[clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread Sohin Vyacheslav via clamav-users
Hello, Recently I found in freshclam.log messages like this: Can't query daily.25671.105.1.0.6810DA54.ping.clamav.net that was occured once per day about 11:30 p.m. Another attempts to update clamav are successfull (before mentioned message and after) but next day this message is repeat. I t

Re: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, Sohin Vyacheslav via clamav-users wrote: Recently I found in freshclam.log messages like this: Can't query daily.25671.105.1.0.6810DA54.ping.clamav.net [...] I thought that the reason is connection error with IPv6 mirrors [...] $ freshclam --list-mirrors Mirror #1

Re: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread Robert M. Stockmann via clamav-users
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, Sohin Vyacheslav via clamav-users wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 11:18:15 +0200 > From: Sohin Vyacheslav via clamav-users > To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > Cc: Sohin Vyacheslav > Subject: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log > > Hello, > > Recently I found in fres

Re: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread Sohin Vyacheslav via clamav-users
23.12.2019 15:37, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users пишет: Are you sure that you have IPv6 connectivity to the mirrors? $ ping db.nl.ipv6.clamav.net PING db.nl.ipv6.clamav.net.cdn.cloudflare.net (104.16.219.84) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 104.16.219.84 (104.16.219.84): icmp_seq=1 ttl=

Re: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread Sohin Vyacheslav via clamav-users
23.12.2019 15:43, Robert M. Stockmann via clamav-users пишет: On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, Sohin Vyacheslav via clamav-users wrote: [hubble:root]:(~)# freshclam --list-mirrors WARNING: Deprecated option --list-mirrors. Individual mirrors are no longer tracked, as official signature distribution is no

Re: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users
These don’t exist. All of these addresses simply point at database.clamav.net. So, it makes no sense to point them to anything else. Sent from my  iPad > On Dec 23, 2019, at 04:19, Sohin Vyacheslav via clamav-users > wrote: > > DatabaseMirror db.nl.ipv6.clamav.net > DatabaseMirror db.fr.ip

Re: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread Sohin Vyacheslav via clamav-users
23.12.2019 16:51, Joel Esler (jesler) пишет: These don’t exist. All of these addresses simply point at database.clamav.net. So, it makes no sense to point them to anything else. Ok, I agree. But what about mentioned message: Can't query daily.25671.105.1.0.6810DA54.ping.clamav.net -- Be

Re: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread Eric Tykwinski
This was mentioned here before, and I can't remember what the status was. For this example: A dig trace leads to: ping.clamav.net.86400 IN NS ns1a.clamav.net. ;; BAD (HORIZONTAL) REFERRAL dig: too many lookups #dig daily.25671.105.1.0.6810DA54.ping.clamav.net @ns1a.clamav.net

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter and "whitelist"

2019-12-23 Thread Gerard E. Seibert via clamav-users
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 08:04:13 +0100, Alessandro Vesely via clamav-users stated: >Perhaps you could try and match From:snopescom-.*@cmail20.com? Actually, it is the "@cmail20.com" part changes also. -- Jerry ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-user

Re: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users
I think the status is currently “ignore this”. Sent from my  iPad > On Dec 23, 2019, at 10:52, Eric Tykwinski wrote: > > This was mentioned here before, and I can't remember what the status was. > > For this example: > A dig trace leads to: > ping.clamav.net.86400 IN NS n

Re: [clamav-users] messages in freshclam.log

2019-12-23 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users
This is correct. Please ignore the "Can't query daily. ... .ping.clamav.net". This message has been removed as of ClamAV 0.102. -Micah On 12/23/19, 12:12 PM, "clamav-users on behalf of Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users" wrote: I think the status is currently “ignore this”.