Hi,
We have reports of a domain being blacklisted and we don't think it should be:
LibClamAV debug: Phishcheck:Checking url
http://www.hospitalitytec.com->www.hospitalitytec.com
LibClamAV debug: Looking up hash
31E3DBF72F782E65722B2AE014524FF4F13F7022245ED9D4A7213D73F7B65A90 for
hospitalitytec.co
> Date: Thursday, October 06, 2016 08:40:39 -0400
> From: Alex
>
> Hi,
>
> We have reports of a domain being blacklisted and we don't think it
> should be:
>
> LibClamAV debug: Phishcheck:Checking url
> http://www.hospitalitytec.com->www.hospitalitytec.com
> LibClamAV debug: Looking up hash
> 3
On Thu, October 6, 2016 1:40 pm, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> We have reports of a domain being blacklisted and we don't think it
> should be:
>
> LibClamAV debug: Phishcheck:Checking url
> http://www.hospitalitytec.com->www.hospitalitytec.com
I think its better to keep the domain listed at the moment
On 04.10.16 22:19, crazy thinker wrote:
I am newbie to ClamAV. what is the exact difference between MaxQueue and
MaxConnectionQueueLength
the latter is afaik at TCP socket level, while the first at clamd level.
how many clamdscan instances can able to connect to clamd on local machine?
is the
Am 06.10.2016 um 16:08 schrieb Alex:
We have reports of a domain being blacklisted and we don't think it
should be:
LibClamAV debug: Phishcheck:Checking url
http://www.hospitalitytec.com->www.hospitalitytec.com
I think its better to keep the domain listed at the moment..
https://www.virusto
On Thu, October 6, 2016 3:21 pm, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> I have another that was just discovered. Is this a sanesecurity
>> pattern and could it be a FP? There's no reference to it on virustotal or
>> elsewhere:
>>
>>
>> # sigtool --find-sigs winnow.spam.ts.miscspam.1025807 | sigtool
>> --deco
>> We have reports of a domain being blacklisted and we don't think it
>> should be:
>>
>> LibClamAV debug: Phishcheck:Checking url
>> http://www.hospitalitytec.com->www.hospitalitytec.com
>
> I think its better to keep the domain listed at the moment..
>
> https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/291d973
@All
In MultiScan Mode,i would like to get each file staus call back from clamd
server but currently clamdscan gets callback from clamd when a file is
either infected or error one. clamdscan runs faster than clamscan..so i
would like to improve performance in full system scan
i am reading source