Am 13.09.2011 20:49, schrieb Bowie Bailey:
> On 9/13/2011 1:18 PM, sys...@ra-schaal.de wrote:
>> Am 13.09.2011 18:01, schrieb Al Varnell:
>>> On Sep 13, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Dan wrote:
>>>
Yet more failure on 88.198.67.125, this morning. This one is a double.
>>> I was going to wait a few more
On 9/14/11 12:29 AM, "sys...@ra-schaal.de" wrote:
> i made some changes to the firewall. if it works be now, please mail me
> as soon as possible.
>
I was able to connect via my browser. I forced an update by pulling out my
bytecode.cld and it successfully downloaded it from your mirror. So
wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/14/2011 2:29 AM, sys...@ra-schaal.de wrote:
> i made some changes to the firewall. if it works be now, please
> mail me as soon as possible.
I started getting successful updates from 88.198.67.125 a couple
hours after you posted this, and port 8
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Dan wrote:
> At 7:44 AM -0500 9/14/2011, Noel Jones wrote:
> > On 9/14/2011 2:29 AM, sys...@ra-schaal.de wrote:
> > > i made some changes to the firewall. if it works be now, please
> > > mail me as soon as possible.
> >
> > I started getting successful updates from 88.198.
> Does your dig use the host table? Mine does not. Same with nslookup.
> I can't imagine why they would, in fact.
Yea, I had to use "getent hosts db.us.clamav.net" to make sure the /etc/hosts
entry was
working.
--
Bryan Burke
IT Administrator
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sc
At 7:44 AM -0500 9/14/2011, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/14/2011 2:29 AM, sys...@ra-schaal.de wrote:
i made some changes to the firewall. if it works be now, please
> mail me as soon as possible.
I started getting successful updates from 88.198.67.125 a couple
hours after you posted this, and port
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Dan wrote:
> http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/88.198.67.125
>
> Says it's up.
Received responses: 53 Ok 5 Fail
http://host-tracker.com/check_res_ajx/8730391-0/
Cheers,
Steve
Sanesecurity
___
Help us build a comprehensive
On 9/13/2011 10:29 PM, Al Varnell wrote:
> I was trying to say that using this command:
>
> freshclam --stdout --quiet --no-warnings
> --log=/usr/local/clamXav/share/clamav/freshclam.log
>
> I can determine the IP address of a successful update in the last line, e.g.
>
> Database updated (10388
Clamav Common Execution Environment patch set.
CCEE is a patch set to the ClamAV source that does the following:
1. Implements fixes for bugs 1754 and 2727.
2. Adds additional functionality to the software.
CCEE 0.97.2 Features.
Code Cleanup.
Derived from the ClamAV 0.97.2 Codebase
At 12:36 PM -0400 9/13/2011, Bryan Burke wrote:
> Noone has suggested "maximum". The issue is that the mirrors are so
overloaded that it's often taking freshclam an excessive amount of
time to do its thing, because of the time-outs / connection
failures. No big deal if it's the update run i
On 9/14/11 12:29 AM, sys...@ra-schaal.de wrote:
if you can´t connect to 88.198.67.125, you should fall back to
46.4.61.241. it seems, that freshclam won´t use the second ip.
nslookup clamav.akxnet.de
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53
Name: clamav.akxnet.de
Address: 88.19
At 12:36 PM -0400 9/13/2011, Bryan Burke wrote:
> Noone has suggested "maximum". The issue is that the mirrors are so
overloaded that it's often taking freshclam an excessive amount of
time to do its thing, because of the time-outs / connection
failures. No big deal if it's the update run i
Hi,
I encountered an issue where ClamAV doesn't detect malicious payload in PDFs
stored in a Launch Action. (PDF File Format Section 8.5.3 Action Types see
"Launch Actions")
Here's an example:
8 0 obj
<<
/Type /Action
/S /Launch
/Win
<<
/F (cmd.exe)
/P ( BLAH.. you get the point ...)
Am 14.09.2011 18:15, schrieb Dennis Peterson:
> expectation is that a reliable service is running only at the IP in the
> authorative DNS server at clamav.net and that IP is 88.198.67.125. Your
> depending on 46.4.61.241 as a fallback server is bad architecture.
I told them a few months ago, and
It's been almost twenty-four hours since the Firewall was fixed, so I
thought I'd take this opportunity to thank everybody involved, both for
backing me up when there was much doubt and for offering useful suggestions
and obviously to Florian for solving at his part of the issue. Hopefully US
user
On 09/14/2011 09:20 AM, Dan wrote:
At 12:36 PM -0400 9/13/2011, Bryan Burke wrote:
> Noone has suggested "maximum". The issue is that the mirrors are so
overloaded that it's often taking freshclam an excessive amount of
time to do its thing, because of the time-outs / connection
failures. N
16 matches
Mail list logo
