Hello.
Whether to place the virus database in tarball ? It become obsolete
very quickly and take up space. Update is required after installation
in any case.
--
Regards,
Sergey
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.ne
On 6/24/11 2:09 AM, "Sergey" wrote:
> Whether to place the virus database in tarball ? It become obsolete
> very quickly and take up space. Update is required after installation
> in any case.
>
Yes, but it doesn't take as long or as much bandwidth to incrementally
update it as it does to downloa
On Friday, June 24, 2011, Al Varnell wrote:
> Yes, but it doesn't take as long or as much bandwidth to incrementally
> update it as it does to download the entire database every time there
> is an update.
Why? Old base may remain after update. User can do it.
--
Regards,
Sergey
On 06/24/11 11:09, Sergey wrote:
> Whether to place the virus database in tarball ? It become obsolete
> very quickly and take up space. Update is required after installation
> in any case.
Hi Sergey,
this has been discussed many times already.
Rationale is: shipping the db in the tarball helps
On Friday, June 24, 2011, aCaB wrote:
> Rationale is: shipping the db in the tarball helps a lot in reducing
> load and bw usage on our mirrors (which are provided for free to all
> our userbase) and still allows for quick incremental updates.
Is it statisc or opinion ?
I thought about it. Use