Jerry, is this still an issue for you? Our systems team says there was an
issue with the box but that has been resolved.
Please let us know,
Matt
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Jerry wrote:
> Ever since I updated "clamav" the other day, the "freshclam.log" has
> been filling up with the fo
Not really sure what other people are thinking. ClamAV is built into
Sourcefire's advanced malware protection product (FireAMP). So we use it,
at least.
Matt
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Matt Olney skrev den 2013-03-22 18:49:
>
>
> Yep, we've heard that a couple
Benny,
I don't completely understand what you're saying. Do you have an issue and
you tried the fix? I'm not sure which URL you'r talking about that says
73, so I'm sort of at a loss as to how to help you.
Matt
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> daily.cvd is still her
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> daily.cvd is still here on 63 after doing this "fix"
>
> note that the url says 73, so is it fixed now ?
> __**_
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
> http:
Matt Olney skrev den 2013-03-26 15:52:
I don't completely understand what you're saying. Do you have an
issue and
you tried the fix? I'm not sure which URL you'r talking about that
says
73, so I'm sort of at a loss as to how to help you.
subject says f-level 73, but last with freshclam onl
David Raynor skrev den 2013-03-26 16:05:
Yes. If you ran sigtool to get the info from your daily.cvd file and
it
shows "Functionality level: 63", you don't have the problem. You
should
also be able to validate that your daily.cvd hashes do not match the
values
at the top of that page.
so it
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Matt Olney skrev den 2013-03-26 15:52:
>
>
> I don't completely understand what you're saying. Do you have an issue
>> and
>> you tried the fix? I'm not sure which URL you'r talking about that says
>> 73, so I'm sort of at a loss as to
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:59:19 -0400
Matt Olney articulated:
> Jerry, is this still an issue for you? Our systems team says there
> was an issue with the box but that has been resolved.
>
> Please let us know,
This is the output from roughly 1 hour ago:
Tue Mar 26 10:16:02 2013 -> Received signa
Matt Olney skrev den 2013-03-26 14:10:
Not really sure what other people are thinking. ClamAV is built into
Sourcefire's advanced malware protection product (FireAMP). So we
use it,
at least.
will it be opensource, with license key ?, well for now i happy with
clamav, its good to use for st
All of that is being looked at in the freshclam rewrite portion of the next
version of ClamAV.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Matt Olney skrev den 2013-03-26 14:10:
>
> Not really sure what other people are thinking. ClamAV is built into
>> Sourcefire's advanced malw
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:59:19 -0400
> Matt Olney articulated:
>
> > Jerry, is this still an issue for you? Our systems team says there
> > was an issue with the box but that has been resolved.
> >
> > Please let us know,
>
> This is the output from
The published TXT DNS record shows this from a few hours ago (retrieved
at 5:52AM GMT-4):
TXT from DNS: 0.97.7:54:16905:1364290140:1:63:40386:214
Clamav latest == 0.97.7
Main == 54
Daily == 16905
Timestamp == 1364290140 or Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:29:00 GMT
I don't recall == "1" (I don't remem
Ben,
I am looking into this issue. In the meantime, can you get any effect from
increasing the clamd.conf parameters ReadTimeout, CommandReadTimeout,
SendBufTimeout, and SelfCheck?
Steve
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Ben Stuyts wrote:
> Well, still no luck, same errors over the weekend. An
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 16:11 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> David Raynor skrev den 2013-03-26 16:05:
>
> > Yes. If you ran sigtool to get the info from your daily.cvd file and
> > it
> > shows "Functionality level: 63", you don't have the problem. You
> > should
> > also be able to validate that
Greg Folkert skrev den 2013-03-26 17:57:
I don't see what you are getting at, Benny.
then its solved :(
all i wanted was to clear if f-level 73 exists or not, in the subject
page it sayed f-level 73
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:14:52 -0400
Shawn Webb articulated:
> What version of ClamAV were you running before you updated and what
> version are you running now?
I am running FreeBSD-8.3 amd64. From the ports system, I am now using
"97.7". The version I updated from, (I think) was "97.3".
--
Jerr
Greg Folkert skrev den 2013-03-26 18:02:
damm smart people you dont own my domain and sayin i cant it
missunderstanding from your own point
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
OK Benny Pedersen , Benny Pedersen , Benny
Pedersen , Benny Pedersen , Benny Pedersen
, Benny Pedersen , Benny Pedersen ,
Benny Pedersen , Benny Pedersen , Benny Pedersen
, Benny Pedersen , Benny Pedersen ,
Explain to me *HOW* you can stop me from doing that?
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 18:12 +0100,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benny, Greg,
Please take this conversation off list, this list is not an
appropriate place for this discussion.
Thanks
Tom
- --
Senior Research Engineer
Sourcefire Vulnerability Research Team
On 3/26/13 1:22 PM, Greg Folkert wrote:
> OK Benny Pede
Tom Judge skrev den 2013-03-26 18:25:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benny, Greg,
Please take this conversation off list, this list is not an
appropriate place for this discussion.
privacy is gold, sad to see so many does not care :(
20 matches
Mail list logo
