Re: [clamav-users] request for feature

2014-02-04 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Kris Deugau wrote: My own favourite ClamAV integration glue, the MIMEDefang milter, does its own work to split off attachments and untangle "email" into "files" (more or less), and then points Clam at the whole set, on the not-unlikely chance Clam can't decode the

[clamav-users] HTML.CVE_2012_1526-3 necessary?

2014-02-04 Thread Andre Hübner
Hello, is a signatur like this HTML.CVE_2012_1526-3 really needed? HTML.CVE_2012_1526-3:3:*:7374796c653d{-256}6d617267696e3a{-20}2d(31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39)(30|31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39)(30|31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39)(30|31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39)656d This signature blocks html-pages with

Re: [clamav-users] HTML.CVE_2012_1526-3 necessary?

2014-02-04 Thread Dennis Peterson
On 2/4/14, 4:17 AM, Andre Hübner wrote: Hello, is a signatur like this HTML.CVE_2012_1526-3 really needed? HTML.CVE_2012_1526-3:3:*:7374796c653d{-256}6d617267696e3a{-20}2d(31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39)(30|31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39)(30|31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39)(30|31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39)656

Re: [clamav-users] HTML.CVE_2012_1526-3 necessary?

2014-02-04 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 09:01 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: > On 2/4/14, 4:17 AM, Andre Hübner wrote: > > Hello, > > > > is a signatur like this HTML.CVE_2012_1526-3 really needed? > > > > HTML.CVE_2012_1526-3:3:*:7374796c653d{-256}6d617267696e3a{-20}2d(31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39)(30|31|32|33|34|35|3