Re: [clamav-users] daily database broken again

2011-03-05 Thread Jim Preston
On 03/04/2011 04:31 PM, Jerry wrote: On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:05:57 -0700 Jim Preston articulated: A system should serve your needs, not its. It sounds to me like you have become a slave to yours. Any properly maintained system needs some degree of personalizing; ie, configuration. However, if yo

Re: [clamav-users] daily database broken again

2011-03-05 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 09:36 -0700, Jim Preston wrote: > On 03/04/2011 04:31 PM, Jerry wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:05:57 -0700 > > Jim Preston articulated: > > > > A system should serve your needs, not its. It sounds to me like you > > have become a slave to yours. Any properly maintained sys

Re: [clamav-users] daily database broken again

2011-03-05 Thread Dennis Peterson
On 3/5/11 8:36 AM, Jim Preston wrote: You have missed the point, my system does serve my needs to the extent that upgrading the OS is not worth the benefit till now. A major cause is the lack of a clean upgrade path from the early FC versions. The recommended method was a clean install. Since v

Re: [clamav-users] daily database broken again

2011-03-05 Thread Peter Bonivart
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Though there is no free VM tool for Mac - Fusion is dirt cheap. VirtualBox is free and runs on Mac, it can even host Mac vm's. /peter ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http:/

[clamav-users] ClamAV 0.97 - configure wants zlib/zlib-devel packages, not in repository

2011-03-05 Thread ANDY
DELL LATITUDE D600 UBUNTU 9.10 +proposed ClamAV 0.95.3 ClamTK 4.31 clamav-0.97.tar.gz zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-13ubuntu3 When I check the Ubuntu Synaptic repository, I do not find zlib/zlib-devel packages - but do find zlib1g/zlib1g-dev packages. How should I proceed? [I didn't find my clue in the

Re: [clamav-users] daily database broken again

2011-03-05 Thread Jim Preston
On 03/05/2011 02:51 PM, Steve Holdoway wrote: I think that you're so outside anything that could remotely be called Fedora to become irrelevant. FC7 is way out of support, and all Fedoras are only designed to be short term desktop os's anyway. So all of your support is manual, and you've lost

Re: [clamav-users] daily database broken again

2011-03-05 Thread Jim Preston
On 03/05/2011 03:11 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: On 3/5/11 8:36 AM, Jim Preston wrote: You have missed the point, my system does serve my needs to the extent that upgrading the OS is not worth the benefit till now. A major cause is the lack of a clean upgrade path from the early FC versions.