Re: [clamav-users] OSX False Positives

2014-02-12 Thread Douglas Goddard
Thanks. These are all mine. I'll drop the FPs right away. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Al Varnell wrote: > I very much appreciate the obvious hard work from the signature team in > more than doubling the number of OSX signatures in the database today. > > Unfortunately it would appear that

Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging

2014-02-12 Thread Andrew Kelly
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:28 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: > On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: > > > So. > So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about > Debian support, right? You might have better luck here: Thanks for the guidance, Dennis, much app

Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging

2014-02-12 Thread Greg Folkert
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 15:29 +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:28 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: > > On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: > > > > > So. > > > So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about > > Debian support, right? You migh

Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging

2014-02-12 Thread Matthew Newton
Hi Andy, On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:29:28PM +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote: > At any rate, I'm running a farm of "stable" and "old-stable" > deployments, the dep nightmare of pulling something from testing > isn't really going to serve my customer base very well. And > the 20 minutes.. well, were it th

Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging

2014-02-12 Thread Simon Hobson
Greg Folkert wrote: > Debian Stable is that. If you must have 0.98.1, you should also be using > "backports"... at least I used to until I just used Sid for everything. > Backports help extend Stable's longevity and "freshness" a bit... but it > is no guarantee 0.98.1 will be there. Actually it

Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging

2014-02-12 Thread Dennis Peterson
On 2/12/14, 6:29 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:28 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: So. So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about Debian support, right? You might have better luck here: Thanks

Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging

2014-02-12 Thread Andrew Kelly
Tried to spare the list another thank you, but I wasn't able to mail you directly. Sorry list. Dennis, in light of the value you've explicitly placed upon your time, thank you once again for all the explanation and for your efforts. Very much appreciated. >> dp - Unix wonk since 1980 Nice

[clamav-users] LibhClamAV Warning

2014-02-12 Thread Anthony Magrone
How can I address the following warning? /etc/cron.daily/autoclam: LibClamAV Warning: SWF: Invalid tag length. LibClamAV info: scancws: Error decompressing SWF file Regards, Anthony Hamlin & Burton LIABILITY MANAGEMENT Anthony Magrone IT Administrator 321.972.0121 hamlinandburton.com

Re: [clamav-users] On access scan: OnAccessIncludePath not recursive?

2014-02-12 Thread Sandro Poppi
Steve, Thank you for your answer. One additional question: Are there any plans to add recursion for OnAccessIncludePath? Would be a great feature, especially when users add directories to their home dir. Regards, Sandro Am 11.02.2014 01:02, schrieb Steven Morgan: > Sandro, > > Yes, that is a re

Re: [clamav-users] LibhClamAV Warning

2014-02-12 Thread Shawn Webb
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Anthony Magrone < anthonymagr...@hamlinandburton.com> wrote: > How can I address the following warning? > > /etc/cron.daily/autoclam: > > LibClamAV Warning: SWF: Invalid tag length. > LibClamAV info: scancws: Error decompressing SWF file > > Regards, > Anthony > H

Re: [clamav-users] On access scan: OnAccessIncludePath not recursive?

2014-02-12 Thread Steven Morgan
Sandro, I have a fix for recursion. The problem is that OnAccessExcludePath still doesn't work. Here is a patch if you want to try it: diff --git a/clamd/fan.c b/clamd/fan.c index 70da61d..673f59c 100644 --- a/clamd/fan.c +++ b/clamd/fan.c @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ void *fan_th(void *arg) if((pt