2011/3/13 :
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:13:42 +0800
> From: Michael Wu
> Subject: [clamav-users] Problem while combining clamav-milter 0.97 and
> sendmail
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm r
Em 14-03-2011 16:14, Brian Morrison escreveu:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:15:09 -0300
Clovis Tristao wrote:
How do I upgrade ClamAV version 0.95.3 package for Fedora 12 in
ClamAV 0.97 tar.gz? There is a version 0.97 in yum package for this
version of Fedora?
It's fairly simple to do, you need to i
* Michael Wu wrote:
> Thanks Richard ( lists-clamav ) to give me some hints that I can clean
> the quarantined mails with the command "qtool.pl -d -Q
> /var/spool/mqueue". On Fedora 13, the sendmail-doc rpm must be
> installed to get "qtool.pl". Because I am not an expert in coding,
> where can I g
Hello,
I'm running clamav 0.965 on a G5 (1 processor) with OS X Server 10.4.11. Clamav
runs as root. This machine is primarily used as a file server, with a mixture
of OS X and Windows clients.
A launchdaemon automatically kicks off an overnight scan by sending a command
to clamdscan. Only di
Add RAM if you haven't maxed it out yet.
Purchase a faster, Intel Mac. Apple has not supported your OS since 2009
and seems to have removed support for PPC Macs from a software development
standpoint.
-Al-
--
Al Varnell
Mountain View, CA
On 3/15/11 12:21 PM, "Russ Tyndall" wrote:
> I'm ru
Russ,
Look at your config file. You don't need to scan all more than probably 200KB
of a file. If you're using google; don't. It will help for email but probably
will not help finding badness on a file server. Likewise with unofficials. Not
all unofficials are appropriate for your application.
On Mar 15, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Russ Tyndall wrote:
> Because of the huge volume of data being scanned (70 Gb), the scan takes
> about 6 hours to complete.
>
> Is there a practical way to reduce the scan time?
As Al noted, 10.4 is about six years old-- released April 2005, last patch was
10.4.11
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 13:51 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Russ Tyndall wrote:
> > Because of the huge volume of data being scanned (70 Gb), the scan takes
> > about 6 hours to complete.
> >
> > Is there a practical way to reduce the scan time?
>
> As Al noted, 10.4 i
On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Al Varnell wrote:
> Add RAM if you haven't maxed it out yet.
>
> Purchase a faster, Intel Mac. Apple has not supported your OS since 2009
> and seems to have removed support for PPC Macs from a software development
> standpoint.
Shucks, I would be thrilled with an
On Mar 15, 2011, at 4:48 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
> Look at your config file. You don't need to scan all more than probably 200KB
> of a file.
So you are suggesting I use the MaxScanSize directive to limit scans to the
first 200KB of each file? (i.e., add a line to clamd.conf: MaxScanSize 200KB).
On Mar 15, 2011, at 6:56 PM, Russ Tyndall wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 4:48 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
>
>> Look at your config file. You don't need to scan all more than probably
>> 200KB of a file.
>
> So you are suggesting I use the MaxScanSize directive to limit scans to the
> first 200KB of e
Several users complained after initial installation of ClamXav that they
were getting the following results:
> main.cld is up to date (version: 53, sigs: 846214, f-level: 53, builder: sven)
> Downloading daily.cvd [100%]
> ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity
> Giving up on databas
Hi folks,
The daily.cvd file appears to be corrupt. The diff files are ok, so scripted
updates still work fine, but for people who have scripted updates turned off
(or have no defs to begin with) running freshclam fails.
Mark
[colossus] mark% freshclam -v
Current working dir is /usr/local/sha
...and of course, it's working again now - before my message even hits the
mailing list.
Sorry!
Mark
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On 3/15/11 1:51 PM, "Chuck Swiger" wrote:
> As Al noted, 10.4 is about six years old-- released April 2005, last patch was
> 10.4.11 in Nov 2007.
>
True enough. Apple's rule of thumb is that they only support the current
and one previous release which would have made 10.4 unsupported when 10.6
w
15 matches
Mail list logo
