Hello,
I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and clamav-0.95.2 package.
When I set "ClamukoScanOnAccess yes" and "ClamukoScanOnOpen yes" in
clamd.conf, the daemon logs that message: Clamuko is not available.
Is there any another package to install ?
regards,
Fred
On 2009-09-24 01:02, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> I am a tad confused about your reporting comment as the
>> clamav web reporting mechanism works fine at least for me
>> and you can also
>> report via virustotal as well.
>>
>> Anyway glad your happy with your config.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> btw its winnow a
>> Seems to work. I just got this:
>>
>> --
>> A virus was found: W32/Downldr3.GW
>>
>> Banned name: .exe,.exe-ms,open.exe
>> Scanners detecting a virus: F-PROT Antivirus for UNIX,
>> BitDefender
>>
>> Content type: Virus
>> Internal reference
Hello Jari,
> clamav NOW detects that even without pua, things updated.
> But the older DHL-incoices. No. Not even with detect-pua=yes.
what does the form answer you when you try to submit it? It should
reject it with a message.
That message can help us to track down the issue.
Best regards
-
> Hello Jari,
>
>> clamav NOW detects that even without pua, things updated.
>> But the older DHL-incoices. No. Not even with
>> detect-pua=yes.
>
> what does the form answer you when you try to submit it?
> It should reject it with a message.
>
> That message can help us to track down the issu
On 2009-09-24 16:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> Hello Jari,
>>
>>
>>> clamav NOW detects that even without pua, things updated.
>>> But the older DHL-incoices. No. Not even with
>>> detect-pua=yes.
>>>
>> what does the form answer you when you try to submit it?
>> It should reject it w
Hello Jari,
> >> clamav NOW detects that even without pua, things updated.
> >> But the older DHL-incoices. No. Not even with
> >> detect-pua=yes.
> > what does the form answer you when you try to submit it?
> > It should reject it with a message.
> > That message can help us to track down the i
> Yeah, we already know that. Can you please cut&paste the full message
> returned by the form? Thanks,
Hi Luca,
I've *just* uploaded 4 copies of the dhl invoice malware that have been
missed by up-to-date official sigs.
These were blocked using Sanesecurity.Malware.12505.UNOFFICIAL.
Hope it h
At 2:19 PM +0100 9/24/09, Steve Basford wrote:
> Yeah, we already know that. Can you please cut&paste the full message
returned by the form? Thanks,
Hi Luca,
I've *just* uploaded 4 copies of the dhl invoice malware that have been
missed by up-to-date official sigs.
These were blocked using
At 9:53 AM -0400 9/24/09, Tom Shaw wrote:
At 2:19 PM +0100 9/24/09, Steve Basford wrote:
> Yeah, we already know that. Can you please cut&paste the full message
returned by the form? Thanks,
Hi Luca,
I've *just* uploaded 4 copies of the dhl invoice malware that have been
missed by up-to-da
> On 2009-09-24 16:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>> Hello Jari,
>>>
>>>
clamav NOW detects that even without pua, things
updated. But the older DHL-incoices. No. Not even with
detect-pua=yes.
>>> what does the form answer you when you try to submit it?
>>> It should reject it
ClamAV does not pick up the GTUBE test pattern.
GTUBE - the Generic Test for Unsolicited Bulk Email.
This is one of the tests that nospamtoday uses. See:
http://www.nospamtoday.com/emailsecurity/
Is this because it is redundant because of the Eicar test signature?
James.
_
12 matches
Mail list logo