Hi,
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Alain Zidouemba
wrote:
> For "WannaCry", look for ClamAV signatures:
> Win.Ransomware.WannaCry-*
Are clamav users protected from this ransomware? Are there possible
variants not yet detected? Is there anything further we need to do to
protect ourselves, as it
To address WannaCry, look up signatures with the name:
Win.Ransomware.WannaCry-*
Re: email & WannaCry:
http://blog.talosintelligence.com/2017/05/wannacry.html?showComment=1494655249347#c771405865891887102
Re: anything further we need to do to protect ourselves:
"Organizations should ensure that
Hi there,
On Sun, 14 May 2017, Alex wrote:
Are clamav users protected from this ransomware?
To be clear about this, the current excitement is caused by a 'worm'.
That means if vulnerable, network-connected systems are not protected
from each other, for example by a firewall, the worm can prop
ClamAV isn't only used for mail. Clamwin and Immunet client will catch this.
--
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 14, 2017, at 12:42, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
>> On Sun, 14 May 2017, Alex wrote:
>>
>> Are clamav users protected from this ransomware?
>
> To be clear about this, the c
On 14/05/17 17:42, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>> Are clamav users protected from this ransomware?
Partially. Everyone agrees:
* Check MS17-010 is applied on every Windows device you can - before
tomorrow!
I don't have access to samples, but ClamAV seems to be picking up some
of Wcry/WanaCrypt0r/WannaC
