Hello list,
Excuse the beginner question please.
Clamav is correctly built (without --enable-milter) and running. It
doesn't listen on any TCP port but does open a unix socket here:
$ ls /pfx/var/clamav/clamd.sock
1 pfixuser pfixuser0 2009-11-01 16:00 /pfx/var/clamav/clamd.sock
I've te
clamavl...@encambio.com wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Excuse the beginner question please.
Hi Brian,
To answer your final question: yes, it is possible. Yes you don't need
amavis.
However you seem a bit confused about postix interfaces.
In particular the content_filter interface is not the same as t
Hello acab,
On mon., Nov 02, 2009, aCaB wrote:
>On mon., Nov 02, 2009, clamavl...@encambio.com wrote:
>> Questions
>> -
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I'd rather not start with Amavis, Amavisd, Amavis(new), or any
>> other software if it's possible to use Clamav directly with my
>> MTA+Spamassasin.
>>
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 aCaB wrote:
> On our side we do a lot of QA
> ...
> I really believe something needs to happen here so that these type of
> bugs can be caught quickly before they affect a number of users.
>
> Thoughts?
I suspect that rather than QA, what you do is just a lot of hap
Hi everyone,
We are using Sanesecurity signatures in clamd for scanning mails. Recently
we are seeing some load issues on clamd server due to sanesecurity
signatures (load is automatically decreasing when the sanesecurity sigs are
removed)
Does anyone face this issue before? Sanesecurity sigs are
On 11/2/2009 1:42 PM, Avinash wrote:
Hi everyone,
We are using Sanesecurity signatures in clamd for scanning mails. Recently
we are seeing some load issues on clamd server due to sanesecurity
signatures (load is automatically decreasing when the sanesecurity sigs are
removed)
Does anyone face t
At 4:10 PM -0600 11/2/09, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/2/2009 1:42 PM, Avinash wrote:
Hi everyone,
We are using Sanesecurity signatures in clamd for scanning mails. Recently
we are seeing some load issues on clamd server due to sanesecurity
signatures (load is automatically decreasing when the sanes
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Tom Shaw wrote:
> At 4:10 PM -0600 11/2/09, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> On 11/2/2009 1:42 PM, Avinash wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> We are using Sanesecurity signatures in clamd for scanning mails.
>>> Recently
>>> we are seeing some load issues on clamd server due
On 11/03/2009 12:21 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
> On a whim, I renamed the clamav database directory, ran freshclam to get
> just the basic signatures, and restarted clamd. Number of signatures went
> from 925,000+ to under 600,000, and CPU usage dropped to below 20%. Cleared
> out 1200 messages fr
