:)
We have some thoughts around 1.0. We want it to be a significant change, not
just an incremental improvement.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 3, 2018, at 23:48, Dennis Peterson
mailto:denni...@inetnw.com>> wrote:
On 10/3/18 10:37 AM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote:
https://blog.clamav.net/2018/10/cl
I hope it won't be in the style of Mozilla's "significant change" to
Firefox, which has just about destroyed it (IMHO, anyway).
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:00:00 +
"Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote:
> :)
>
> We have some thoughts around 1.0. We want it to be a significant
> change, not just an increme
Oh no. Not that kind of “significant change”. We have several ideas, but we
want 1.0 to be a shift in functionality and user experience, not just
incremental additions and functionality.
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 4, 2018, at 1:15 PM, Paul Kosinski wrote:
>
> I hope it won't be in the style
At Joel's suggestion, i have changed our sampling rate looking for ClamAV cvd
updates from 15 minutes down to 1 minute. This gives a more precise
measurement of how long it takes for the cvd file(s) to actually become
available from Cloudflare after its presence is "advertised" by the CNS TXT
@sanesecurity:
News: Sanesecurity.Rogue.0hr.20181004-1536 is causing FPs.
Fixed but reload signatures ASAP
Will investigate what went wrong.
Cheers,
Steve
Twitter: @sanesecurity
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the update.
I am interested to know how freshclam in ClamAV 0.100.2 performs for you. I
have made some tweaks to make it ignore mirrors for less time, but more
importantly I implemented a change to have it report "up to date" in the event
that the signature version provide
Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
> None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
>
> X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
> regardless of how the milter is configured
no
the whole purpose of this header is to signal if t
Am 27.09.18 um 01:53 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
>>> None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
>>>
>>> X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
>>>
Am 27.09.18 um 11:04 schrieb Arnaud Jacques:
>> I then restarted the milter. Unfortunately, the email is still marked as
>> Spam. I thought that clamav-milter would simply ignore the file.
>>
>> X-Virus-Status: Infected (SecuriteInfo.com.Spam-4701.UNOFFICIAL)
>
> You can whitelist the signature
