Hi,
Previously I was using a short list of signatures and startup time of 30
seconds
which was acceptable. Well it didn't get noticed much.
However recently I added a kitchen sink of extra databases like winnow etc.
Now startup time is 2.5 minutes, which becomes noticeable.
Any way to amelio
Sowhat qualifies as a kitchen sink-load?
Matt
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Vincent Fox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Previously I was using a short list of signatures and startup time of 30
> seconds
> which was acceptable. Well it didn't get noticed much.
>
> However recently I added a kitchen s
On 8/13/2013 8:49 PM, Matt Olney wrote:
Sowhat qualifies as a kitchen sink-load?
Most everything that SaneSecurity hosts that is low or medium risk:
ss_dbs="
blurl.ndb
bofhland_cracked_URL.ndb
bofhland_malware_URL.ndb
bofhland_phishing_URL.ndb
bofhland_malware_attach.hdb
OK...I'll do some testing tomorrow and see if we can't come up with some
information for you.
Matt
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Vincent Fox wrote:
> On 8/13/2013 8:49 PM, Matt Olney wrote:
>
>> Sowhat qualifies as a kitchen sink-load?
>>
>>
>> Most everything that SaneSecurity hosts
On 8/13/2013 9:46 PM, Matt Olney wrote:
OK...I'll do some testing tomorrow and see if we can't come up with some
information for you.
Mainly I want MX pool heavy on signatures. I tested shorter list on
SMTP pool:
ss_dbs="
blurl.ndb
bofhland_malware_URL.ndb
bofhland_phishing_URL.ndb
