[clamav-users] Possible problem with older versions of ClamAV (0.96-0.96.3)

Dear users, ClamAV versions older than 0.96.4 are affected by a bug in the logical signature parser, which can make them load and mishandle signatures designed for newer engines. As a result, these versions may generate incorrect detections, leading to false positive alerts. If you're running one

Re: [clamav-users] Possible problem with older versions of ClamAV (0.96-0.96.3)

On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:46:34 +0100 Tomasz Kojm wrote: > Dear users, > > ClamAV versions older than 0.96.4 are affected by a bug in the logical > signature parser, which can make them load and mishandle signatures > designed for newer engines. As a result, these versions may generate > incorrect

Re: [clamav-users] daily database screwed up?

> On 2/10/2011 4:29 PM, Kelsey Cummings wrote: >> So very not cool! On 10.02.11 17:21, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: > Yikes. Nothing like an unplanned and untested upgrade. At least I am now > running the latest! I had about 900 emails queued up since clamd failed. > All looks good n

Re: [clamav-users] Possible problem with older versions of ClamAV (0.96-0.96.3)

On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:53:02 +0100 Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:46:34 +0100 > Tomasz Kojm wrote: > >> Dear users, >> >> ClamAV versions older than 0.96.4 are affected by a bug in the logical >> signature parser, which can make them load and mishandle signatures >> desi