Re: [clamav-users] Regarding Clamav 0.98.5 installation from source code

2014-12-23 Thread Matthias Egger
Hey Shawn Am 23.12.2014 um 07:59 schrieb naresh hcu: Since building 0.98.5 I am seeing ERROR: This tool requires libclamav with functionality level 79 or higher (current f-level: 77) when updating rules. I assume I have some mis-configuration but what? Give a look at this thread: http://lur

[clamav-users] https support for freshclam

2014-12-23 Thread Arnaud Jacques / SecuriteInfo.com
Hello, freshclam does not support https protocol. Example, in freshclam.conf : DatabaseCustomURL http://www.myserver.com/signatures.hdb works DatabaseCustomURL https://www.myserver.com/signatures.hdb doesn't ERROR: DatabaseCustomURL: Not supported protocol https is more and more used for web s

[clamav-users] Protection from cryptowall/cryptolocker

2014-12-23 Thread Alex Regan
Hi, I'm using the latest clamav on fedora20 with amavisd and postfix to protect a few hundred users and recently learned one of them were infected with cryptowall 2.0. I'm curious what the level of protection is for these viruses and what's being done to protect against them? I've done qui

Re: [clamav-users] Regarding Clamav 0.98.5 installation from source code

2014-12-23 Thread Dennis Peterson
What problem are you trying to solve with https? The data contain no secrets and are freely available to any who wish to have it, so the immediate effect of encryption is unneeded. Secondarily, https creates a greater server load to encrypt the data, trusted SSL certs are an added expense, and t

Re: [clamav-users] Regarding Clamav 0.98.5 installation from source code

2014-12-23 Thread Dennis Peterson
What a dummy - I responded to the wrong post :) On 12/23/14 10:41 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote: ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] https support for freshclam

2014-12-23 Thread Dennis Peterson
Second try: What problem are you trying to solve with https? The data contain no secrets and are freely available to any who wish to have it, so the immediate effect of encryption is unneeded. Secondarily, https creates a greater server load to encrypt the data, trusted SSL certs are an added

Re: [clamav-users] Protection from cryptowall/cryptolocker

2014-12-23 Thread Steve Basford
On Tue, December 23, 2014 6:35 pm, Alex Regan wrote: > I'd appreciate any further documents or other methods of protection that > people are using to block these? ClamAV and Sanesecurity signatures will help block malware which is emailed in, which can then download exploit packs, some of which