Using clamav...
Is there any way to find out what is the risk level (score/priority/...) of
the detected virus/malware?
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a
Hello,
Using clamav...
Is there any way to find out what is the risk level (score/priority/...)
of the detected virus/malware?
From my own opinion :
PUA detected malwares are risk : LOW
All other detected malwares are risk : MAXIMUM (if not a false positive).
--
Cordialement / Best regards
Not unless you are lucky enough to be able to somehow identify what the malware
is. About the only ones that you stand any chance of finding would be those
identified with a "CVE" number that you can look up on Mitre or NIST sites. A
small number will get written up on the Talos blog site
Hi there,
On Thu, 30 May 2019, WagdeZ wrote
Using clamav...
Is there any way to find out what is the risk level (score/priority/...) of
the detected virus/malware?
The question is rather vague.
In many cases the signature name gives some sort of clue to what the
signature is about, so if you
Not sure if this is the right forum to ask this but appreciate any insight that
can be provided.
We are running clamd on a web server with IIS (Windows server)configured
with srvany to run clamd as a service which the application calls during
uploads to check files on their way in. I've up
Does your platform have GNU time or strace? Try running clamscan with
'/usr/bin/time -v' and/or 'strace -c' and compare the output with that of
your Ubuntu host.
I wonder if loading the signature DB is causing excessive page faults on
the system without as much memory (time -v will tell you how m
Hi,
I'm trying to scan files for PUAs.
When you do that, you get a lot of packers show up.
But when I type
--detect-pua=yes --exclude-pua=Win.Packer
it doesn't detect any PUAs at all (including PUA.Win.Malware etc).
Am I typing something wrong or is this a bug?
Running ClamAV v0.101.2 on Gent
Also, what is the difference between e.g. Win.Trojan and PUA.Win.Trojan? Why
would a trojan be a PUA?
--
-Dan Q
On Thu, 30 May 2019 17:02:08 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Quintiliani via clamav-users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to scan files for PUAs.
> When you do that, you get a lot of packers show
It isn’t strictly used for debugging, though that version with the “D” at the
end is the debug version of the visual C runtime. What version of ClamAV are
you running? I don’t know if older versions were debug builds, but our latest
versions should all be release builds. The newer versions of
I think the PUA version are just potentially unwanted things that exhibit
trojan-like behavior but aren't confirmed trojans.
As for the original question, it looks like it's only using the first part
of that to determine the group of PUAs to ignore.
These are the 'PUA' families (and associated si
Hi,
I’m just trying out clamav for the first time. I executed these steps:
docker run -it ubuntu /bin/bash
apt update
apt-get -y install clamdscan
freshclam
All these seemed to work successfully. But I’m not finding all the clamav
components. For example, in /etc/clamav I only find these:
For clamd and clamd.conf, you’ll need to:
apt-get -y install clamav-daemon
As you’ve noticed, Ubuntu decided to split up the project into multiple
components. You may also want to install libclamunrar for RAR file parsing
support
apt-get -y install libclamunrar7
Regards,
Micah
From: clamav-
12 matches
Mail list logo