Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

2009-03-18 Thread Moray Henderson (ICT)
>From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] >>> Try using for the URL. >>> >> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because >some of >> them may not know this :). > >No, there are more places from where URLs can be extracted, but "href" is one that must work. With

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

2009-03-18 Thread Dennis Peterson
Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: >> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] Try using for the URL. >>> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because >> some of >>> them may not know this :). >> No, there are more places from where URLs can be extracted, but

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems builing in solaris related to unrar libraries

2009-03-18 Thread Steve Ladewig
Dennis Peterson said the following, On 03/17/2009 03:29 PM: > George R. Kasica wrote: > If you run the crle command with no options it will report the current global > library search path. It will also present a command line example of how to > recreate this path. Use can use that example and add

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

2009-03-18 Thread Erwan David
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis Peterson said: > Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: > >> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] > Try using for the URL. > > >>> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because > >> some of > >>> them may not kn

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

2009-03-18 Thread John Rudd
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:55, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: >>> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] > Try using for the URL. > Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because >>> some of them may not know this :). >>>

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

2009-03-18 Thread Dennis Peterson
Erwan David wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis Peterson > said: >> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] >> Try using for the URL. >> > Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because some

[Clamav-users] Extracting information from the new clamav-milter

2009-03-18 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
I have started testing the new clamav-milter. We had been doing some specialized procvessing with the old one, and I am trying to see if we can do this with the new one. We reject (5xx) viruses in the initial connection. We use the postmaster notify feature, and feed those message to a script

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

2009-03-18 Thread Tom Shaw
At 7:20 AM -0700 3/18/09, Dennis Peterson wrote: >Erwan David wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis >>Peterson said: >>> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: > From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] >>> Try using for the URL. >>> >> Is that a requirement?

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV and VirusTotal

2009-03-18 Thread Paul Whelan
On 17 Mar 2009 at 21:22, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > out of the box windows support is planned for ClamAV 0.96; in general > we don't distribute any binaries but we may consider doing this for > windows when the support is mature enough Thanks for the update. paul

Re: [Clamav-users] Failed milter upgrade to .95rc2

2009-03-18 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:50:20 -0700 Ed Kasky wrote: > Does the required entry in sendmail.mc change at all? > > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', > `S=local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl > define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', `spf-milter,clamav')dnl > > Ed I'm running with a couple

Re: [Clamav-users] Failed milter upgrade to .95rc2

2009-03-18 Thread Ed Kasky
At 09:00 PM Wednesday, 3/18/2009, Steve Holdoway wrote -=> >On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:50:20 -0700 >Ed Kasky wrote: > > > Does the required entry in sendmail.mc change at all? > > > > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', > > `S=local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl > > define(`confINPUT_MAI