Hello,
after uninstalling the old version 0.94.2 and compiling/installing the
new 0.95 I figured out some problems on my Debian Lenny system.
It seems that "make install" does not proper install the
"libclamav.so.6", so starting clamd was not possible. There was an error:
"clamd: error while l
On 2009-03-24 11:37, Robert Klikics wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after uninstalling the old version 0.94.2 and compiling/installing the
> new 0.95 I figured out some problems on my Debian Lenny system.
>
> It seems that "make install" does not proper install the
> "libclamav.so.6", so starting clamd was n
Hi,
thank you - ldconfig fixed the issue's, therefore I've deleted the lib
from /lib!
Regards,
Robert
Török Edwin schrieb:
> On 2009-03-24 11:37, Robert Klikics wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> after uninstalling the old version 0.94.2 and compiling/installing the
>> new 0.95 I figured out some proble
On 2009-03-23 23:27, Bill Landry wrote:
> Török Edwin wrote:
>
>
>> They can be whitelisted by using .wdb entries [1], which allows you to
>> use a POSIX regular expressions to whitelist any URL.
>> (the original URL, not the hash).
>>
>> Since the entries in safebrowsing.cld change often whitel
On 2009-03-24 12:13, Robert Klikics wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thank you - ldconfig fixed the issue's, therefore I've deleted the lib
> from /lib!
>
I've added this to the 0.95 upgrade notes [1]
https://wiki.clamav.net/Main/InstallFromSource
https://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes095#Caveats
[1]
Alth
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 +
> Ian Eiloart wrote:
> > That sounds good. What does it do, though?
> > My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files
> > containing URLs that Google considers "unsafe", and then clamd will
> > block emails that contain those URLs. Is that
On 2009-03-24 13:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 +
>> Ian Eiloart wrote:
>>
>>> That sounds good. What does it do, though?
>>> My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files
>>> containing URLs that Google considers "unsafe", and then
aCaB wrote:
> Turn off LogClean in clamd.conf.
While I could do that, I would prefer the feature to work correctly. Is
anyone else having this issue with 0.95? Is this a known bug that will
be fixed in a future version?
Thanks.
--Vincent
Disclaimer: Any references to Pipeline performance co
oh well.
immediately after the announcement, freshclam is spewing warnings,
although most mirrors are not able to deliver yet.
the 'make check', successful with rc1 and rc2, fails:
'FAIL: check_clamd.sh'.
the clamav-milter ('standalone') thingy i am using for years now has totally
changed.
eg
On 2009-03-24 15:22, Vincent Aniello wrote:
> aCaB wrote:
>
>> Turn off LogClean in clamd.conf.
>>
>
> While I could do that, I would prefer the feature to work correctly. Is
> anyone else having this issue with 0.95? Is this a known bug that will
> be fixed in a future version?
>
Wha
> >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 +
> >> Ian Eiloart wrote:
> >>> That sounds good. What does it do, though?
> >>> My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files
> >>> containing URLs that Google considers "unsafe", and then clamd will
> >>> block emails that contain those
> Török Edwin wrote:
> What is the bug here? That the filename scanned is not logged?
I think so. When LogClean = yes I get a lot of this in my log file:
Mar 24 09:26:28 emailfw3 clamd[23436]: fd[10]: OK
Mar 24 09:27:13 emailfw3 last message repeated 4 times
Mar 24 09:28:21 emailfw3 last message
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> You can then filter based on the virusname, if you want to treat
>> phishing/safebrowsing-blacklisted entries as spam.
>
> Yes, that wil be important. Does clamav-milter support this for now?
Hi,
clamav-milter has been nerfed and it now relies on clamd.
All you h
christian wrote:
> but: how?
The easier option is probably to build clamav-milter from 0.94.2 and use
it together with clamd from 0.95.
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/clamav/clamav-0.94.2.tar.gz
--aCaB
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
Török Edwin wrote:
> For whitelisting lada.cc you can use either:
> X:(.+\.)?lada.cc([/?].*)?:(.+\.)?lada.cc([/?].*)?
>
> Or this one (but it will also whitelist URL mismatches from lada.cc to
> anything, not recommended):
> X:(.+\.)?lada.cc([/?].*)?:.+
>
> Or any other regular expression that w
On 2009-03-24 17:04, Bill Landry wrote:
> Török Edwin wrote:
>
>
>> For whitelisting lada.cc you can use either:
>> X:(.+\.)?lada.cc([/?].*)?:(.+\.)?lada.cc([/?].*)?
>>
>> Or this one (but it will also whitelist URL mismatches from lada.cc to
>> anything, not recommended):
>> X:(.+\.)?lada.cc([/
Török Edwin wrote:
>> Ok, I've reviewed the phishsigs_howto.pdf, but have failed in my efforts
>> to create a whitelist entry based on the hash
>
> "whitelist entry based on hash = per-entry whitelisting" I was referring
> to below, that will be in 0.95.1
>
>> (rather than using a
>> regular ex
I got this message after updating from 0.94.2 to 0.95.
[fc...@s3 fchan]# freshclam -v
Current working dir is /var/lib/clamav
Max retries == 5
ClamAV update process started at Tue Mar 24 11:37:35 2009
Using IPv6 aware code
Querying current.cvd.clamav.net
TTL: 884
Software version from DNS: 0.95
mai
On 2009-03-24 20:55, fchan wrote:
> I got this message after updating from 0.94.2 to 0.95.
>
> [fc...@s3 fchan]# freshclam -v
> Current working dir is /var/lib/clamav
> Max retries == 5
> ClamAV update process started at Tue Mar 24 11:37:35 2009
> Using IPv6 aware code
> Querying current.cvd.clamav
This is what I get for command line date +%s:
[fc...@s3 fchan]# date +%s
1237925239
Thank you,
Frank
>On 2009-03-24 20:55, fchan wrote:
>> I got this message after updating from 0.94.2 to 0.95.
>>
>> [fc...@s3 fchan]# freshclam -v
>> Current working dir is /var/lib/clamav
>> Max retries == 5
On 2009-03-24 22:09, fchan wrote:
> This is what I get for command line date +%s:
>
> [fc...@s3 fchan]# date +%s
> 1237925239
>
> Thank you,
> Frank
>
That is correct, please open a bugreport.
--Edwin
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: v
Thank you Edwin for helping with this. I opened Bug 1498.
Frank
On 2009-03-24 22:09, fchan wrote:
This is what I get for command line date +%s:
[fc...@s3 fchan]# date +%s
1237925239
Thank you,
Frank
ÊÊ
That is correct, please open a bugreport.
--Edwin
Hi,
I just upgraded to ClamAV 0.95. I am trying SafeBrowsing.
Please, I would like to know why it is mandatory to run freshclam
every 30 minutes when using that feature (safebrowsing).
Thank you for your attention and for the great ClamAV.
Best regards,
Cássio
__
cas...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded to ClamAV 0.95. I am trying SafeBrowsing.
>
> Please, I would like to know why it is mandatory to run freshclam
> every 30 minutes when using that feature (safebrowsing).
>
> Thank you for your attention and for the great ClamAV.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:30 PM, aCaB wrote:
> cas...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Please, I would like to know why it is mandatory to run freshclam
>> every 30 minutes when using that feature (safebrowsing).
>>
>> Thank you for your attention and for the great ClamAV.
>
> This is mandated by the
25 matches
Mail list logo
