Re: [clamav-users] Keymarble Yara rule?

2018-08-14 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Sun 12/Aug/2018 14:04:06 +0200 Arnaud Jacques wrote: > > > Le 12/08/2018 à 13:59, Alessandro Vesely a écrit : >> On Sat 11/Aug/2018 19:43:34 +0200 G.w. Haywood wrote: >> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2018, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >>> >>> Re: Keymarble Yara rule?   4d 5a 7

Re: [clamav-users] Keymarble Yara rule?

2018-08-14 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Mon 13/Aug/2018 00:27:55 +0200 Al Varnell wrote: > I don't quite understand why you think it might not detect it.  > > Text strings are not required to have an even number of digits. The hex > equivalent to that string would be: {62 63 39 [...] 34 30}. As > long as the string appears in a file

Re: [clamav-users] Rogue definition Pdf.Exploit.CVE_2018_12798-6633682-0 causing a LOT of FP's

2018-08-14 Thread lukn
Same here. I agree this rule is causing too many FPs to remain active. Therefore I ended up whitelisting this rule. > I now only run in report mode and not delete mode I don't understand the whish to leave the decision of data destruction to a third party software. My system should follow my rul

Re: [clamav-users] Keymarble Yara rule?

2018-08-14 Thread Al Varnell
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant the malware sample, not your dummy. -Al- On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Mon 13/Aug/2018 00:27:55 +0200 Al Varnell wrote: > >> I don't quite understand why you think it might not detect it. >> >> Text strings are not required to ha