 8.6 of Sendmail > (from the early 1990's). The ID is generated in assign_queueid() in > .../sendmail/queue.c, which uses the integer as an index to the string > "0123456789ABCDEF... you get the picture

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV MD5 sum based whitelists (*.fp) don’t work in Ubuntu MATE 20.04.2

2021-04-20 Thread Richard Graham via clamav-users
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:54 AM Pavel Řezníček wrote: > Humm, I’ve restarted my laptop and now the .fp file gets read and the > detection gets ignored. > > How come I need to restart the machine? Is there any service I could > restart instead? > A restart shouldn't be necessary. Is that behavio

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV MD5 sum based whitelists (*.fp) don’t work in Ubuntu MATE 20.04.2

2021-04-20 Thread Pavel Řezníček
I can't reproduce the issue any more. ☹ Tried to create a new .fp file with another signature and both the files, the old and the new, get parsed properly now. This is a bit spooky. Nevertheless, thank you for your assistance, Richard! Should I discover the same behavior again, I'll report as

Re: [clamav-users] False positive on Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SSL-Spoof, no attachment

2021-04-20 Thread Al Varnell via clamav-users
As you have noted, this is a common situation. Anytime the actual URL does not closely match the displayed URL you'll get an alert unless it has been added to an M or X signature in the database. I haven't been convinced that anybody is maintaining that list of exceptions, so disabling it is pro