Am 29.10.18 um 17:33 schrieb Kris Deugau:
> Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> Am 26.10.18 um 15:34 schrieb Johnny Time:
>>> For exemple, we wanted to authorize only a white list which contains
>>> *.doc,*.xls,*.pdf and ban the others extensions.
>>
>> Surely you meant to write "*.docx,*.xlsx,*.pdf"?
>> *.do
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 29.10.18 um 17:33 schrieb Kris Deugau:
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 26.10.18 um 15:34 schrieb Johnny Time:
For exemple, we wanted to authorize only a white list which contains
*.doc,*.xls,*.pdf and ban the others extensions.
Surely you meant to write "*.docx,*.xlsx,*.pdf
Hi Alex,
I don't like seeing a well researched question go un-answered, though I don't
have a very good answer for you. We don't have any documentation from any
previous work to say if there is an optimum chunk size for TCP sockets or unix
sockets.
Intuitively, if you're using a TCP socket, p
Thanks for the response, Micah. If the benefits are, indeed, unclear, then I
probably won't be futzing much with a perfectly functional implementation in
the near future--but if I do any experiments, I'll be sure to share the results.
- Alex
From: clamav-users o
Welcome to the ClamAV 0.101.0 beta!
Important notes about this release:
• Changes to the libclamav API:
• Those who build applications around our shared library will need to change
how they declare and pass scanning options to libclamav. Please take a look at
the change to our example
code
I use ClamAV for Win32 and am wondering if there is a way to tell
when an update contains a change to either of the .conf files so as
to know when it's ok to stay with the existing ones.
Thanks.
Brian Fluet
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-use
My suggestion would be to check out the release notes on GitHub for your
specific version:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-devel/commits/rel/0.100
Depends though on if you are running Talos, or ClamWin.
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
> -Original Message-
>
Hi all,
For some reason, clamdscan is returning a permissions error for files it
has read access to.
I've copied some output below to help show the situation...
==
root@arquivos0:/var/www# grep User /etc/clamav/clamd.conf
User clamav
root@arquivos0:/v
You'd want to:
ls -ld /
ls -ld /var
ls -ld /var/www
l s-ld /var/www/nc_data
and make sure user www-data has at least read and execute permissions to the
parent directories.
You probably have removed read and execute from other, so clamdscan can't go
down in the
directory hierarchy to get to /var/
Thanks for the url to the release notes.
I'm using the Win32 package from clamav.net in conjunction with
Mercury Mail Transport System which passes messages to clamd.
--
Brian Fluet
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http:/
Apparmor/SE Linux is another possibility.
Scott K
On October 30, 2018 9:29:28 PM UTC, SCOTT PACKARD
wrote:
>You'd want to:
>ls -ld /
>ls -ld /var
>ls -ld /var/www
>l s-ld /var/www/nc_data
>and make sure user www-data has at least read and execute permissions
>to the parent directories.
>You pro
>and make sure user www-data has at least read and execute permissions
If www-data didn't have r/w access to that directory, my site would be
broken!
>From the (redacted) comand output I copied above:
>> root@arquivos0:/var/www# sudo -u clamav ls nc_data/
>> [correct directory contents listed]
On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 07:01:40 PM Doug Ingham wrote:
> >and make sure user www-data has at least read and execute permissions
>
> If www-data didn't have r/w access to that directory, my site would be
> broken!
>
> From the (redacted) comand output I copied above:
> >> root@arquivos0:/var
Brian,
That would be Cisco direct, so the URL would be fine.
ClamWin has some modifications, though I don’t know how much they differ.
I’ve got an Exchange MTA running Jam software, and I think they use clamwin,
but I rely on them for updates which are usually several versions behind.
Sincerel
14 matches
Mail list logo