I sent this out last night, but it must have been rejected for length or
something, so I’ll remove the lengthy results of the third test and quotes to
see if that works.
-Al-
==
I ran some tests after my last posting to answer just this question, but
results were mixed so I was wait
Thanks for the responses. I am not a computer expert so I might not fully
understand
all that has been discussed but it sounds like ClamXav extracts(decompose?)
archive files like zip, RAR and then scan. But with .dmg
file it is uncertain that it does the same thing.
It sounds like ClamXav is
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 06:35 PM, Jinwon Lee wrote:
>
> Thanks for the responses. I am not a computer expert so I might not fully
> understand
> all that has been discussed but it sounds like ClamXav extracts(decompose?)
> archive files like zip, RAR and then scan. But with .dmg
> file it is u
On 3/28/15 6:48 PM, Al Varnell wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 06:35 PM, Jinwon Lee wrote:
Thanks for the responses. I am not a computer expert so I might not fully
understand
all that has been discussed but it sounds like ClamXav extracts(decompose?)
archive files like zip, RAR and then scan.
Thanks for that. I guess ‘Hash Value’ refers to the ClamAV identifying the
.dmg as a known file that contains virus/es.
Jinwon
> On 29/03/2015, at 2:48 pm, Al Varnell wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 06:35 PM, Jinwon Lee wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the responses. I am not a computer expert
On 3/28/15 10:43 PM, Jinwon Lee wrote:
Thanks for that. I guess ‘Hash Value’ refers to the ClamAV identifying the
.dmg as a known file that contains virus/es.
Jinwon
That was the case too for password protected zip files. If you can't burst the
contents you condemn the wrapper.
dp
___
Yes. It makes sense.
> On 29/03/2015, at 6:45 pm, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> On 3/28/15 10:43 PM, Jinwon Lee wrote:
>> Thanks for that. I guess ‘Hash Value’ refers to the ClamAV identifying the
>> .dmg as a known file that contains virus/es.
>>
>> Jinwon
>>
>>
> That was the case too for p
