Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV®: The new ClamAV.net is here!

2014-09-04 Thread Joel Esler
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:53:30AM +0200, Andreas Schulze wrote: > Am 26.08.2014 20:56, schrieb Joel Esler (jesler): > > * Elimination of dead links and pages > > > I was told the old website contained the current patternversion > somewhere. That function is also gone away. > It's handy to p

[clamav-users] clamscan and PUA

2014-09-04 Thread Mark Price
In the past day we have had clamscan on several servers detect infected files due to: PUA.Windows.DoubleExtension-zippwd-3 I've read the clamscan manpage but have not had any luck with getting the "--detect-pua" option to work. Example: # clamscan --detect-pua=no ./sample-msg1.txt ./sample-msg1

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan and PUA

2014-09-04 Thread Douglas Goddard
That is a zip signature looking for double extension files. So, it is interesting that it is alerting on a .txt file, unless that is a zip file in disguise. You can whitelist the signature by adding a whitelist.ign file to your ClamAV database directory (for me, the path is: /usr/local/share/clama

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan and PUA

2014-09-04 Thread Douglas Goddard
I'm looking into the PUA issue and will follow up about that. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Douglas Goddard wrote: > That is a zip signature looking for double extension files. So, it is > interesting that it is alerting on a .txt file, unless that is a zip file > in disguise. > > You can wh

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan and PUA

2014-09-04 Thread Douglas Goddard
Thank you for catching that. PUA is not supported for this signature type, I will drop the signature and rename it to avoid the confusion of the incorrect PUA label. You'll need to whitelist the new name when that appears in a next day or so. Sorry for the inconvenience, Doug On Thu, Sep 4, 2014

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan and PUA

2014-09-04 Thread Mark Price
Hi Doug, On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Douglas Goddard wrote: > Thank you for catching that. PUA is not supported for this signature type, > I will drop the signature and rename it to avoid the confusion of the > incorrect PUA label. You'll need to whitelist the new name when that > appears i

[clamav-users] PUA.Misc.DoubleExtension-zippwd-4 false positive

2014-09-04 Thread Ted Gilchrist
I started receiving this virus warning, and I think it's a false alarm. I read that I could use clamscan --detect-pua=no to have clamscan ignore such PUA warnings, but that didn't work. How should I proceed? I notice that this virus definition just got added yesterday (http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV®: The new ClamAV.net is here!

2014-09-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 4. sep. 2014 07.54.34 Andreas Schulze wrote: It's handy to point a user to the official Website to proof that he's running outdated viresscanner. Freshclam gives a warning of outdates here just fine, does not need external tools to tell me that, are admins so dump todays ? __

Re: [clamav-users] PUA.Misc.DoubleExtension-zippwd-4 false positive

2014-09-04 Thread Douglas Goddard
This signature is in the process of being dropped. The signature is a ZMD and PUA is not supported for this type. Once it is dropped it will be re-published under a non PUA name. If you would still like to ignore these alerts you can add the new signatures' names to a whitelist.ign file in your Cl