Re: [Clamav-users] clamd 0.95.2 memory

2009-07-08 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-07-08 08:49, Alex Gavriloff wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:10:52 +0300 > Török Edwin wrote: > > >> No, using 589M memory for the DB is not OK. >> >> Are you using only the official DBs, or are you also using 3rdparty DBs? >> >> > I didnt even know is 3dparty DBs exists. > > here i

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd 0.95.2 memory

2009-07-08 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 08:49:34 +0300 Alex Gavriloff wrote: > Config file: freshclam.conf > --- [...] > UpdateLogFile = "/var/log/clam-update.log" > DatabaseMirror = "database.clamav.net", "db.ua.clamav.net", > "database.clamav.net" BTW, please remove the first DatabaseMirror

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd 0.95.2 memory

2009-07-08 Thread Alex Gavriloff
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:36:19 +0200 Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > Config file: freshclam.conf > > --- > [...] > > UpdateLogFile = "/var/log/clam-update.log" > > DatabaseMirror = "database.clamav.net", "db.ua.clamav.net", > > "database.clamav.net" > > BTW, please remove the first D

[Clamav-users] MS 972890

2009-07-08 Thread Sven Wurth
clamav-users, were can I get information if clamav has patterns against the new ActiveX MS 972890? Thanks Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd 0.95.2 memory

2009-07-08 Thread Alex Gavriloff
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:26:04 +0300 Török Edwin wrote: > How much memory does clamd use on startup? > After how much time does memory usage increase to 589M? it use 600 M on startup. then it increases it every day but calmdtop shows always 589M. right now it got PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE

Re: [Clamav-users] MS 972890

2009-07-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
Sven Wurth wrote: clamav-users, were can I get information if clamav has patterns against the new ActiveX MS 972890? ClamAV scans for infections (viruses, malware, etc.), not vulnerabilities. From what I understand, if you use the ActiveX video control (pre-Vista/2008), then you are vulnerab